Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "A Conversation so Intense It Might as Well Be Psychedelic | John Vervaeke | EP 180" video.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
At 4:20, Jordan is getting on to something...but, his guest is on a slightly different wavelength, or perspective. I'd like to offer Jordan a little assistance: when you "pose the problem and wait", what emerges are responses from INTERNALIZED AUTHORITIES! Everyone you've every met, you've internalized as an authority, meaning a source of true knowledge. People you interact with often become internalized as semi-autonomous critics, giving no end of trouble to those people not familiar with self-control. Authority is the currency of truth, a repository of trust. Nature internalizes as the authority called, "God".
Emotion and thought are crude handles for a sliding scale of perception and apperception. Perception starts the ball rolling by implying actions and states that directly affect the experiencer; then, emotion arises as possible/likely responses to the implied actions and states that follow direct perception. Thought arises as the experiencer attempts to articulate, especially with language, the emotion experienced. This is the base level of thought; abstracting thought yields symbolic thought that can function without an emotional accompaniment. How you operate this quadripolar dynamic determines everything about who you are and what you do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
"...continuity of religio..."! C'mon, guys, structure, please! hehehe...They explicate their peculiar vocabularies and delight in correlating them. That's lovely, but, inchoate...poetic, even! I consider the subject technical! "Cognition is not in your head. It's between you and the world" is a virtually meaningless statement, linguistically. "The world" is another of the super-words they like to revolve around that is too huge to be usefully wielded, so it serves as an indicator, a buzz-word, containing the meaning each listener assigns to it, without special regard to how the speaker meant it's use. If you want to communicate you must hold certain terminology in common. You make sure of that by clearly defining your terminology! DEFINITIONS, not off-handed descriptions!
1
-
1
-
"Consciousness" is too abstract a term to be very useful. What they're usually talking about, instead, is "awareness". "Imagination" is the sphere of "self-assemblage", the perpetual symbolic recapitulation of the "self". It is the mirror of "what is", or shall be; the capacity to form intention--a tool of the will. Additionally, though, the medium of imagination is the subtle "energy" that underlies the expression of substance from the universal substrate of existence. So, the efforts of imagination are made in the subtle substance that underlies matter! Imagination structures reality. "Attention" is the capacity to observe; to "notice" detail. "Intention" directs "attention", as "attention" informs "intention". "Awareness" is the Tao to "attention"'s yin and "intention"'s yang. "Intention" and "attention" are the two tools you have available to use in the building of "self"--indeed, this intention/attention dynamic is ALL you have to WORK with, that YOU CONTROL DIRECTLY AND IMMEDIATELY--your "right and left hand", so to speak.
1