Comments by "SpaniardsR Moors" (@spaniardsrmoors6817) on "The Armchair Historian"
channel.
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
@Dilley_G45 The nonsense of the Italian Navy being completely inept:
“This revisionist history convincingly argues that the Regia Marina Italiana (the Royal Italian Navy) has been neglected and maligned in assessments of its contributions to the Axis effort in World War II. After all, Italy was the major Axis player in the Mediterranean, and it was the Italian navy and air force, with only sporadic help from their German ally, that stymied the British navy and air force for most of the thirty-nine months that Italy was a belligerent. It was the Royal Italian Navy that provided the many convoys that kept the Axis war effort in Africa alive by repeatedly braving attack by aircraft, submarine, and surface vessels. If doomed by its own technical weaknesses and Ultra (the top-secret British decoding device), the Italian navy still fought a tenacious and gallant war; and if it did not win that war, it avoided defeat for thirty-nine, long, frustrating months.”
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
Mr. Brit...without America, Commonwealths, India, and yes your French saving Britain's army at Dunkirk in WWII, Britain would have lost BOTH WW's! Just one example:
Over 87,000 Indian troops, and 3 million civilians died in World War II.[2][3] Field Marshal Sir Claude Auchinleck, former Commander-in-Chief, India, stated that Britain "couldn't have come through both wars [World War I and II] if they hadn't had the Indian Army."[4][5]
Another example in WWII, the Lend-Lease Act when Churchill cried to US for help because it was bankrupt and on the cusp of defeat which is the only reason Italy finally lost in N. Africa.
@smal750
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1