Comments by "Keifer" (@keifer7813) on "UK “Has Moral Responsibility” To Take Asylum Seekers, Says Former Labour Adviser | Mike Graham" video.

  1. No. Now put your tin hat back on
    1
  2. And to pay back the countries that Britain looted. Fair is fair. But nah, you don't care about fairness. You just care about cherrypicking history
    1
  3. Because you said so, and we should all listen to you. Clever
    1
  4. So let's build more homes and stop blocking housing bills
    1
  5. No, sunshine. An invasion requires an actual army
    1
  6. "Judeo Christian" you say. Hah. Jews consider Christianity as heresy and idolatry. This is like a girl swearing she and a guy are actually a serious couple 😂
    1
  7. There is no such 'right to feel safe'. I could easily say I don't feel safe living next to a family with pitbulls. Does that mean my rights are being infringed upon?
    1
  8. ​ @garyh1572  Both wrong. Hating on asylum seekers is bad but Sharia is also bad.
    1
  9. ​ @azillliasmith2734  Source: trust me bro?
    1
  10. Asylum seekers can't be illegal immigrants, genius
    1
  11. ​ @GodIsLove1015  0% of London is "Sharia". Talking nonsense
    1
  12. ​ @swally291  You don't think it's a bit much to cater to their preferences if their safety has been secured already? An asylum seeker from Sudan, for instance, might get to France and be safe. Whether they have family in the UK or speak better English than French shouldn't be a factor imo because the whole point of asylum is to seek safety from persecution/war/famine etc - dire circumstances. Unlike economic migrants who can afford to move for more convenient purposes.
    1
  13.  @swally291  No, we can if it's to spread the burden. But I don't think the person seeking asylum should have that option of which country they can apply to, is what I'm saying. Legally they can of course, but maybe that law should change, idk. Your thoughts?
    1
  14.  @swally291  I think you have me mistaken. I don't agree with the vast majority of these people here. They're nuts. I've got no issue with immigration. I just think this one contention they bring up is a fair one - specifically the issue of catering to the national preferences of those who claim they are fleeing persecution and whatnot. But yeah I suppose pragmatically, it's worth looking past that if it's going to mitigate our declining birth rates. Btw where you from? You said "your canals" so I'm assuming you're not British
    1