Comments by "babbalonian2" (@babbalonian2) on "Vaccine trial whistle blower" video.

  1. There were many doctors warning about the risks of a rushed vaccine program. Look at what happened during the 1976 swine flu outbreak . Ive heard people had to sign a waver varifying they understand that it indeed was an experimental drug, before they got the jab. That alone should have clued most people in.
    93
  2.  @ytsm  It stunk from the start, why do you think there was a media campaign to smear any physician that spoke up. Look no further than the Dr Patrick Phillips story. A Canadian family physician that was smeared as an example to any doctor that dared speaks up. The health minister said his views on Vit D was a Conspiracy theory. When the College of physicians seen him on TV, well, they played right into it and ban him from writing prescriptions for ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine . "Groupthink" has taken over much of the medical community. Its very strange to watch.
    6
  3. This was actually the second Pfizer whistle blower, they shut down the first one very quickly.."Pfizer Whistleblower Leaks Execs Emails"
    4
  4.  @ernestcampbell9319  You must be scared at this point, I know I would be. Gov Of Canada website. 5653 deaths and 15,579 adverse effects and that's just in Canada: "Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada", next is the children. Why people don't do a bit of research is beyond me. They are not hiding facts, so later they can say "we published all results", "you signed a waiver". But they did a media campaign calling self research "antivax" "trust science" "do the right thing" we're in this together" even Vit D was called a conspiracy theory by the health minister in Ontario. That's why people are turning on the media now. Check out the Dr. Patrick Phillips story. You will understand. I do have a clue, its you that's obvious...
    3
  5.  @webdavis  Lets go Brandon.
    3
  6.  @JacGBoots1  Gov Of Canada website. 5653 deaths and 15,579 adverse effects and that's just in Canada: "Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada" Why people don't do a bit of research is beyond me. They are not hiding facts, so later they can say "we published all results". But they did a media campaign calling self research "antivax" "trust science" "do the right thing" we're in this together" even Vit D was called a conspiracy theory by the health minister in Ontario. That's why people are turning on the media now. Check out the Dr. Patrick Phillips story. You will understand.
    2
  7.  @koyaanisqatsi78  Oh a smart guy. Did you scroll down and read the Definitions of "Serious adverse event", you may want to return and read a bit more careful. I'll help you out :Serious adverse event :: :results in death :is life-threatening (an event/reaction in which the patient was at real, rather than hypothetical, risk of death at the time of the event/reaction) :requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization :results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or :results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
    2
  8.  @koyaanisqatsi78  There was 16,578 adverse reactions. Read the definitions,,,,smart guy. That's a Gov Of Canada website. Im not making it up..
    2
  9.  @koyaanisqatsi78  Pregnancy outcomes Fetal growth restriction 5 Spontaneous abortion 40 Subtotal 45.
    2
  10. If she wasn't,, nobody would have taken her seriously,,,look at what happened to the first Pfizer whistle blower.. "Pfizer Whistleblower Leaks Execs Emails"
    2
  11.  @jamesflaherty9250  I was one of the people bugging Dr.C to talk about it. Like Dr. Suneel Dhand did a few days earlier. Now if Dr.C could address this . "Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada" Gov of Can website,,,5653,,,are no longer with the living. I have to word it like that or YT will delete the comment.
    2
  12.  @koyaanisqatsi78  Click onto the 16578 Yeah, if you call that a "mild allergy"..come on,,,,wake up.
    1
  13.  @koyaanisqatsi78  again,,,Im not sure if you have issues with your thinking. Read definition on the same page.. I'm not arguing with you any longer. You're choosing to ignore at this point. At least you know what your ignoring now,,lol. . Its obviously too late for you. We seen this right away. You think serious advert events means "allergic reaction"...lol.,,omg. Even when presented with the evidence.,
    1
  14.  @saturnsun203  Could yu imagine in 20 years, when the truth comes out.
    1
  15.  @calotcha108  I just hear that over on Dr. Suneel Dhand's channel. His last upload. Id share the link,,,,but you know the way that goes.
    1
  16.  @francescag6889  Let this sink in 5653 d eaths " Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada" Gov of Can website.. Should that really be forced?.
    1
  17. That is unbelievable. I watched it over on Rumble. Dr. Phillips said " The health minister called Vit D a conspiracy theory", like what's that all about? No doctor in Canada is permitted to prescribe Ivermactin? Even tho it's on the NIH as a treatment for covid. Orders from the College of Physicians. That sounds very strange. Almost Twilight zone strange.
    1
  18.  @jamesflaherty9250  Are you high? Re-read my comment.
    1