Comments by "B Bodziak" (@B_Bodziak) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. Doesn't iran have a right to defend itself?
    59
  2. The American public deserves the opportunity to see the trials televised instead of getting the information second- and third-hand from biased news outlets! Every news channel has bias. Let the public watch the trials AND courtroom appearances sp we can form our OWN opinions! How can anyone in the public oppose that??
    43
  3. Lindsey Graham is a modern medical wonder. I think most of us are amazed at how well he walks without a spine.
    30
  4. I believe Trump is confusing "Hoax!" and "Fake News!" with "I take the 5th!"
    26
  5. Anytime Trump says the phrase "they say," you know whatever it's about is a lie.
    25
  6. Televise the trials and court appearances so we can hear the truths for ourselves.
    23
  7. Do you know what would stop people people from voting in multiple states? Each state has its own active voter roll, but they are not cross-referenced with each other. If we had one federal voter roll that was distributed to every state for federal elections, it would guarantee*one person = one vote* . That would insure that when "John Doe" moves to another state, he cannot vote in-person in his new state and vote again by mail/absentee in his previous state because after he voted in one state, his name would be taken off of the federal voter roll making him immediately ineligible to vote in any other state.
    19
  8. I can't wait to see the Lincoln Project's comeback video to this!
    19
  9. ​​ @joeyberbe3715  Against Israel bombing their embassy last week. Iran has literally been saying they're going to do it since just after Israel bombed their embassy
    17
  10. I believe it was the title of the online article that she claimed she did not write. HOWEVER, when she sent out a tweet with the article attached and writing "I just wrote and published this...." The law (at least in Virginia) considers that by attaching the article to her tweet, she essentially and legally re-published the entire article WITH and including the title even if she did not write the title originally. The ACLU testified that the Washington Post wrote the title. Legally, it did not matter b/c she met the legal criteria for 100% writing and publishing it when she re-published it via Twitter Funny how two media ouets Murdoch owns, The Sun and Fox, can have two completely different views on this.
    16
  11. Lawyers often disagree with the jury on verdicts, and the lawyer for a losing side ALWAYS disagrees with it. It's unprofessional to give an interview and try to blame it on jurors not following protocol. It's DOUBTFUL she will be dumb enough to try and use that as one of the reasons to support an appeal. I think even Elaine knows better than to do that -- unless, of course, she has some actual proof (key word: actual) that the jury was compromised.
    15
  12. FYI,the child isn't refusing, she's parroting adults in her life.
    14
  13. Is he really the guy you want your sons to look up to and your daughters to marry? If you can really answer that honestly, then vote for him.
    14
  14. Now, it seems they're trying to blame Woodward for not telling the American public what Trump should have already told them.
    13
  15. I suppose the 20k down votes are his FOLLOWERS. They still don't believe it even when they see it and hear it with their own eyes and ears. UNBELIEVABLE.
    12
  16. Please stop saying people who are calling for a ceasefire anti-Semitic!
    12
  17. With $48,000 in fines for not wearing a mask in the House floor, Marjorie Traitor Greene must be her super-hero.
    11
  18. It shows why the trials need to be televised! So, we can see for ourselves what's said and happens in the courtroom!
    10
  19. Pot and Kettle
    9
  20. ​ @ozzypawsborne  you're okay with the richest people getting tax breaks that the rest of us have to pay for? Why are you FOR that?
    9
  21. ​ @larryolsen4422  What do you think Jesus would advocate for -- a ceasefire or continued strikes on children?
    9
  22.  @two_tier_gary_rumain  She was NOT killed by the cops. She was actually killed by the insurrectionists. I know her folks and everyone in her family begged her not to go. There were four officers that also died ON 1/6. Plus, 142 injured officers of which 101 needed to be transported to the hospital -- some of those died within the following 72 hours. That was one helluva single bullet.
    9
  23. ​ @BionicLatino  If Fox viewers read the Indictment, they wouldn't be leaving the comments they are. Reading the indictment would ruin their willful ignorance.
    8
  24. It's hard to wrap my head around why the GOP continues to refuse to overhaul immigration and propose immigration reform! Why won't they? I'm beginning to suspect the GOP would rather keep it like it is so they can have campaign talking points!
    8
  25. Trump has been living in Obama-Envy for 4 years
    8
  26.  @iONLYuseMETA  You've got to be kidding when you say almost all of his comment was incorrect? Do you even listen to the news coverage, even if it's only Fox? If you rewatch this video, you'll even hear him say is ALL that's been done by Trump is the wall that was already there was replaced. No additional land has had wall added to it by Trump as these replacements were voted on by an Obama budget. SMH
    7
  27. The ENTIRE phone call IS available for anyone to listen to it. The ENTIRE call is what the left want you to hear but you don't seem able to open your ears!
