Comments by "g bridgman" (@1940limited) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
If the FBI decides not to call for an indictment, they will have to explain their reasons to the public. Since the public (at least those citizens paying attention) is already aware that gross negligence has been committed and that the Clinton Foundation is not what it's meant to seem, what kind of explanation could the FBI give that didn't ring false? That, in turn, would besmirch the FBI, an eventuality that James Comey (or his many dedicated investigators) would be highly unlikely to accept. This implies that a call for an indictment is inevitable. Whether the DOJ chooses to refuse to prosecute is, in political terms, irrelevant for Clinton. The damage will have been done. The FBI should act before the Democratic National Convention, not during or after it, in the interests of political stability. The Democrats ought to know for sure that their front runner is deemed guilty of criminal behavior and that the FBI has in fact called for her indictment. They shouldn't be placed in the position of nominating Clinton and having her indicted during the convention, or while campaigning for president. That would constitute an injustice to the Democrats and would hand the election to Donald Trump. That said, there's still the sticky problem of the large swathe of Clinton followers who apparently have lost the their power of reason and will continue to believe she should be POTUS..
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
I confess that I don't get the dynamic of this campaign. The Democrats have put up a corrupt, scandal-ridden candidate without a track record who should be in jail and whose platform is to continue the policies of the worst president in the history of the republic. The mainstream media loves her. It's like a death wish. On the Republican side we have a candidate who is a complete original, who has addressed every issue that affects us, head-on, in plain language, who has proposed sensible measures to deal with those issues, and whose only evident flaw is being too spontaneous and wandering "off message." Will that one flaw override the substance of his entire platform? If the mainstream media get their wish, it will. A robust ad campaign will enable him to fight fire with fire. He can produce ads that are consistent and drum home his proposed policies as the campaign progresses. They can also attack Clinton very effectively. It has been suggested that James Comey's replies to Trey Gowdy's questions during the Congressional hearing provide enough material for an entire ad campaign. If Trump can target blacks, Hispanics independents and outliers with saturation advertising, as well as his natural base, he ought to be able to finish Clinton off. Meanwhile, we're well advised to remember Harry Truman in '48.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14