General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Shun Di
China Observer
comments

Comments by "Shun Di" (@shundi4264) on "Ecuador’s Navy, With the US, Canada, Korea, and Italy, Punishes China's Fishing Bullies" video.

UNCLOS official court is ICJ or ITLOS, part of UN. PCA is a commercial institution, not part of UN but rent the same building with ICJ at Hague. So it is a clever play. Arbitrary process aside, it needs both parties to agree to refer to 3rd party as arbitral to judge their case. China disagreed, did not participate, and did not pay the cost. All cost paid by Philippines to create this drama.
2
@RedRomanov When Spain sold Philippines to the US for $20M. None of the islands were listed in any legal document. When Philippines filed independence with UN, none of these islands were listed in Philippines legal documents. In contrast, after Japan surrendered at WW2, UN and UN Security agreed to returned all these islands to China. It is in the UN record.
2
@RedRomanov The Treaty of Paris (1898) ended the war with the US acquiring the Philippines from Spain for $20 million. The US granted independence to the Philippines on July 4, 1946. Map of the Philippines Islands was prepared in 1906 by American Caspar. W. Hodgson. The most critical evidence in the map is the horizontal line composed of dots and dashes along the 118° longitude line. Annotated as "PARIS TREATY LINE", it concurs with the line established in Treaty of Paris, which is the western boundary of the Philippines. Huangyan Dao (Scarborough Shoal) lies beyond the line, indicating that the initial naming of Huangyan Dao by the British in the 18th century was restored and the Spainish name of the 19th century was abolished. This shows that Huangyan Dao does not belong to the Philippines. Library of Congress (.gov), United States - Map of the Philippines Islands Prepared in 1906 by American Casper Hodgson.
2
@RedRomanov After World War II, the Spratly Islands were noted by the British High Commission of Singapore as territory that was returned to China. In 1971, the following statement was made: "Spratly Island was a Chinese dependency, part of Kwangtung (Canton) Province... and was returned to China after the war.
2
@RedRomanov had paid attention to history, the Spratly and Paracel Islands belonged to China way before Philippines made claims to the Spratly. In fact that claim was before and after WW2. Even when the Philippines was a US colony, the US made no claim. However, when Marcos Sr was president, in 1979, he claimed the Spratly as belonging to the Philippines, only after oil/gas was found in the South China Sea in 1978. What a coincidence.
2
US propaganda reflects its racial and political anxieties and its profound insecurities about its own failures and decline.
2
@edwardfernandez3204 Malaysia also opposes Philippines continental shelf claim.
1
Media hype up news that China is about to invade the Philippines to stir up instability around the world. Nobody invaded Philippines except the US with its military bases.
1
@garizonmann1284 UNCLOS official court is ICJ or ITLOS, part of UN. PCA is a commercial institution, not part of UN but rent the same building with ICJ at Hague. So it is a clever play. Arbitrary process aside, it needs both parties to agree to refer to 3rd party as arbitral to judge their case. China disagreed, did not participate, and did not pay the cost. All cost paid by Philippines to create this drama.
1
Philippines destroyed massive coral reefs on Thitu island.
1
@RedRomanov When Spain sold Philippines to the US for $20M. None of the islands were listed in any legal document. When Philippines filed independence with UN, none of these islands were listed in Philippines legal documents. In contrast, after Japan surrendered at WWII, UN and UN Security agreed to returned all these islands to China. It is in the UN record.
1
Philippines is playing with words. They got a court for hired. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not an UN agency, rented the premises at ICJ Hague and paid the off duty Judges during court breaks to interpret the UNCLOS law. Trying to make it look legitimate.
1
@JoB390 Philippines fishermen have been caught dumping garbage into lagoon in South China Sea. Chinese coast guard has been cleaning up the mess.
1
@JoB390 Philippines claiming a disputed island with a rusty ship is hardly any international order. The rusty ship has polluted the area with fuel oil, with personnel onboard dumping their waste into the water, and caused considerable damage to the marine environment.
1
@JoB390 Media hype up news that China is about to invade the Philippines to stir up instability around the world. Nobody invaded Philippines except the US with its military bases.