    7
  28. ​ @roddieglossop3942  The UK started this mess in 1948
    7
  29. ​ @audreycasassa1683  You obviously don't understand how HAMAS came into power. You do know there hasn't been an election in almost 20 years, right?
    7
  30. They won't even read the Indictment. It takes 15 minutes and there's a reason they don't actually want to become informed. Willful Ignorance.
    7
  31. @Yamato Tomato It's still a 5% fatality, and no, most people have not had it.
    6
  32. ​ @nicksantana93  It's like talking to a wall. Look at the woman from the video. She's equating people calling for a ceasefire as being anti-Semitic. Apparently, ignorance breeds ignorance.
    6
  33. She will have to put up her own money and/or property worth $10.35 million in order to file an appeal for this case. Gotta wonder how she's going to be able to do that.
    6
  34.  @drinklotsofwater0006  Hell have a better shot at Speaker since a felon cannot run for the WH. However, I think the SoH is too much work for him. He likes his 6 hours of daily executive time. Then there's golfing, KFC and watching TV to account for daily.
    6
  35. So does Trump. Politcians shouldn't be making or encouraging ANY medical decisions, especially for large groups of people!
    6
  36. ​ @jasonscala7771 Well, I voted not so much for Biden as I did against Trump, and for the foreseeable future, I'll be voting against every Republican on my ballot. The GOP has been absolutely terrible since 2016. Disgraceful
    6
  37. They were built by a miltary-styked drone manufacturer in Marietta/Kennesaw, GA...The company starts with an "A" and their manufacturing olant is parallel to I-75 (yes, Interstate 75).
    6
  38. @Anabel Poe I was "recruited" if you call me sending my county's election official an email asking to be considered to be a poll worker on Nov 3. The reason poll workers had to be "recruited" was the average age of a pw was 74 and so, so many chose not to sign up again in 2020 due to Corona. Therefore, election officials HAD to "recruit" citizens to work the polls. Unfortunately, the word "recruit" is being taken out of definition in this thread. UNBELIEVABLE
    6
  39. ​ @stephenvalastro5678  It's also international law that embassies and consulates are off limits under any circumstances
    6
  40. He claimed he... *Graduated in the top 1% of his university's class *Graduated from any university *Was Valedictorian of his high school *Was recruited and hired by the CIA *Worked for Cobb County law enforcement *Has only one child, a son, "Christian Walker" *Has only two children *Has only three children *Never insisted a woman he had an extramarital affair with to have an abortion, ...not one woman, not two women, but at least three women *Donated $300k to a veteran's group (he actually charged a Vet's group $330k to be their spokesperson Herschel Walker has told so many lies that he wouldn't know the truth if he laid down with it ...and he's familiar with lying down.
    5
  41. But not about "'Us" only about "Self"
    5
  42. He's very annoying -- VERY
    5
  43. You do realize that "all that has happened" in the last 2 weeks is due to the storming of the Capitol. Now, if only we can figure out who is responsible for that horrific event...
    5
  44. No, we send blank checks to promote war but very little in comparison when it comes to taking care of the veterans we depend on to fight those promoted wars!
    5
  45. Carlin would never have watched fox
    5
  46.  @holdenjohnson9479  Who cares if someone played sports? What does that have to do with anything other than you having no other comeback.
    5
  47. This sham impeachment inquiry must have made even Hannity cringe for those 6 hours.
    5
  48. Civilians should not be targets. Period
    5
  49.  fattnick ,  That's a bit harsh to say to a father who is so obviously grieving the loss of his going son, who was just barely an adult. Of course, I'm sure you never, ever did anything risky when you were 19yo...
    5
  50. At 29:30 he says we have a full healthcare plan coming out IN TWO WEEKS. Well, I waited two weeks and he's given us, to quote Lindsey Graham, a big nothing burger. Trump has been promising to over haul the healthcare in the US, and not only has he not delivered in 3.5 years, he's made ZERO progress. ZERO. He flips back and forth between covering pre-existing conditions and not covering them. WHAT A WASTE OF 4 YEARS for EVERYONE except Trump and his children.
    4
  51. 3:00- forward, he is LITERALLY reading from a prompter. Unbelievable. UNBELIEVABLE!
    4
  52.  @Us3r739  Are you Actually comparing GOP Congress members to a late night comedian? Okay...
    4
  53. I think it's very possible Texas AND Georgia will go blue in Nov. VERY POSSIBLE
    4
  54.  @donnacaldwell3267  "We" are. Or at least Jack Smith is.
    4
  55. ​ @Glum1964  Yes, it's much easier to indict someone than have them found guilty in court. If Trump isn't guilty, he has nothing to fear.
    4
  56. @Darren Munsell Yes, but Trump's actions weren't supposed to be "business as usual" when it involves campaign finance laws. Do you know ANYTHING about the section of the campaign finance laws he's being accused of violating? Do you know anything about the actual federal laws of our country that you didn't learn on "Judge Judy"?
