Comments by "R" (@rdrrr) on "JRE Clips" channel.

@JoeyLutes No. The Beatles got caught up in a brawl outside a nightclub in Liverpool in late '61. Stu got socked in the head. John jumped in and dragged him to safety. After it was all over the others tried to get Stu to go to hospital but he said he felt fine. Months later, when the Beatles were back in Hamburg, Stu started having headaches. He went to see a couple of doctors but neither could find anything wrong with him. Not long after that he suffered a hemorrhage and died. Only one person claimed John was responsible for Stu's death and she cannot be trusted (she was probably trying to stir controversy to drum up sales of her memoirs - she couldn't possibly have known what happened, and I don't think Stu would've stayed with the band if John had kicked his head in!)
2
@xWingzTV Well ain't you just a laugh riot, pal
1
George really grew into his looks, he was a little gangly and awkward as a teenager but became a handsome man
1
@braedensteele3184 The Beatles were the first example of a rock 'n' roll group where there wasn't just one "star", right? A big part of their popularity was how they came across in interviews. Sharp, funny and honest instead of being stage-managed and dry.
1
@JoeyLutes I'm also not a fan of throwing accusations at dead people, because they naturally can't defend themselves! One might ask why Stu's sister waited so long before telling the story. Bear in mind that it's also possible that Stu getting smacked in a fight had nothing to do with his death; it could've been the result of a congenital disorder. If that's the case slamming uppers every night along with the other lads wouldn't have helped! It's all he-said-she-said and nobody's around to clear it up. I err on the side of "John Lennon could be a c*nt but I doubt he'd go that far."
1