Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "Occult Literature 374: Apocryphal Books of the Old and New Testament" video.

  1. The full truth gets complicated, and the church fathers didn't want to confuse the people, so they trimmed the bible of problematic material, which then became "apocryphal".
    1
  2.  @bigscarysteve  <--"Completely wrong", eh! Whatever may be the provenance of the material included in the bible hardly matters. Further, I didn't mention "the Apocrypha" at all, you did; so, the inclusion of a subset of apocryphal material called, the Apocrypha, in certain bibles is wholly irrelevant, especially to your point of me being "completely wrong". I mean, really? "Completely"? Why so hyperbolic?
    1