    4
  57.  @cryo9216  You've got that backwards. Trump's attorneys said they offered a settlement but James refuses their offer.
    4
  58. ​ @montanahiker48  So, you don't want the trials televised? Why not?
    4
  59.  @elainetalbot2947  "insurrection" isn't a charge. The charge would be "sedition"; Hence, the 11 people who conspired to perform sedition have been charged with seditious conspiracy.
    4
  60.  @derekcorrea8256  We're wasting our time commenting on Faux Noise. If anything, we should refrain from doing so. Let them think that everyone loves this criminal. Reading their negativity about Biden in the comments gave me the added ompf to canvas for him. Besides, there is likely nothing that can change your mind about Trump, right? Pretty sure it's the same for them. We should refrain from helping to "fire them up".
    4
  61. I don't think guns should be purchased via a website. People should have to purchase a gun in person. I can't redeem a gift card I was given to am online wine shop because my state doesn't allow internet alcohol sales, presumably partly due to the age requirement (?). That is my thought about online gun sales.
    4
  62.  @robertleisk8747  If vaccines do more harm than good, does that mean you and your family won't be getting a covid vaccine when one is available?
    4
  63.  @boodazen5746  I can't believe you're trying to call someone out for not having a college degree! Your education obviously wasn't the best as you have THREE sentences separated by THREE conjunctions. Now, go back and study the rules of English grammar that are commonly taught in the 8th grade.
    4
  64. Mathematical modelling MUST be used. We must use it to determine what needs to be done now. If course, it uses algorithms and medical science data -- and we all know how Trumpers feel about science .
    4
  65. ​ @blubblurb  That Trump knew he actually lost the election but he took ACTIONS to try and illegally change the results.
    4
  66. We know what Walker will do for some people: Get 'em pregnant, drive to and pay for their abortions, lie about it over and over, and then tell everyone else not to do it. What a role model.
    4
  67. ​ @yvonnebraun020  It's hard to believe the GOP has refused over and over to even propose immigration reform. The GOP hasn't proposed a single immigration reform Bill in over 30 years! Why not? Let the Democrats vote it down and answer to the voters! I'm beginning to think none of the Republicans are bothering to sponsor an immigration bill because they like having immigration as a campaign talking point!
    4
  68. ​ @daisy8luke  WHY do you refuse to spend 15-20 minutes to actually read the Indictment? Wow. No wonder you feel like you have a valid point. You don't know what you don't know. But, it's clear to the rest of us.
    4
  69. This is an INVESTIGATION not a Trial. When the House was investigating Bill Clinton for Impeachment, the Republicans pointed out that the Investigation must be held behind closed doors. It is not an option; It is a requirement under the procedures of impeachment. Why isn't FOX reporting that??
    4
  70. ​ @martinp3371  Why didn't you read the indictment?
    4
  71. ​ @dirkdiggler342  Last week by Israel.
    4
  72. Well, the NSA did just yank the security clearances from the gal who was appointed to the cyber security area of the NSA immediately after she lost to the Democratic candidate against her for a SC House seat. It definitely fits the same time line as Tucker "Snow" Carlson "Flake"
    3
  73. A bit like Comey announcing an investigation into Hillary 5 weeks before the election.
    3
  74. America cannot unify until we have accountability!!
    3
  75.  @jamesbarlow6423  You're correct. That's the whole reason we have the Supreme Court -- to interpret our laws as they apply to specific cases.
    3
  76.  @cloudbase7799  Why don't you tell us how the OP is wrong??
    3
  77. Yeah, we are definitely lacking in the "well-regulated" area
    3
  78. I am personally in favor of placing restrictions, like being over 21yo, on the sale of semi-auto, high-powered rifles and placing limitations on those with prior felony convictions involving a firearm from being able to purchase future firearms, BUT, I 100% agree with this SCOTUS decision. People purchasing legal firearms should NOT have to provide, show or prove any type of specific need in order to make the purchase -- Self-defense and protection of property being implied already meets the need, and if it didn't, the 2A would have included wording saying so. FULL STOP.
    3
  79.  @garyglaser8292  Agreed, and as for Navarro's "They could have called me to come in and I would have," seems lost on him that he already ignored the request to come in -- as for 0:42 of Tucker asking why they didn't contact Navarro's attorney is because he doesn't have one and has refused to retain one. Therefore, there was not the same option to do as Bannon did. As for Executive Privilege, the current SCOTUS has already ruled that there is only one person who has and may claim EP is the currently sitting POTUS. I don't care at all for Hillary Clinton, but she did show up when asked and testify for 11 hours when Trump was in office.
    3
  80.  @guenanendres7124  Stable genius? The only way he'll ever be a stable genius is if he gets an advanced degree in horse husbandry.
