Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "A Call to the Sane - Beauty, Truth, \u0026 Purpose | Douglas Murray | EP 472" video.

There's no reason why multicultural implementations should work! Indeed, the logical expectation would be for the diverse cultures to destroy themselves by internal inconsistency/conflict. Even the US "melting pot" idea is NOT multicultural. You're supposed to leave your culture at your doorstep, engaging in the "American culture" in the public sphere. Those who will not conform their behavior to the prevailing culture are a threat to that culture, and should be TREATED accordingly, else that culture will be distorted into a caricature of itself.
2
On the contrary, Jordan, the majority of people easily agree what a "woman" is! However, the miniscule minority opinion on this point is entrenched in high profile, yielding to an observer the impression the minority is very large. The attribution of moral authority to this minority is a logical error. Now is never the time for exasperation-driven exaggeration, Jordan.
1
"Evil" has its genesis in the human experience of the spirit of "perversity"--the face of the unknown. That experience aggregates and collectivizes together with the like experience of others to precipitate a "being" which acts consistently with the expectations of its "programmers", those who contributed to the collective. This "being" is magnified and activated by the attention it receives, becoming, in the process, "real". Eventually, the complexification of this "being" may progress sufficiently to engender a degree of independence, autonomy--but always according to universal law. The creators of this "being", though, are BOUND to it--it's just the price extracted by natural law for the creative effort. Everything we do, feel, and think is a binding of our attention that persists perpetually in the reality we know.
1
13:00--"What's the cardinal call to existence?" Romantic adventure? Ok. But what if it's performance excellence that drives incarnation?! Everything done in the physical world changes the state of reality, forever. Nothing that "happens" is lost; the universe remembers your movements, even your being. These memories act as "landmarks" in the hereafter. The more intense experiences produce the stronger memories. In a larger sense, "to know oneself" must be the cardinal call to existence.
1
@MargraveFel Yes, I am aware of the definitional nuance of "romantic". I failed to include quotation marks as the phrase, "romantic adventure", was Jordan's. But the matter of the definition of "romantic" is entirely irrelevant to the point of my comment! How do you see it as a critical feature of my comment?
1