Comments by "WarfarenotWarfair" (@warfarenotwarfair5655) on "Task & Purpose" channel.

  1. ​ @udittlamba Yes, so why are Arabs occupying Jewish land? Judea and Samaria is the birthplace of the Jews, their religion is much older than Islam which is a newcomer. Why do you hate indigenous people?
    18
  2.  @Sheragust  The fact you are calling Arabs made up makes like "Palestinians" let's me know you have zero clue. The Jewish people have been in their native homeland for thousands of years long before the barbaric religion of Islam came out of Arabia. Egypt was engaged in aggression and was taught a lesson for it.
    10
  3. ​ @Sheragust Blockades are not "symbolic" they are acts of war. Why do you hate indigenous people?
    8
  4. ​ @Mer1912 I am an American USAF veteran, of a country that blocked an American water way it's considered an act of war as we saw when Iran tried in the 80s and Reagan bombed the hell out of them.
    7
  5. ​ @TristanAD_ You can move to N. Korea any day now, let us know how awesome it is 😂
    5
  6. The F-35 is already testing small diameter bombs and can use external pylons. It excels in the air to ground role.
    4
  7. Yeah but you actually saw war, that was before the surge. Most of these "combat" vets on YouTube showed up long after the surge and pullout..
    3
  8. ​ @gamingtrashcan9030 You don't raise them well 🤣.
    3
  9.  @fnhatic6694  Pretty soon these A-10 guys will be saying the USAF should break out P-47 Thunderbolts and A-1 Skyraiders for CAS missions 🤣
    3
  10. ​ @Khasym Let me help you out. The A-10 was born as a political aircraft because the Army with buddies in Congress were essentially trying to produce their own fixed wing aircraft. The A-10 was a political aircraft produced to shut the Army up and deal with Soviet tanks in Germany. Since 1991 the USAF has tried ti get rid of it but Senators such as McCain and Thornberry among others protected the jobs around the A-10 for their constituents literally turning the A-10 into a welfare program for voters in certain districts. This is what is known as crony-capitalism but due to your fascination with the airframe your judgement is clouded and research is poor in the great scheme of things. The current the USAF is concerned with is China, not Soviet tanks in Germany or appeasing the Army and friends.
    3
  11. ​ @laughingseal2282 Please explain how the, "military complex bro" works for all of us, "dumb veterans" 🤣.
    3
  12. Speak it's name, "Islamic terrorism".
    3
  13. ​ @Khasym Hi froma C-130 Crew Chief from 1999-2009. The A-10 is easily replaced by the USAFs vast array of systems including the F-15E, F-16, F-35A, B-1, B-2, B-52, AC-130, and drones. The A-10 is a one trick pony and built to take on Soviet tanks in Germany. Systems like Javelins have shown that tanks are getting long in the tooth. Not only that but based on USAF hearings on CSPAN year after year the F-16 and F-15E were carrying out the majority of close air support missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    2
  14. ​ @Khasym The AC-130 is more useful as is the F-16, F-35, F-15E, B-2, B-1, and B-52. You are literally pining for an inferior politically driven airframe 🤣
    2
  15. ​ @themadmallard I was a C-130 Crew Chief and had to laugh hard when you literally questioned the loiter time of a C-130 in comparison to an A-10. You really are clueless if you think an A-10 can loiter longer as well as dish out as much punishment. There is a reason AFSOC has all of the AC-130s 🤣. Civilians arguing with USAF veterans that actually crewed or worked on things is aj exercise in mass arrogance coupled with an extreme barrier to critical thinking 🤣
    2
  16. Democrats shutting all of these military projects and factories while demanding more war.
    2
  17. The targeting pods on F-15Es and F-16s alone make the A-10 obsolete. The USAF had increased precision hence is now able to move to small diameter bombs.
    2
  18.  @CraigGrant-sh3in  Except it didn't 😂. The F-15E is superior.
