Comments by "g bridgman" (@1940limited) on "Chris Wallace 'honored' to moderate 3rd presidential debate" video.

  1. Possibly four. Wallace went easy on her in his last interview.
    2
  2. MindOverBody I can see how the debates are going already and suspected this long before the moderators were officially announced. They're all liberals. They'll pummel Trump with tough questions and throw softballs at Hillary. She'll be advised in advance of everything that's coming up so she can get ready, then she'll be declared the winner regardless of how Trump handles himself. The fix continues.
    1
  3. Excelelnt choices! We knew from the get-go it would never happen.
    1
  4. Just as I suspected, all the moderators for the debates are liberals, perhaps with the exception of Chris Wallace, who's sort of a quasi-liberal. A gay and a Hispanic are among the moderators. Who the hell set that up? The news medias involved are all pro-Hillary except possibly Fox who seems to waffle back and forth. Why aren't the likes of Bill O'Reilly or Sean Hannity among the moderators? Soft balls will go to Hillary. Hard balls will go to Trump. Regardless of how well Trump performs, Hillary will be declared the winner. I've thought this all along, and it seems as if my suspicions are becoming reality. This from the New York Times. Read it and weep. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/03/business/presidential-debate-moderators-lester-holt-chris-wallace.html
    1
  5. Wasn't Sean Hannity or Bill O'Reilly interested? Jill Stein and Gary Johnson won't get anywhere near 15% the time limits on these topics are also ridiculous. How can you talk about important topics in such a short period of time?
    1