Comments by "g bridgman" (@1940limited) on "Dershowitz on the possibility Flynn might turn on Trump" video.

  1. Turn on him in what way? The left continues to cling to straws that somehow they can turn a legal act made by the president which is bestowed on him by the constitution into a crime. I wonder what the media would say if Obama had fired Comey right before he left office, as he should have?
    3
  2. Everything is "may", "might", etc. It's all wishful thinking, As stated here.
    3
  3. Everything is "may", "might", etc. It's all wishful thinking, As stated here.
    3
  4. While it's rather annoying, it's also amusing watching them make fools of themselves. i don't know why taxpayers stand for it.
    2
  5. That's an interesting theory, but I would point out as POTUS Trump has the constitutional authority to tell Comey to back off if he so chooses and also to fire him if he so chooses, even if it's just because he doesn't like the tie he's wearing. Didn't Lynch blatantly manipulate the whole Clinton e-mail investigation with, so far, no consequences? Mueller is trying to make Trump look as if he committed a crime by exercising his constitutional authority. He's taking a lot of time and taxpayer money to do it. In the meantime, Trump, as well as congress, have a nation to run and more important things to do for which they were elected. Instead a team of lawyers and senate democrats are carrying out personal vendettas because their candidate lost more than a year ago and they can't get over it.
    2
  6. He didn't fire him to stop an investigation. He fired him for letting Hillary off the hook last summer, which is what Obama should have done. If he wanted to stop the investigation, he could fire Mueller right now and would be within his rights to do so. I guarantee Mueller's investigation will lead to nothing but a dead end waste of time and taxpayer money.
    2