    2
  19.  @JohnnyWishbone85  It never did, the F-15E is a superior airframe to the A-10. The A-10 was a political plane turned welfare program for certain senators.
    2
  20.  @RedMedina25  AC-130 is for AFSOC only. The F-15E and the F-16 do more ground work.
    2
  21. The US Navy should not be policing these waters and certainly not for China. Americans don't need imports as we can make everything at home with much better quality.
    2
  22. I was in the USAF and we were operating in Africa since he 90s and more now that there were growing Islamic terrorist groups. Ask any veteran from the period, get outside of your house and talk to someone for a change 🤣
    1
  23. "69 mil" people that are an average 42 years old even with mass immigration. France is a country of old people, it's population size is not much of an advantage when you are nearing retirement.
    1
  24. ​ @OSTemli You mean Islamic terrorists that the US military has already killed three generations of? 😂. Even Mullins are going secular due to all of the terrorism in the name of Islam.
    1
  25. ​ @FiveLiver Wrong 😂
    1
  26. "2009 Didn't materialize". Young guy you should do more research such as Barrack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Robert Gates. They are responsible for cutting military programs across the forces while demanding more war and allowing Chinese and Russian aggression. The military branches know what to do and didn't make these decisions to cut these programs.
    1
  27. Trump and RFK were denied full Secret Service packages and so incompetence from the top coupled with radical leftist rhetoric from Democrats has led to this fiasco.
    1
  28.  @richardtuxford1812  How is it tricky when it was never needed in the first place? So any of you know the political history of this airframe and are you aware of the crony capitalism that goes on in Washington DC?
    1
  29. The 82nd Airborne had the Sheridan light tank for years. This is a return to tye Sheridan days.
    1
  30. Foreigners dropping the silly Bullpups 😂.
    1
  31. ​ @jimwells4240 Why use a one trick pony when the USAF already has a ton of weapon systems in its inventory that are more useful? The F-16 and F-15E has consistently out worked the A-10. The A-10 had one job, take out as many Soviet tanks it could in Germany, thats all. It is now 2023.
    1
  32. ​ @k2_tech745 Hi, former C-130E and H model Crew Chief here. You are correct, the USAF hearings on CSPAN and the USAF Budget Overviews discuss the F-16s and F-15Es much higher close air support sortie count citing it wants to phase out the A-10 as it switches focus to China and focuses on it's primary mission of logistics.
    1
  33. ​ @Dimythios The A-10 is a welfare program on the back of USAF readiness.
    1
  34. ​ @1pierosangiorgio The A-10 was born of politics and is a welfare program. The F-35 is something the USAF actually wants unlike the KC-46 and F-15EX crony capitalist projects forced on the USAF.
    1
  35. ​ @kalgstol USAF doctrine is gain control of the skies before a lot of bombing takes place. The A-10 is a political aircraft and a welfare program not a multi-role aircraft that can operate in both air to air and air to ground.
    1
  36. ​ @Khasym Many A-10s have also been lost and written off for Davis Mothan as scrap due to damage. Play less video games and read the USAF Budget Overviews, the .pdfs are readily available. This isn't even a credible debate you are putting up when people like me actually look at what the USAF outs out every fiscal year which is open to the block for downloadbas its in a .pdf file. Just watching a couple of sensational YouTube videos and determining the USAF should use something is about as intelligent and well thought as a mom on Facebook claiming video games cause school shootings.
    1
  37. ​ @kevinhowe543 The C-130E and H has cleared many minefields by simply dropping a 10,000lbs bomb on them as was done in Iraq. The A-10 is a political plane and a welfare jobs program.
    1
  38. ​ @Kevin-zt7lb The reason is nobody needs one hence nobody is building anything.
    1
  39. ​ @Khasym A manpad has and will take out an A-10. Its not about its survival but it's lack of usefulness. The USAF doesn't need a hangar queen while airframes such as the F-15E and C-130 are getting it done.
