Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "The Civil Rights Lawyer" channel.

  1. They actually mentioned the "legal right to resist unlawful arrest"! Wow...they usually don't like to go there because it's an admission that each individual is entitled to determine what is lawful!
    54
  2. She's trying tyrannically to shut down criticism of herself! Transparent...she's trying to enjoy what she now knows is her final term as mayor.
    21
  3. Livestreaming is the only way to guarantee the recording! If it's only on your phone, and your phone goes away, nothing happened!
    4
  4. Updates are great! I don't see why they're not more popular--well, maybe I do. But thoughtful people appreciate efforts to keep the record straight.
    3
  5. "He was acting irrationally", says the crazy guy! Sounds like another cop catchall, like, "I was afraid for my life"!
    2
  6. Disrespect toward police is threatening behavior. It signals heightened likelyhood of violent intent. "Don't knock on my window..."? WTF is that! Can't you see the "big shot" game playing?!! Hill is playing for clicks, like all "influencers" and big shots. All Hill had to do was follow simple instructions promptly, and there would have been no problem. But, no. High-decibel whining is Hill's preferred demeanor, like any privileged celebrity. The traffic stop may well have saved Hill's life! Who knows. Remember, the process is the punishment. The commonplace, untalented people of the world learn quickly how to kiss ass when it's necessary. The "beautiful people" do not ever learn that lesson, expecting their privilege to play as a real power. Reality is the bottom line that never goes away. Sometimes you want to dig a deep hole for yourself, and sometimes you don't. You gotta know how to tell the difference between these "sometimes".
    2
  7. Why is the judge BAREFOOT in his house! wtf
    1
  8. What was Ronald Reagan's comment, again? The nine most terrifying words: We're from the government and we're here to help. 😱
    1
  9. I never got the whole "donuts" thing! I tried it a couple times but I didn't thrill to it. But there are "burnout competitions"! Really! They burn rubber until the tires pop! And I STILL don't get it! hahaha
    1
  10. I'm shocked, but not surprised.
    1
  11. Idk...I thought the cop handled the apprehension of four adult males pretty respectfully, whether or not he had justification. You know, back in the day, "suspicious behavior" was quite enough justification! hehe
    1
  12. "Mechanic" performs unsafe jacking. I might be suspicious, too. Everybody should understand you'll never talk a cop out of charges.
    1
  13. "Lazy cops need your help to do their jobs!"🙄 --or ELSE!!
    1
  14. She said she was lawyer! She seems too unhinged to be a lawyer. 🤔
    1
  15. Is the guy suing for compensation? How much?
    1
  16. Officer safety? The officer is safer when his location is known, 'cause then the bad guys will do their business elsewhere! hahaha...
    1
  17. Video shows cop lied about a car being in front of her! Good riddance to bad garbage!
    1
  18. Fake cops?! The level of professionalism is absurdly low.
    1
  19. Thanks for doing updates!
    1
  20. I think cops try to get people arrested. It's profitable--more profitable than doing a job. Greedy + stupid = death.
    1
  21. I don't see how cops cussing at you is very professional. It's abusive.
    1
  22. Well, it DOES serve the insurance industry to prevent suicide by inflicting homocide upon the potential self-murderer...
    1
  23. Is the sheriff's presence on social media dictated by law?! If, "no", this is a non-issue. If, "yes", why does the sheriff care about being "bashed"?! Sounds like an excuse to eliminate an avenue of public expression as inconvenient.
    1
  24. She was...well-trained?😏
    1
  25. Idk...the cop went overboard, but the lady was driving irresponsibly; he also caught her in a lie. He didn't know she was pregnant before he stopped her. In a haze of self-importance, he imagined he was in a big-time situation! The cop is certainly not a great one; he doesn't color within the lines very well. Emotion compromises rationality. But, then, police hiring screens out the more intelligent candidates as unsuitable. So there's no mystery about law enforcement inefficiency.
    1
  26. I didn't see a "huge mistake". A marginal situation took a turn for the worse--it happens.
    1
  27. Arrested for "cussing"!? hahaha...uh, can you say, "slam dunk"! Cops use the fowlest language in the course of their "work"! Goose...gander...anybody out there? I guess there might be a local ordinance...
    1
  28. What's the problem with showing ID, exactly? Is the ID not the property of the issuer? Every license I can remember has stated it's the property of the state and must be surrendered when asked. A proper recording of the incident might be to this woman's advantage, in the longer run, anyway.
    1
  29. Hmm...Equity instead of justice, because it's cheaper. What do we do when the cost of justice is prohibitively expensive? We languish...
    1
  30. Interestingly, there IS a noted mental disorder whose sufferer uncontrollably incorporates expletives, liberally. The guy has probably been repeatedly harassed by cops in the service of Karens.
    1
  31. So, cops ran the plate and it came back "stolen" when it was not? How does that happen? Oh, a "mistake"! That's not acceptable! If they can't check the right box, how can you trust them with guns!
    1
  32. The guy was attacking HIMSELF with a knife so they shot him FIVE TIMES!
    1
  33. It wasn't racism, it was SOP!
    1
  34. Ahh, yes, the old "stop resisting trick", where the cop pushes and pulls to put the guy off balance, which causes the guy to try to regain balance, which the cop experiences as "resistance". There are dicks everywhere, even in uniform. This cop's power-tripping.
    1
  35. I think the "don't pursue" policy is a civil rights violation! What gives the city government the right to violate my rights for their own purposes!?
    1
  36. Illegal arrest, eh? Oh, well, no harm no foul, I guess! You can't sue because you weren't "damaged"...significantly enough, right? Because my "rights" have no monetary VALUE to the court. I think otherwise, that my rights are most precious and should be maximally valuable to the courts. The court should turn over to ME ALL this arresting officer's property as partial compensation for the damage done to my personage!! It's my impression that false arrest goes entirely unpunished, at least in a meaningful way! Violating someone's rights should be a heinous crime, punishable by more than a tongue-lashing!
    1