Comments by "SpaniardsR Moors" (@spaniardsrmoors6817) on "Elon Musket" channel.

  1. Won because of ITALY, and Italy ONLY. Franco was a flip-flopping coward.
    4
  2. Spanish/BS...did NOTHING in both WW's and it was ITALY that won their civil war for them. Hitler hated Franco-flip-flopping coward that wanted major concessions for doing little to nothing.
    3
  3.  @ERH1453  Spaniards did $ hit in both WW's other than siestas. Italy conquered 5 countries, was awarded the territory they won in France, and won the Spanish civil war vs. the Communist. Aside from Russia and Germany no other European country performed better, or stated another way, Italy was the 3rd best performing European country of the war. WON WW I
    2
  4.  @ERH1453  Spaniards cost Italy the war...Hitler hated Franco Italian participation in the Spanish conflict from July 1936 and March 1939 had three major consequences: First. Italian aid to the Nationalists played a major role in their victory — possibly the decisive role. Furthermore, the high level of Italian assistance to the Nationalists was crucial in bringing the downfall of the Second Republic prior to the outbreak of the Second World War. This prevented any rescue of the Republic by the French, as might have occurred lad it survived until September 1939. Second. The diplomatic and political consequences of Italian involvement in the war gravely hindered any post-Ethiopian War reconstruction of the anti-German Stresa Front. In particular, Italian and French aid to opposite sides in the Civil War made a rapprochement between Rome and Paris virtually impossible. Instead, the de facto Mussolini-Hitler alliance in support of the Nationalists led directly to the formation of the Rome-Berlin Axis in October 1936 and contributed significantly to the May 1939 Italian-German military alliance known as the Pact of Steel. In turn, the Pact of Steel gave Hitler the confidence to attack Poland in September 1939, initiating the outbreak of World War II. Third. The Italian Army and Air Force were significantly drained by their heavy material support to the Nationalist and the involvement of significant Italian ground and air units in the Civil War. To a lesser degree, the Italian Navy also suffered from its participation in the conflict. The resultant military weaknesses were a major factor in persuading Mussolini to proclaim Italian “non-belligerence” in September 1939. More significantly, after the defeat of France persuaded Mussolini to intervene in the European conflict in June 1940, the continuing debilities of the Italian forces due to their participation in the Spanish war contributed to the disasters suffered by Italian arms in 1940-41.
    2
  5.  @uptown_rider8078  ITALY saved Spain from Communism, Franco was a flip-flopping coward...Hitler hated him. Spain did NOTHING in WW's.
    1
  6.  @ERH1453  More PROPAGANDA/BS..it was a DEFENSIVE pact and the Austrians broke it by attacking Serbia w/o notifying Italy. BACKSTABBERS, just as in WW II their similar Teutonic/two-timing cousins, Germany, broke the Pact of Steel just 4 months after signing in Sept. ‘39, stipulating Italy would receive 3 more years to prepare, by invading Poland, never notifying Mussolini and dragging an unprepared Italy into WW II. 2nd BACKSTAB.
    1
  7.  @ERH1453  Name a Pact Germany honored in WW II with friend and foe alike...NONE... a Teutonic trait, TRAITORS.
    1
  8. What are you saying? These cowards cost Italy's war effort in WW II and w/o Italy would never had beaten the Communist then mocked Italian soldiers for ONE lost battle they were part of.
    1
  9. Cuzz we Africans
    1
  10. Welfare state and always was. The EU supports them and it;s still in the last century.
    1