    1
  40. ​ @ypw510 The USAF never needed it, it was born of politics and was made to appease the Army in Germany. Fast forward some years and it has become a welfare program in districts where powerful senators reside especially in Arizona. The USAF has wanted it gone since 1991. Fast forward today and the A-10 is even more obsolete seeing less close air missions than the F-16 and F-15E and yet powerful senators keep it in stealing USAF funding. This airframe is 100% crony-capitalism at this point and needs to go to Davis Mothan to be turned to scrap. Only an incredibly arrogant low IQ civilian who is too lazy to research USAF Budget Overviews would ever think this aircraft is viable in today's threats.
    1
  41.  @themadmallard  Haha, I would have to go through here and look.
    1
  42.  @SteveB-nx2uo  Are you paying attention to China?
    1
  43.  @TB-ni4ur  It wasn't just the missiles it was pilot training cuts as well thanks to Democrat "wiz kid" McNamara. The sparrow had a 80% miss rate until Top Gun and Red Flag were created. Never hire a Democrat to run a war.
    1
  44.  @themadmallard  The C-130 has far more loiter time than any fighter aircraft and delivers continuous fire on target for AFSOC teams. The new version even has missiles. The A-10 requires no replacement because it was never needed and is redundant. Technology like small diameter bombs and targeting pods just make the A-10 really stand out as a jobs program not a viable weapons platform. Unfortunately many people are unaware of Senator McCain and Thornberry constantly blocking the USAF from retiring the airframe due to the jobs being in their district. Sadly just see a gatling and become a fan without researching the USAF Budget Overviews or watching the USAF hearings on CSPAN.
    1
  45.  @themadmallard  You have to remember that military members must tread lightly when it comes to powerful politicians or your career as an officer is over. McCain was economically linked to the A-10 so he was already corrupt and no matter how many times senior USAF staff showed the Senate arms committee the statistics proving the A-10 needed to head to the boneyard senators like McCain would shoot it down. Crony capitalism is common among these Senators, look at the KC-46 and F-15EX, both unwanted airframes by the USAF until powerful people get involved with special interests with Boeing. Before long some random "documentary" will make up a story of how amazing the airframe is for the USAF.
    1
  46.  @themadmallard  The AC-130 is for AFSOC only and supports JSOC teams. The A-10 is simply redundant and by it being gone doesn't damage any mission readiness. The USAF is gearing up for China and China is building up it's Navy and Air Force at a quick pace. The days of the Army demanding CAS in Germany are long over.
    1
  47.  @williammendoza6062  Hence the A-10 needs to make way for superior platforms that can engage in the multi-role.
    1
  48.  @tylertorch5914  There is already air superiority for the homeland. Not only do we operate F-22, F-16, and F-15 active duty bases we have Air National Guard and Reserve fighter squadrons. We also have Navy and Marine Corps naval air stations.
    1
  49.  @tylertorch5914  It scares me when a community of arrogant civilians support corrupt senators to keep an obsolete never needed airframe in service on the back of the USAFs unit readiness to enrich themselves and provide jobs in their districts so they can be in power for 30+ years. If people support the A-10 you are supporting crony-capitalism. The Soviet tank threat in Germany ended in 1991, China is the current threat. Time to adapt to a rising threat.
    1
  50.  @user-bd5md5cm2j  The F-14 was no longer needed and was a one trick pony for decades. The A-10 was never needed ever, it's an Army/Congress welfare project in Arizona.
    1
  51.  @jimwells4240  The A-10 has tons of friendly incidents. It was obsolete the day it was rolled off the assembly line to end up as a welfare jobs program.
    1
  52.  @Grant6243  The AC-130U and models cannot fight in contested space but then again they are assigned to AFSOC to support special operations and not for front line fighting. The AC-130 is far more useful and deadly and the new models even carry air to ground missiles.
    1
  53.  @CODYoungGunna  What are you on about?
    1
  54.  @CODYoungGunna  Please cite your sources, my information comes from the USAF Budget Overviews and Senate Arms hearings. The USAF for over a decade isn't interested in the A-10C and Senators continue to use it as a welfare program in their districts.
