Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "Veritasium" channel.

  1. So...no Kirchoff's law, no Coulomb's law, no Ohm's law?! It's just a coincidence that these laws "work"? Electric current is defined as a certain number of electrons passing a given point in one second. I don't think you should get to blow up the traditional view of electricity without replacing it with something that works!
    2
  2. This isn't a solvable problem; it's a simple reiterative algorithm to allow to test the hypothesis that eventually the number "1" will show up. Some math head "conjectured" it would, for some inexplicable reason.
    1
  3. "Trust me! I'm a PhD physicist!" hahaha...where have heard something like that before. He admits "entropy" is only valid in a CLOSED SYSTEM--the favorite precondition of every physics law. Therefore, the UNIVERSE must be a closed system, if for no other reason than to validate their "laws of physics". These explanations mix specialized language with metaphor in the style of the self-professed "expert" in a bid for authority. It's the external version of the internal game played among physicists, where they have "ideas" about stuff they then give names to; then other physicists enter the dream and USE these ideas in the style of something real and definite. When factors multiply and divide, what happens to the measurement error associated with each factor in the calculation?! Hmmm...? 🤨
    1
  4. Math is a devious device to appropriate reason! Think about it, the different types of numbers: real, rational, irrational, imaginary...these words comprise the currency of awareness, itself! Devious!
    1