Comments by "B Bodziak" (@B_Bodziak) on "Lex Fridman" channel.

  1. ​ @The-fs5wn  I made a 180 on my LSAT and started college before turning 16yo. Being smart is one thing, but having such biased opinions that you will ignore facts is not a sign of intellect.
    10
  2. ​ @WittyFawn  I fully agree. He had almost zero data to back up how his opinions were formed. I noticed he gives Trump a pass on everything, even going so far as to use "That's just how Trump is," as some type of excuse. Another go-to was, "Republicans disagree," as if that's enough to prop up statements in a debate.
    7
  3. ​ @psychosaucepan4841  I would ignore someone who asks you to "list them all" from a 2 hour video, ESPECIALLY when that person completely ignored your previous reply about Israel's land grab history.
    5
  4. ​Shapiro sure knows how to talk around and avoid specific questions he was asked
    4
  5. ​ @onix044  I think that BECAUSE it's more personal for him, he allows his opinions to override presented facts. How often do most people do research to specifically disprove one of their own beliefs/opinions? Not often. People tend to even expose themselves to information that supports their options/beliefs
    4
  6. ​ @The-fs5wn  "In the hands of Jews than Nazis" What does this mean?
    3
  7. I agree that Snowden is a hero. So is Assange and Winner. It's a shame Trump thinks they're traitors. He could have pardoned them all.
    2
  8. If there was nothing that needs fixing or changing, maybe.
    1
  9. ​ @WovenLagoon  It seems that Destiny backed up his arguments with data more than Shapiro did.
    1
  10. ​ @Neonb88  and a whole lot.
    1
  11. ​ @MrLinker44  11? Try 13
    1
  12. ​ @mikabakker1  As if "No Father" is even an argument. I'm sure Jeffery Dahmer's father thought the same.
    1
  13. ​ @lucamazzantijovicevic4478  And his oldest children refuse to even speak to him
    1
  14. ​ @mistressfreezepeach  I bet you're against women's reproductive rights, as well.
    1
  15. 37:30 -- That's when Tucker realized he wasn't 100% controlling the conversation
    1
  16. The reason it would never work is because debaters are only given 30-60 seconds to answer a question and that wouldn't work with his style.
    1
  17. Clearly, Lex had to dumb himself down
    1
  18. I think it's likely this guest brought in first time viewers and I love that he does time stamps.
    1
  19. ​ @delavan9141  I get what you're saying. That said, I also read Tucker's texts and e-mails at Fox about Trump. Tucker has no problem saying the opposite of what he believes
    1