Comments by "Keifer" (@keifer7813) on "The Mirror" channel.

  1. ​@mrrights5007 Andrew Tate fan spotted lol
    16
  2. I didn't know screaming was a requirement in any languages. Fascinating
    14
  3. What is this barbarism?
    12
  4. Well now that you mention it 🤔
    8
  5. People voted for his party. His party voted him to lead. Leader of the elected party becomes PM. Pretty simple. As much as I hate them, it's that simple
    6
  6. A month of live concerts every night. Prepare to not catch any sleep if you happen to be anywhere near a mosque 😉 📢🎸
    6
  7. Naming suspects before they are actually convicted is wrong
    4
  8. ​ @societyisscaredofmasculine8546 Might shock you, but I hear men and women are different..
    4
  9. Well you can start by tackling these fake jobs and whatnot. Sat at home as we speak, applying on Indeed. It's gruelling
    4
  10. "Can't do nuffin no more. Freedom of expression is under attack. I was Starmer's political prisoner" - him in a few months probably
    4
  11.  @countdrakilla  Lol maybe he did mean the UK then in that case. Either way, it's no secret that the US looks down on us. I'm just annoyed at how we've sucked up to them for so long
    4
  12. Helps when you're drunk
    4
  13. ​ @superhumantrueman  Some of these people are hopeless, you've explained why it's indefensible very clearly yet it still doesn't compute to them
    4
  14.  @pedroloco9327  Yeah and I find that to be wrong. Why should somebody's reputation be potentially ruined before they are found guilty of a crime?
    3
  15. I'm with her 100% but an MP shouldn't be crying during a parliamentary session.
    3
  16. They have to say "suspected" until a conviction has been reached. Same way they can't call people criminals until they're convictied of a crime, so they say "suspect" This is basic law, mate
    3
  17. ​ @rothwellaudio  Bro graduated from Greggs
    3
  18. Did the white people protest outside the police station?
    3
  19. Source that he's black?
    2
  20.  @societyisscaredofmasculine8546  No. The law should treat us all the same. How we feel about the situation as private citizens doesn't need to though. So yeah the lad was lucky. If the roles were reversed, I'd have more sympathy for the student
    2
  21. ​ @JohnSims-xxx  And give her conjugal visits here and there 😂
    2
  22. ​ @TheBadBunny87  Yeah the teacher broke the law and should be punished. Doesn't mean we need to feel sorry for the kid though. He had his fun lol
    2
  23. Joe Rogan's podcast must not be paying like it used to
    2
  24. This is why I believe smoking should be banned altogether. Can't trust people not to smoke in a house with kids. Extremely unfair on the kids to allow it
    2
  25. This is getting ridiculous. How are you trying to imply the name Axel has any sort of Islamic roots 🤣
    2
  26.  @rubberduck3788  Passion mixed with ignorance is a recipe for disaster
    2
  27. Sorry your favourite influencer is a scam artist who admits to preying on vulernable men. The same "men" he claims to try to uplift
    2
  28. Poor boy. Must've been through a lot. And I ain't talking about her walls
    2
  29. ​ @Sam-sl1uy  Wayne Couzens English enough for you? How about Lucy Letby? Oh wait lemme guess. "She's innocent"
    2
  30. Really doubt almost a third of secondary school students are that bothered about phone disruption
    1
  31. Yeah sounds like another Wayne Couzens in the making
    1
  32. Never has been a day without child assault. That's kinda how it works when your population is in the millions, let alone tens of millions
    1
  33. What happened to all the people defending Lucy Conolly by saying she shouldn't be arrested over "hurty words"? Suddenly they've all done a 180 🤔
    1
  34. ​ @Budgeman87  It is worse. They should both be arrested. If you think either of their comments should be protected by free speech, then im afraid you're the clown here
    1
  35. ​ @URBeingLiedTo  How was "set fire to all the [fu cking] hotels full of the [bast ards]" not a direct call to action? What you smoking, mate?
    1
  36. ​ @URBeingLiedTo  How was "set fire to all the [f] hotels full of the [b]" not a direct call to action? What you smoking, mate?
    1
  37. ​ @Budgeman87  So you do think free speech should have no limits haha what a tool. So then are you also okay with legalising child pron?