    1
  55. ​ @extragoogleaccount6061 Which ones? The ones from 20 years ago or the gay and fat low standard recruits of recent years? 😂
    1
  56. ​@@jamesstewart514They were stealth, they had add-ons to defend against manpads and radar even though they are hugging the landscape.
    1
  57. ​ @MrPreparator Radar is not picking up a helicopter behind terrain anyway. When I flew in C-130s we used to hug the landscape routinely in valleys avoiding radar in Red Flag exercises to great effect and on the Talon I and II's actively jam F-16s that come within visual range.
    1
  58. ​ @SYOTOSVLOG Which town did you live in N. Korea? 😂
    1
  59. ​ @deleted_215 Farmers from WW1 were not snowflakes like GenZ lol.
    1
  60. @tomaccino  You don't know the N. Koreans very well then 😂. GenZers continue to show their nativity.
    1
  61.  @CharlieNoodles  It was never relevant. It's a political infighting product turned welfare program. The only reason it's still forced on the USAF because the general public is mostly ignorant and has a low IQ to know any better.
    1
  62. The F-15EX costs more than the F-35A. Procurement costs show the F-15EX at $115m each. USAF Budget Overviews are your friend.
    1
  63. Hopefully some of you see why Trump along with tons of American vets say, "NATO" countries need to pay their fair share of 2%. Tons of countries are not in compliance including Canada and Germany which should be thrown out of NATO for negligence.
    1
  64. ​ @DetectiveMelon If you are a liberal than you support violence, no other position is allowed. So yes, you are also responsible.
    1
  65.  @chuckb7541  Yes! It's coming to an end too.
    1
  66. China doesn't have a real blue water navy, most of their ships are small. China is not a rising power especially with a population average of 50 years of age.
    1
  67. I was born in 1980 and grew up on US Navy bases, not once was my father out to sea for over 6 months even during operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm. The 9 month deployment is Washington DC policing the sea lanes for countries that pay us zero. Americans don't require imports, other countries require our exports.
    1
  68. You need an air force guy on here. Of course the USAF knew the Ukrainians were pushing, they use Rivet Joint aircraft and satellites. The USAF knows everything that is going on regardless If you tell them or not. Anyone thinking Ukrainians are doing these maneuvers without D.C. knowing is full of themselves. United States is running this war using stubborn Ukrainian generals and poorly equipped and poorly trained Ukrainian troops.
    1
  69. There was no such argument. The US Army lobbied to make their own fixed winged aircraft and ended up making an attack helicopter as a side effect. Congress on behalf of the US Army forced the USAF to make the A-10. Since then it has become a jobs program nothing more. The history of this airframe is crystal clear. Even attack helicopters would not exist if the Army was permitted to produce its own fixed wing aircraft.
    1
  70.  @mrgrinch837  The mission is not important, was never needed, and it's Army lobbying during the Soviet threat in Germany is over. Statistically the F-15E, F-16, and B-1 conducted far more missions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Only people suffering from a low IQ would be promoting the A-10 or a corrupt politician that wants that welfare job in his district on the back of the USAF's unit readiness.
    1
  71.  @thegrimreefer3185  You seem to have difficulty wrapping your head around the fact that the A-10 was never needed and it has turned into a jobs program on the back of mission readiness in the US Air Force. This ignorant position you and others have, has enabled corrupt congressmen to continue using the military as a district jobs program and social lab experiment. Be sure of your position because such enabling could lead to you or your family being drafted due to a lack of readiness and you will have no one to blame but yourself. You can either side with corrupt politicians or you can side with the military that knows what it needs for mission readiness.
    1
  72. ​ @tomriley5790 Muslims and terrorism is like trying to separate sugar from water.
