Comments by "B Bodziak" (@B_Bodziak) on "Nate The Lawyer"
channel.
-
7
-
I agree. If female victims are setback, the reason rats solely on AH's shoulders. I can envision an actual male abuser standing in front of a judge and saying his female victim, an ACTUAL victim, is lying and she is nothing more than an "Amber Heard 2.0". That will NOT be because of JD's actions. That is DIRECTLY due to AH and her extravaganza of lies.
In court, my ex denied he ever laid a hand on me, and if this had happened earlier, without any doubt, I know my ex would have called me another lying AH. He had everyone else fooled and I also had no actual evidence. The only reason I ended up being believed by the judge was during his first visit for the evaluation the judge had ordered, my ex didn't like the questions the psychologist was asking and he became so enraged that the psychologist quickly stood up, bee-lined for the door and my ex lunged for her. Long story short, had that evaluation not been ordered or if he'd been able to maintain himself, I may have been labelled another AH. So, I believe AH is correct. This has the potential to set justice back for victims of abuse, but it is because of her actions and no one else's. I do hope I am wrong.
4
-
@amandawhitney6255 I can understand why people believed her prior to the case. Like most abusers, she is an expert in manipulation. For 4 years, the only available "evidence" was what she presented to the world. The UK hearing was closed and all anyone had available to decide was her TRO, her staged video, her staged tape recordings, her friends backing her up, a documented 911 call, a People magazine interview/article with photos, and finally, a UK judge's ruling and his statement that 12 incidents of physical and sexual violence had occured. When that is all you have as the basis for your opinion, why or more like, how could anyone concluded otherwise?
3
-
3
-
2