Comments by "Fabian Schrötter" (@fabianschrotter) on "Russia’s ‘Nasty’ Drone Ukraine's Sci-Fi Nightmare? Kub-10E Makes High-Stakes Debut After Oreshnik" video.

Oreshnik weighs 30 to 40 tons and, like all ICBMs and medium-range ballistic missiles, is hypersonic in its ballistic phase. This creates a plasma that makes communication for trajectory corrections during the approach phase impossible, which is why these types of missiles are quite imprecise. This is absolutely irrelevant for a nuclear warhead, but an imprecise multimillion-dollar missile with a conventional warhead that is recognized every time by Western early warning radars as an ICBM and provokes highly dangerous confusion is probably the most miserable weapon of the 21st century.
11
 @Berenkakken This time you only used 2 clown emojis. Is there a Morse code behind it because none of your other keyboard keys work anymore? Are you trying to communicate?
4
Imagine a nuclear power takes an old 30 to 40 ton ICBM, all of which are faster than Mach 10 in their ballistic phase anyway, replaces the nuclear warhead with a conventional one and claims it is a new hypersonic high-tech weapon. Welcome to the ridiculous fairytale world of Oreshnik.
3
@PaulTaoman indeed, in Syria Russia has once again shown how superior it is.
3
@MitzySonce Read? There are literally thousands of footage of failed Russian attacks with golf cars and ancient Soviet tanks.
3
@MitzySonce So you seriously deny the footsage on all Russian and Ukrainian war blogger channels of Chinese Golf cars, T-62s, T-55s and Ladas on the front line?
3
@MitzySonce There is not a single Russian war blogger who denies the use of Chinese golf cars. Seriously, you're trying to make fun of something that no one in Russia denies and are only making a fool of yourself.
3
@Berenkakken I see that all your comments on HT consist only of clown emojis. Very eloquent, even by HT standards...
3
@tonys6759 Ok, I accept that a minimum cognitive level is required to be able to copy names of war bloggers and view their footage.
2
@chrisstevens2899 What is a lie? That Oreshnik is a 30 to 40 ton ballistic missile or that all ICBMs are hypersonic anyway?
1
@chrisstevens2899 I just see that your vocabulary on HT so far only consists of "liar", which of course is no improvement in terms of eloquence compared to a clown emoji morse code by Berenkakken.
1
Russia is sending 50 years old T 62 and even Chinese Golf cars to the front line. It's unbelievable how far behind they are.
1
@MitzySonce Wait, you don't know any frontline footage from war bloggers, you live in a Hindustan Times propaganda bubble right?
1
@MitzySonce I feel sorry for you, here are a few of the more influential big Russian war bloggers from the frontline that you can follow to free yourself from your fantasy world, Boris Rozhin, Andrei “Murz” Morozov, Yuri Kotyonok or Oleg Tsaryov...
1
@Berenkakken This is indeed the intellectual target group of the Russian Oreshnik propaganda...
1
@tonys6759 Forget the war bloggers, try: "Russians, who stayed without equipment, attack with golf carts and Belarusian motorcycles in Ukraine"
1
@lancearmstrong9175 Oreshnik weighs 30 to 40 tons and, like all ICBMs and medium-range ballistic missiles, is hypersonic in its ballistic phase. This creates a plasma that makes communication for trajectory corrections during the approach phase impossible, which is why these types of missiles are quite imprecise. This is absolutely irrelevant for a nuclear warhead, but an imprecise multimillion-dollar missile with a conventional warhead that is recognized every time by Western early warning radars as an ICBM and provokes highly dangerous confusion is probably the most miserable weapon of the 21st century...
1
@ohgeazy The well-preserved Soviet stockpiles are almost used up. Take a look at Oryx. There are already 3,690 Russian tank losses listed with photo and footage evidence. Of these, 2,624 are verifiably destroyed, 157 damaged, 375 abandoned and 534 captured. Now all that's left are the poorly preserved old models that have been standing outside for many decades and need more and more repairs. Thousands of T 62s and T 55s are probably already beyond repair.
1
@ohgeazy The well-preserved Soviet stockpiles are almost used up. Take a look at the Russian losses listed Oryx.
1
@ohgeazy Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory in 2022: 35 percent Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory 2025: 22 percent Is this “territorial gain/loss” a justification for the loss of thousands of tanks?
1
@ohgeazy This does not change the fact that currently, in 2025, less Ukrainian territory is occupied by Russia than in 2022.
1
@ohgeazy It has been disproven that Russian troops fought in front of Kiev in 2022 and that Ukrainian troops are now fighting in Kursk in 2025?
1
@ohgeazy Hundreds of miles?😂 Oh dear, please go back to the geography class, the village of Berdin, where Ukrainian soldiers are currently fighting, is 60 kilometers away from Kursk.
1
@ohgeazy But it doesn't matter how far they are from Kursk, it's about Russia being the first nuclear "superpower" in world history that lost territory in a war and has to fight on its own territory. No matter how hard you cope, the epic humiliation is undeniable.
1
@tonys6759 Ok, I accept that a minimum cognitive level is required to be able to copy names of war bloggers and view their footage. Search: "Russians, who stayed without equipment, attack with golf carts and Belarusian motorcycles in Ukraine"
1