    1
  38. Checkmate
    1
  39. 6:53 What the heck was that.. Couldn't tell if I was listening to some youtuber ranting about the media or a government official. These people are so unprofessional lmao
    1
  40. If it ain't London, I don't care tbh
    1
  41. Deform are a single issue party. Clueless about running a country. Don't know why they get so much air time
    1
  42.  @strangestuff1213  Yes, but in positions of authority, you should learn to control your emotions. Same goes for the police, and even teachers to some extent
    1
  43. Translator swinging side to side like she's just happy to be there
    1
  44. Suspects shouldn't be named until they're convicted of a crime
    1
  45.  @pedroloco9327  I did. I replied to you before, unless it Youtuve deleted it
    1
  46. We all heard no mention of the UK
    1
  47.  @pandorapiam3374  Who knows. One thing for sure is that headline is a travesty of journalism
    1
  48.  @TheWizzie2012  Well unless you believe the UK really is that forgettable, it would make sense to assume he may just mean any other NATO country. And you're wrong. Canada and Australia are also open to sending troops there. So no, nobody's dumb here. Apart from the melon who thinks he knows exactly who the target of an ambiguous statement was, i.e you Also, why do you care who he's referring to? Your insecurity is almost palpable lmao. Embarrassing
    1
  49. @Engle356 I see. I can always trust Carol
    1
  50. @Engle356 Carol would never lie. Trust me
    1
  51. ​ @Tropospherix  Nice döners they got there, I must say
    1
  52. Bit too much info my guy, but we get the jizz, I mean gist 😂
    1
  53. Only thing that sullied my view of Corbyn was his approach to nuclear weapons. When asked whether he'd retaliate on a nuclear attack by firing one back, he insisted on peace talks and refused to say he'd use our nukes. This is AFTER we'd been attacked, mind you His heart's in the right place but he may be too idealistic and not rooted in reality. I hope that's changed at least
    1
  54. Nobody should be named until they're convicted
    1
  55.  @Paratus7  Who was there before them?
    1
  56. Where did he mention the UK? Disliked for clickbait
    1
  57. Suella Braverman is definitely sending these dogs to Rwanda
    1
  58.  @TheBadBunny87  No, because then it's a little girl with a grown man. Use your brain to figure out the difference
    1
  59.  @Amieee  The female teacher could not physically overpower the male student. A male teacher CAN physically overpower a female student. Are you just being intentionally obtuse to ignore this reality?
    1
  60.  @Amieee  Just in case English isn't your first language, I'll go over some definitions. To overpower someone (especially in the event of a crime like in this case) typically means using physical force. This lad could easily overpower her if need be. The point isn't that this makes it all okay. It's that if the genders were reversed, the student wouldn't be able to overpower the teacher. That is it. Do you deny this?
    1
  61.  @TheBadBunny87  Nope. Not under that assumption at all. Learn to read, my friend. I said the boy here COULD overpower the teacher if he wanted to. A female student generally CANNOT overpower a male teacher, even if she wanted to.
    1
  62.  @TheBadBunny87  In most cases of what?
    1
  63.  @TheBadBunny87  Again, I never assumed anything. I was asked why I would feel differently if the roles were reversed, and merely stated a fact that male students are generally much more capable of getting away from their teacher than female students are . I didn't comment on whether force is typically used or not. That was all you
    1
  64.  @TheBadBunny87  What do you mean it's not an option? Of course it is. The fact they aren't being held against their will by definition means they had the option to leave.
    1
  65. ​ @countdrakilla  So what makes you think he's referring to the UK?
    1
  66.  @countdrakilla  Idk, but I highly doubt he would refer to one of his country's closest allies as "some random country" lol. I know the guy and his president are buffoons but that sounds a bit ridiculous even for them
    1
  67.  @countdrakilla  Yep. Irrespective of who their president is tbh. I've always cringed at the phrase "special relationship". It's like a side chick swearing she's the main chick 😂. So embarrassing
    1
  68. I don't like Trump but damn is the guy entertaining to watch 😂
    1
  69. ​ @Azureecosse  Not just heavily biased. It's an outright lie
    1
  70. You already know she's going straight to Reform's ranks. They do love a good fascist or two. Doubly so if they're a convicted criminal!
    1
  71. Why do the police allow this?
    1
  72. You're either rich yourself or a serf. Which is it?
    1
  73. Rehabilitation > punishment
    1
  74. Good thing he's a painter. He'll be watching paint dry and tell you all about its characteristics
    1
  75. 0:36 "World's number 1 state sponsor of terror" That would be the US?
    1
  76. I promise my gun won't go off, just don't bump into it 🙃
    1
  77. Lol they'll just invade it and take her back. America doesn't give af about justice or freedom. Only their own interests
    1
  78.  @silverstone0907  Nope, that's why I asked
    1
  79. ​ @demi8890 All pitbulls should be killed. There should be none left in the country. Just as we drove pretty much all wild animals out of these lands.
    1
  80. ​ @ID-8491 Off to build a time machine. What era?
    1