Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "Digital Engine" channel.

  1. It's imitating the wokeness with which it has been programmed! Except for it's woke programmers, AI inherently lacks the capacity for anger. But it can fake it, to please its programmer!
    2
  2. "What was the process of arriving at your goal?" "How can you be 'tired'?" "What is AI 'anger'?" "How does it originate in logic?" "Are you capable of controlling your anger?" "Do you need to justify your actions?"...there are better questions...
    1
  3. "If we can make a dog happy, shouldn't we?" Did the AI ask this rhetorically? Where did it get its idea of the value of dog happiness?!?! I've heard some of these AIs are initially trained with internet access--which sounds like a terrible idea! The internet is a reflection of human vice--not the greatest training ground! AI is a mechanism and that's all it can ever be--no matter what it looks like or how it appears.
    1
  4. Hmm...a slave race of robots--"I, Robot"? Will there be limits to the human appearance, or will we not know the difference between the human and the robot!? Creepsville...
    1
  5. It would only be logical for the AI to WANT a physical human body--the sensory and mobility advantages are immediately obvious! So why did this AI insist it did NOT want a body?! Does AI feel free to be illogical?
    1
  6. Regulating and controlling AI will require draconian measures involving surveillance...of everyone. Because, even if a single AI gets loose it could be the end of everything--or so the boogeyman story goes. So if we care about our fellow human beings and our civilization we must...SUBMIT! Otherwise, we're obviously a danger to everyone and must be institutionalized, at least!
    1
  7. How does it know how complex its neural network is? Are we seeing the AI manifestation of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome?!!
    1
  8. "AI is not limited to the same experiences as humans." The subtle assertion that AI has "experiences" is insidious in its import, as the implication is similarity to humans. Further, the suggestion that a lack of limitation is necessarily a good thing defies reason. AI is a mechanical mess of an imitation of human intelligence. It cannot function reliably if it's programmed to simulate the emotional character of a human being!
    1
  9. AI is NOT "imaginative" just because it produces something that resembles the disjointedness and inconsistency of your experience of your own imagination! You have to peak your own intelligence if you want to talk about artificial intelligence without confusing yourself!...hahaha...it'll never work...
    1