    1
  73.  @WarPigstheHun  Have you looked at the Surahs? Have looked at polls in Muslim countries 50% of which think foreigners should live under Sharia law let alone 80% think Muslims should live under it? I was in the USAF from 1999-2009 involved in Kosovo, and the War on Terror from N. Africa to Iraq and Afghanistan. The religion absolutely teaches violence is acceptable and no reform has ever been done in Islam. Christians and Jews have had numerous reforms and yet here we are with Islam predictably anti-semitic, predictably aggressive, and predictably violent. It's not Mormons and Japanese Buddhists strapping bombs to kids or launching rockets into civilian areas, it's Muslims. I suspect you are new to terrorism and we're old enough to remember the War on Terror or all of the Islamic terrorism in Libya, Iran, and Lebanon of the 1980s? I certainly remember all of it and it's the same actors every generation, Muslim, Muslim, and Muslim again. Let the Muslims prove they are not violent because the majority of the world thinks they are violent and they rarely disappoint.
    1
  74.  @fazrul78  Why don't you list American tribes and which land you think they held or so you think the Apache and Commanche tribes owned all of America that's thousands of kilometers across? Arabs need to go back to Arabia and Turks need to go back to the Russian steppe. The Jews have been in Judea and Samaria since before the Egyptians and Babylonians. Why does Jordan and Egypt not want Palestinians? Easy, because they are known terrorists all over the Middle East.
    1
  75. I was in the USAF from 1999-2009. During that time the USAF developed long range plans with the army for expeditionary forces and the concept of global reach. The Soviets are gone and "threats" America faces aren't American threats, they are allied theats, allies that have become rich due to American allowed trade deficits. That is changing now as allies in regions are now expect to field properly funded armies. Many of the NATO countries are huge offenders of poorly funded militaries especially Germany and Canada. The US forces will be more mobile going forward with a smaller blue water Navy for strikes and deterrence not a protracted war. America is getting back to it's roots as it is independent and requires zero trade from oversees and is energy and food independent. Light tanks and more mobile equipment will be the norm.
    1
  76. This kid running this channel doesn't even give credit to Trump calling out negligent NATO countries like France not paying their fair share. Trump called Euro countries out and they quickly started to increasing their military funding and now even more because of Russia which foolish Euros have been scoffing at for 20 years. American Republicans have been proven right yet again.
    1
  77. The F-15EX is a crony capitalist venture, nothing more. The guy that headed up the project for the Pentagon was a former executive at Boeing. The USAF yet again is being used as a corporate ATM machine and a welfare program for union workers.
    1
  78. ​ @catmelvin997 It's been happening for decades, the majority of young guys now are ignorant leftists and believe everything the media hand feeds them.
    1
  79. The office "analyst" opinion is irrelevant when it comes to "air drops". The USAF ceased LAPES drops in the 1990s.
    1
  80. Another leftist Democrat trying assassinate politicians. Crooks's social media page has been exposed.
    1
  81. It's not the best in the world, I fixed the title for you.
    1
  82. ​ @MoosePolo China can't even make cpus without imported technology 😂. All of the world is behind the USA in technology.
    1
  83. War Reserve Material.
    1
  84. I'm not sure why you are giving Obama and Roberts Gates a pass here, they axed the F-22 and made sure it would be too expensive to restart. At $100m each in 2008, the F-22 was an incredible bargain.
    1
  85. Guy skips right over Hitler's relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood and the Gaza area. Today's "Palestinians" are th3 Nazis which most leftists now support.
    1
  86. If you are buying Russian oil and gas you are a disgusting country.
    1
  87. ​ @wilfdarr Putin tells the generals what to do, you seem to not grasp basic concepts of a civilian government and the military that works for it.
    1
  88. ​ @Riceball01 N. Korea's military is not concerning to the United States.
    1
  89. Political Welfare Programs the military doesn't want. 1. A-10 Warthog 2. F-15EX 3. KC-46 4. LCS 5. M1 Abrams
    1
  90. ​ @CommanderWill007BR 13F is his MOS, Joint Fire Support Specialist.
    1
  91. Sun Tsu is garbage HR office talk.
    1