Youtube comments of Guillotine Enthusiast™️ (@timediverx).

  1. 315
  2. 187
  3. 142
  4. 83
  5. 75
  6. 70
  7. 65
  8. 64
  9. 56
  10. 53
  11. 49
  12. 48
  13. 43
  14. 43
  15. 37
  16. 35
  17. 29
  18. 20
  19. 19
  20. 17
  21. 15
  22. 14
  23. 14
  24. 14
  25. 13
  26. 13
  27. 12
  28. 12
  29. 11
  30. 11
  31. 11
  32. 10
  33. 10
  34. 10
  35. 10
  36. 9
  37. 9
  38. 9
  39. 9
  40. 8
  41. 8
  42. 8
  43. 8
  44. 8
  45. 8
  46. 8
  47. 8
  48. 8
  49. 8
  50. 7
  51. 7
  52. 7
  53. 7
  54. 7
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 7
  58. 7
  59. 7
  60. 7
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. 6
  65. 6
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. 6
  73. 6
  74. 6
  75. 6
  76. 6
  77. 6
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. 5
  87. 5
  88. 5
  89. 5
  90. 5
  91. 5
  92. 5
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. 4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. @John Bold It seems like we both see the "other side" in similar lights. Sadly that's what's wrong with the Country right now and why that innate human tendency toward tribalism has a large number of Americans treating politics like college football. I live in Central Alabama so the best analogy I can give is the people who vote straight Republican here without ever giving it a second thought think of themselves as Alabama and see the Democrats as Auburn. It's pretty sad down here because it won't change even in a few generations. The population is aging and poverty is spreading and everyone seems to think they can reach back to some idealized version of the past that never actually existed. And because that is impossible they are just trying to grind the world around them to a halt in an attempt to turn back the clock and not face the realities of the 21st Century. The only foreseeable future for my home State is stagnation. The weirdest thing to me is that just 5 years ago I considered myself a good red-blooded American Conservative. I listened to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck every single day in whatever truck or piece of heavy equipment I was in. Then I got a new job and worked in a plant on a night shift and didn't get a chance to listen to them for around a year and a half. Not long after that I got hooked on conspiracy theories on YouTube. It took me a few months to come back out of those rabbit holes and then I, for some reason I can't remember, decided to research things like logical fallacies and cognitive biases. After that I was able to realize how I got sucked into the rabbit holes and conspiracies in the first place. I also realized that being raised in church and listening to talk radio religiously had basically primed me to be gullible and wide open for the sort of wishful thinking and confirmation biases the propaganda was designed to target. Now everyone calls me a "liberal" or a "leftist" or a "demonrat" and it is still a rather odd feeling because I've never voted for a Liberal/Democrat in my life. Anyway, sorry that got so long. It takes me forever to type anything out on this phone and I had too much time to think in between pressing buttons. I hope you, me and everyone else will eventually realize that, while we are busy fighting amongst ourselves, others are going to find a way to take advantage of us as a whole. So if we, as citizens of the U.S., absolutely have to fight we need to at least learn to evaluate reality objectively and pick our battles carefully instead of the cafeteria food fight we have been having for the past 10-20 years.
    1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383.  @darkohanzo3075  I think you are in better shape than most of the people in the comments but two things I saw off the bet that needed clearing up : The House did not have a trial, they had an investigation. It isn't normal to invite the accused into closed door sessions of an investigation. He (or his lawyers) were invited to the open Inquiry. So that's a point you can drop. As far as the whistleblower goes : we have laws about the protection of whistleblower's identities for a reason. As a thought experiment, say you've been at the same job for 10 years and you plan on keeping that job until retirement. Your old boss steps down and a new boss steps in. You catch wind of the boss doing some shady things that you can't prove but have good reason to believe your coworkers who reported it to you. The new boss has a mobster like mentality about personal loyalty to himself but also has a proven track record of turning on people and throwing them to the wolves in rather vindictive fashion when they can no longer benefit him. You are too old or simply unwilling to relinquish your career just because the new boss is an asshole. So you report what you've heard to the head of HR under condition of anonymity and he passes it along to others to investigate. The Boss hears about the report and the investigation and has a tantrum. The first thing he does is demand the identify of the "rat" and his surrogates pick up the call for him. Now everyone wants a piece of you because you turned on the boss. My phone battery is dying so I'm going to have to cut it short but I hope you see the point. If there weren't protections for whistleblowers there wouldn't be any whistleblowers because of fear of retribution. Not to mention that when the subsequent investigation corrobrates the details of your report with multiple witnesses and the boss has been caught you would have no skin left in the game. You reported what you heard and the investigation proved it correct. You yourself aren't a fact witness, you only reported what you heard to HR. Am I making sense?
    1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523.  @corneliuslamb5033  I'm very aware of what the old argument ad populum is. Maybe it's time you upped your game in the fallacy department because you are literally using the "fallacy fallacy." Do you also believe climate change is a hoax because for the layman the best argument is 97-99% of actual climate scientists claim it is true? Just because an argument can be assigned to a fallacy doesn't make the argument false. If that was they way logic actually worked then we would all be safe to say "Just believe whatever you want because there are no such things as objective, verifiable truths in the world." Oh I get it, because Groves is a white guy. I see what you were pointing at, I've noticed it's a tendency among Wilder fans to jump to race. I've watched both fights at least 6 times each. What's your best "evidence" for Fury "cheating" again? A Young Pharoah video that relies mostly on footage of one round from the first fight? Funny how it wasn't ever brought up until Wilder got knocked around the ring over a year later isn't it? 😒 Instead of grasping at straws to rationalize your guy getting completely beat down in a Boxing match and relying conspiracy theory videos by Youtubers maybe you should just sit down and rewatch the fights a few times. Plenty of "dirty" veteran Boxing tactics used by Fury to be sure but if you think that is even remotely uncommon you haven't watched much Boxing before. Go rewatch the fights, especially the rematch. While you are at it go back and watch the first Ortiz fight where Wilder hit Ortiz with more windmilling wrist and forearm hits to the back of the head than you can even count without playing it in slow motion. I've yet to hear any Wilder fans upset about how Ortiz was treated. Zero consistency. You only care now because your guy lost and you can't accept it.
    1
  524.  @corneliuslamb5033  After being lambasted as a racist by the overwhelming amount of Wilder fans I talk to (because that is the main angle of the LDBC) I admit I just assumed that's what you were alluding to. I'm from Tuscaloosa so I didn't even consider the U.K. angle. I had to look up Cunningham after you said that because I thought he was a U.K. fighter too, I was wrong. As far as the back of the head shots from Fury in the second fight, did you not see Wilder hitting the back of his head as well? I remember watching the fight the second time around and thinking to myself "He is in there trying to beat Wilder at his own game." I think Fury's gameplan to smother Wilder actually worked against him in the fight. After Wilder was clearly out of the fight, instead of coming in with those big long hooks, Fury should have stayed back a step and threw more straights, if he had I think the dight would have been over even sooner. He stuck to the plan he came in with and smothered his own shots. As far as compelling evidence for #Glovegate... I just don't see it. All of the footage from the first fight came from the same round. The round where Fury even points to his left glove trying to get the Ref's attention that something was wrong with it. If he was intentionally trying to "cheat" why in the hell would he tell on himself? And again, why is it only coming out as a complaint now, over a year later, after Wilder lost? As far as the second fight goes I haven't seen anything to convince me Fury was intentionally punching with his wrist because his fist was hidden there. If it was then how do you explain all of the heavy jabs that landed straight and moved Wilder back? Seriously, what is the "compelling evidence" for this claim?
    1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1