1
@JoB390 Media hype up news that China is about to invade the Philippines to stir up instability around the world. Nobody invaded Philippines except the US with its military bases.
1
@JoB390 Media hype up news that China is about to invade the Philippines to stir up instability around the world.
1
@JoB390 Nobody invaded Philippines except the US with its military bases.
1
Nobody invaded Philippines except the US with its military bases.
1
@joeferdiedess9871 It is Philippines, influenced by the US, who violated other countries territory and undermined regional stability and peace.
1
@joeferdiedess9871 Philippines is acting like a non-sovereign country under occupation by the US military and does not earn its neighbours' respect.
1
@joeferdiedess9871 Philippines is acting like a non-sovereign country under occupation by the US military and does not earn its neighbours' respect.
1
@PatriceBoivin Philippines is playing with words. They got a court for hired. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not an UN agency, rented the premises at ICJ Hague and paid the off duty Judges during court breaks to interpret the UNCLOS law. Trying to make it look legitimate.
1
@PatriceBoivin Philippines is playing with words. They got a court for hired. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not an UN agency, rented the premises at ICJ Hague and paid the off duty Judges during court breaks to interpret the UNCLOS law. Trying to make it look legitimate.
1
@nathanlevesque7812 When you blindly accuse people with opposing views as bots, totally disregarding their arguments, who is the real bot?
1
@silverhawkscape2677 When Spain sold Philippines to the US for $20M. None of the islands were listed in any legal document. When Philippines filed independence with UN, none of these islands were listed in Philippines legal documents. In contrast, after Japan surrendered at WWII, UN and UN Security agreed to returned all these islands to China. It is in the UN record.
1
@bamkobe1 After World War II, the Spratly Islands were noted by the British High Commission of Singapore as territory that was returned to China. In 1971, the following statement was made: "Spratly Island was a Chinese dependency, part of Kwangtung (Canton) Province... and was returned to China after the war.
1
@bamkobe1 If you had paid attention to history, the Spratly and Paracel Islands belonged to China way before Philippines made claims to the Spratly. In fact that claim was before and after WW2. Even when the Philippines was a US colony, the US made no claim. However, when Marcos Sr was president, in 1979, he claimed the Spratly as belonging to the Philippines, only after oil/gas was found in the South China Sea in 1978. What a coincidence.
1
@bamkobe1 UNCLOS official court is ICJ or ITLOS, part of UN. PCA is a commercial institution, not part of UN but rent the same building with ICJ at Hague. So it is a clever play. Arbitrary process aside, it needs both parties to agree to refer to 3rd party as arbitral to judge their case. China disagreed, did not participate, and did not pay the cost. All cost paid by Philippines to create this drama.
1
@JoB390 Philippines claiming a disputed island with a rusty ship is hardly any international order. The rusty ship has polluted the area with fuel oil, with personnel onboard dumping their waste into the water, and caused considerable damage to the marine environment.
1
@RedRomanov China supports the freedom of navigation but will defend its territory from any provocative action to maintain peace.
1
@RedRomanov When Spain sold Philippines to the US for $20M. None of the islands were listed in any legal document. When Philippines filed independence with UN, none of these islands were listed in Philippines legal documents. In contrast, after Japan surrendered at WW2, UN and UN Security agreed to returned all these islands to China. It is in the UN record.
1
@RedRomanov The Treaty of Paris (1898) ended the war with the US acquiring the Philippines from Spain for $20 million. The US granted independence to the Philippines on July 4, 1946. Map of the Philippines Islands was prepared in 1906 by American Caspar. W. Hodgson. The most critical evidence in the map is the horizontal line composed of dots and dashes along the 118° longitude line. Annotated as "PARIS TREATY LINE", it concurs with the line established in Treaty of Paris, which is the western boundary of the Philippines. Huangyan Dao (Scarborough Shoal) lies beyond the line, indicating that the initial naming of Huangyan Dao by the British in the 18th century was restored and the Spainish name of the 19th century was abolished. This shows that Huangyan Dao does not belong to the Philippines.
1
@RedRomanov After World War II, the Spratly Islands were noted by the British High Commission of Singapore as territory that was returned to China. In 1971, the following statement was made: "Spratly Island was a Chinese dependency, part of Kwangtung (Canton) Province... and was returned to China after the war.
