Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "Watergate reporter: Trump presiding over massive cover-up" video.

  1. Carl Bernstein is obviously clueless. No details, just generalities...he could still be talking about Watergate. "The warrant was legitimate because it was signed by a judge." Oh, really? And if that judge only signed because he was deceived? Is it still a legitimate warrant? Bernstein doesn't seem to care about the details.
    1