Comments by "B Bodziak" (@B_Bodziak) on "BREAKING: Judge rules on DISQUALIFYING Trump from ballot" video.

  1. Of course! I hope she made her decision in an effort to make it easier for the appellate court to overrule her. She established he participated in the insurrection. So, the appellate judges will have an easier time establishing that the office of President is most definitely included. The Colorado judge is just sending it to the appellate judges. I think we all knew that regardless of her decision, it would be appealed. Whatever the Colorado appeals court decides (agree or overrule), it will be appealed to the conservative SCOTUS Justices. Ugh
    6
  2. I think we all knew that no matter what she decided, it was going to be appealed all the way to the SCOTUS. However, the Colorado judge made it easier for the appellate court to overrule her since she established Trump participated in the insurrection and she only said the amendment doesn't include the office of President (and that's absurd).
    5
  3. The judges reasoning for her decision is ridiculous. I think she was just passing off the decision for the appellate court to make. She wanted to disqualify him that's why she wrote that it was established that he participated in the insurrection, and used a ridiculous reason as the basis for her decision making it easier for the appellate judges to overrule her and take him off the ballot. Apparently, we have more cowards in our judiciary than I used to believe. That said, I think we all knew the scotus would actually be the one making this decision. Ugh
    2
  4. **you can change the interpretation of the rules (laws).
    1