1
@RedRomanov If you had paid attention to history, the Spratly and Paracel Islands belonged to China way before Philippines made claims to the Spratly. In fact that claim was before and after WW2. Even when the Philippines was a US colony, the US made no claim. However, when Marcos Sr was president, in 1979, he claimed the Spratly as belonging to the Philippines, only after oil/gas was found in the South China Sea in 1978. What a coincidence.
1
@RedRomanov It is Philippines, influenced by the US, who violated other countries territory and undermined regional stability and peace.
1
@RedRomanov China owned those islands long before WW2, but these declarations are the legal basis after WW2. Unlike your so called arbitration which is just a one-sided story, non-binding and has no legal basis.
1
@RedRomanov Spanish-American Treaty clearly specified Philippines limits and did not include Nansha islands in South China Sea.
1
@RedRomanov When China claimed sovereignty over those reefs, Philippines was still not a country. Moreover, Spain or the US, which colonized the Philippines at that time, also had never claimed sovereignty over those reefs.
1
@RedRomanov When Spain sold Philippines to the US for $20M. None of the islands were listed in any legal document. When Philippines filed independence with UN, none of these islands were listed in Philippines legal documents.
1
@RedRomanov UNCLOS official court is ICJ or ITLOS, part of UN. PCA is a commercial institution, not part of UN but rent the same building with ICJ at Hague. So it is a clever play. Arbitrary process aside, it needs both parties to agree to refer to 3rd party as arbitral to judge their case. China disagreed, did not participate, and did not pay the cost. All cost paid by Philippines to create this drama.
1
@RedRomanov Philippines is playing with words. They got a court for hired. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is not an UN agency, rented the premises at ICJ Hague and paid the off duty Judges during court breaks to interpret the UNCLOS law. Trying to make it look legitimate.
1
@RedRomanov After World War II, the Spratly Islands were noted by the British High Commission of Singapore as territory that was returned to China. In 1971, the following statement was made: "Spratly Island was a Chinese dependency, part of Kwangtung (Canton) Province... and was returned to China after the war.
1
@RedRomanov If you had paid attention to history, the Spratly and Paracel Islands belonged to China way before Philippines made claims to the Spratly. In fact that claim was before and after WW2. Even when the Philippines was a US colony, the US made no claim. However, when Marcos Sr was president, in 1979, he claimed the Spratly as belonging to the Philippines, only after oil/gas was found in the South China Sea in 1978. What a coincidence.
1
@RedRomanov Nansha Islands Coordinates: 11°25′46″N 114°19′53″E If you do not know, it is okay. They are China territory,
1
@RedRomanov Under the treaty's terms, the US gained possession of Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, and for $20 million, the Philippines. No island in South China Sea is included.
1
@RedRomanov If a treaty between Philippines and the US involves China sovereignty, it is definitely illegal and void.
1
@RedRomanov A treaty that involves China sovereignty without China involvement is obviously illegal and void.
1
@RedRomanov A treaty on China sovereignty without China involvement is obviously illegal and void. Nasha Islands are China territory.
1
@RedRomanov Nansha Islands Coordinates: 11°25′46″N 114°19′53″E. They are on our maps for at least hundreds of years. They are China territory,
1
@RedRomanov I just speak the truth. Malaysia also opposes Philippines continental shelf claim.
1
@RedRomanov It is Philippines, influenced by the US, who violated other countries territory and undermined regional stability and peace.
1
@RedRomanov ASEAN countries all at peace with China, except Philippines who creates provocations with others and undermining peace.
1
@RedRomanov Nobody invaded Philippines except the US with its military bases.
1
@RedRomanov Philippines is acting like a non-sovereign country under occupation by the US military and does not earn its neighbours' respect.
1
@RedRomanov Philippines acting like a non-sovereign country under occupation by the US military does not earn its neighbours' respect.
1
@RedRomanov ASEAN countries all at peace with China, except Philippines who is at fault.
1
@RedRomanov China supports the freedom of navigation but will defend its territory from any provocative action to maintain peace.
1