Comments by "g bridgman" (@1940limited) on "Sanders dismisses idea of "limited strike" on Iran" video.

You have to admire Sanders' tenacity. In reality, he'll never be POTUS. He's the only one that doesn't seem to know that. He does not discuss how to pay for his grandiose plans.
2
2000 people targeted out of 22 million here illegally. It's a drop in the bucket. Trump doesn't "think" he can win re-election, he knows it.
1
There's no such thing as a "democratic socialist." Either you're a socialist or you're not. Bernie's a socialist and has been since he honeymooned in Russia back in the 70s. He's been espousin the same nonsense ever since and has yet to detail how to pay for it. There is no way to pay for it. It will bankrupt the nation.
1
Pelosi said something good about the president? It must have killed her to do that. Trump has not endorsed attacking Iran. Where does Sanders get that idea from?
1
@Sasquatch I'm not too worried about it. Discussing the possibility of a President Sanders is like saying the Titanic's going to sail into NY harbor in pristine condition tomorrow. It's not happening.
1
@Sasquatch You better pray it doesn't happen unless you want to live in another Venezuela. Or perhaps you have no qualms taking money away from those that have it and have earned it, then handing it out to those deemed by government to be more deserving of your money with plenty of waste, inefficiency and corruption in the process.
1
@Sasquatch The countries you mention are all much smaller with less people and very high taxation. If that's how those people choose to live, it's up to them. It's not how our capitalistic system in the United States works. There's no such thing as a democratic socialist. You're either a socialist or you're not. Bernie's been preaching his mantra for 40 years and has gotten nowhere with it. I admire his tenacity, but he'll never be POTUS.
1
@Sasquatch When you and Bernie figure out how to pay for it other than stealing people's money who are productive, let me know. Bernie is not in a position to have defeated anyone in 2016 or now. It would have been a much more interesting race Bernie vs. Trump, but Trump still would have won. There's no way top prove it now, but wait until the 2020 election results come in. You'll have another 4 years of Trump. 90 million pales in comparison to 327 million and that's not counting all the illegals who some dems think also deserve fre healthcare. It woudl bankrupt the nation. The tax money isn't there even if you did wnat to rob everyone of most of thier income. That's why it's not happening and won't.
1