Comments by "B Bodziak" (@B_Bodziak) on "BREAKING: Trump TAKES AIM at Jack Smith" video.

  1. This isn't the truth... At least not from Glenn. Brian raised the point more than once that Trump has been able to skirt every check, balance, and judicial policy/law/requirement we have. Yet, Kirschner CONTINUES to give hope by telling us how it SHOULD unfold.... Pretty much everything Glenn has said should and will happen to Trump has been fairie dust. Either Glenn is living in and under the judicial norms of 2016 OR he's just telling us what we want to hear regarding Trump because I guess it keeps us watching.... SERIOUSLY, do you actually see Trump receiving ANY punishment whatsoever in the next 4 years -- criminally or civilly -- why would Glenn believe it? It's unbelievable. I've been able to see the multilayer grifts on the right.... And, now, they're happening on the left. Just look at TYT. For some reason, I thought Glenn had more integrity than this. I'm so glad Brian at least mentioned his hesitation to believe justice for Trump was coming within a few months. Those providing independent news, including legal analysis, should ALWAYS be straight with their viewers... B/c we can smell BS a mile away
    1
  2. Never thought I'd say this, but Glenn has lost all credibility with me. I don't watch Kirschner nor BTC to hear what I WANT/HOPE to hear. I watch and subscribe to hear the truth. If Glenn hasn't woken up by now to see the legal checks and balances have been bulldozed, then he's not as skilled as I once believed. If, on the other hand, he sees the real dangers from Trump, especially having the COURTS in his palm, but Glenn is choosing to KNOWINGLY give viewers false hope.... Then, he's just a grifter like many on the right.
    1
  3. ​ @Jamr5  It's not that easy. There are procedures in place for a reason. People who accept and spend careers working for the fed gov't take a 25-38% pay cut over their civilian counterparts. There are several reasons, but one of those is that, unlike right to work states, your employer cannot simply fire you two days before you're vested for a pension. However, most people don't start out in civil service because of the job security. They do it because they want to make the country a better place and even more often, they want to support the US military. One of the benefits/trade-offs in taking a 30% reduction in pay is that there's a 40 hr, 5 day workweek. All federal holidays are observed, there's paid vacation time, there's an annual COL raise and there's an opportunity for merit-based promotions. Working in civil service for the federal government has benefits, BUT it also has its own set of negatives. If you want to have skilled employees who moved up through the ranks on merit AND who accept 25-35% less pay than their civilian counterparts, you need to offer them a similar type of job security that unions offer
    1
  4. I have been a faithful viewer, subscriber and patreon of Glenn Kirschner's, but over the last few weeks, I have noticed that he is giving commentary as though Trump was some random person and had not been able to circumvent EVERY check and EVERY balance and EVERY judicial norm in the US. Glenn is simply too keen to believe that our federal court system is going to be able to contain, let alone bring accountability to, Trump. The last few videos seem to be Glenn telling viewers what they WANT to hear vs what is actually real. I guess if Kirschner's take was that "Trump has the courts in his back pocket, the majority in the House and Senate, and nothing but yes-men in his administration and will likely never be held accountable," ... Well, a lot of viewers wouldn't tune in. I can't believe I'm saying this, but it seems he is telling us what we want to hear, including how it's SUPPOSED to work, judicially, but we've been running around the same block for 8 years, now. This is starting to feel like a grift. At least Brian spoke up and said it certainly doesn't feel like the courts are going to do the right thing. I'm sorry Glenn, but I refuse to be grifted.
    1