    3
  81. Then you are very lucky! My mum, my sister and myself all have lupus and we've all had side effects from it, but the side effects are so far worth the trade-off to help our immune responses.
    3
  82. You realize that the wall they are showing is simply what Obama's Congress passed in a budget, right. All the wall in the video and any upcoming wall video is simply where they REPLACED the existing wall that was already there. If you're happy about this, THANK OBAMA
    3
  83. ​ @WEBUYUGLYAUTOS  What's a feminist? You think it's wrong for women to want the same equality as men?
    3
  84. I have to keep rewinding because all of my laughing is drowning out some of his best remarks. Gold mine! Yes he is!! Funny, I haven't seen him on any other stations except fox.
    3
  85. ​ @TheMeanArena  If you think the only evidence is in the indictments, you are mistaken. That's why we need televised trials AND all court appearances. There's no valid argument against it.
    3
  86. Thank God he's not in our Twitter feeds anymore
    3
  87.  @unclesam8174  No one is stopping trump from his 1st amendment right. Republicans love capitalism until a company does something they disagree with, that is.
    3
  88. ​ @paulsmith2410  What do you expect his defense attorneys to say? Even if they think he's guilty, do you think they'll say that?
    3
  89. ​ @karenklores2439  Don't stay in the dark Spend 20 minutes to read the actual indictment!
    3
  90.  @dareptile2653  Right. I guess the ENTIRE world is in on the hoax virus. Gimme a break!
    3
  91. You need to send him all of your extra money. He's doing this for YOU. You shouldn't make him pay for YOU. Plus, melania needs her hair stylist paid again. $108k for 6 months is obviously not enough.
    3
  92. Yeah, hurry up and impeach and remove him so we can have an open Dem primary!
    3
  93. Me, too. Trump being on the ballot is giving Biden the best chance of winning.
    3
  94. Obviously a desperate move by Putin.
    3
  95. It's hard to wrap my head around why the GOP continues to refuse to overhaul immigration and propose immigration reform! Why won't they? I'm beginning to suspect the GOP would rather keep it like it is so they can have campaign talking points!
    3
  96. Yes, Trump was that bad.
    3
  97.  @ellier1250  No one takes tucker seriously. Fox even said so in court.
    3
  98.  I'M ALL OUT OF BUBBLE GUM!  That is the consensus of legal academia as to why the founders adopted the 2A. It was to ensure the people could defend against any future govt tyranny.
    3
  99.  @garden0fstone736  I did not say that children WANT to wear masks. Literally, NO ONE wants to wear them. Hell, I don't was to pay for car insurance, but it's a requirement if I want to drive a car on public roads.
    3
  100. Same. I'm excited to vote for her!
    3
  101. ​ @andrewromanik  Cannon is about to have her 3rd order overturned by the district appellate court. She's exerting her jurisdiction over an out-of-district grand jury still hearing evidence. She is really screwing her career.
    3
  102. "They" must be the same "people who are always saying"...
    3
  103. Yes, WHEN IS Trump going to even start draining the swamp as he promised to do over 4 years ago. Yet, NOTHING. The only swamp monsters that have been drained since he's been in office are Individual One's own co-horts. --
    3
  104. Guiliani talking about anyone misusing charitable funds is a JOKE. Trump was found GUILTY in two different cases in Dec 2019 of literally stealing from 2 charities! He was also ordered to pay a $2 million fine and can NEVER be involved in a charity ever again. Oh, and a sizeable chunk of the funds in his second scam charity case was diverted from a US Veterans' non-profit. Stealing from charity is about as low as one can go.
    3
  105. Oh, we called him racist long before that.
    3
  106. Is he still trying to stay relevant? Some tweet him to tell him his time has passed!
    3
  107. Awww, poor wittle Snowflake cannot handle hearing anyone who doesn't agree with them. Wow
    3
  108. Trump could talk about himself 12 hours each and every day.
    3
  109. Why did the GOP insist on reducing the number of Border agents by 3,300? Why hasn't the GOP proposed a single Bill on immigration reform for at least 30 years? I'm beginning to think they like to keep immigration as it is so they can have a campaign talking point!
    3
  110. I am personally in favor of placing restrictions, like being over 21yo, on the sale of semi-auto, high-powered rifles and placing limitations on those with prior felony convictions involving a firearm from being able to purchase future firearms, BUT, I 100% agree with this SCOTUS decision. People purchasing legal firearms should NOT have to provide, show or prove any type of specific need in order to make the purchase -- Self-defense and protection of property being implied already meets the need, and if it didn't, the 2A would have included wording saying so. FULL STOP.
    3
  111.  @surlypiratewench1969  The number of people claiming this is a victimless crime is astonishing. Every US taxpayer, every NY property tax payer, including those who rent, and nearly everyone with a 401k or 401a is likely a victim. As are those who had/have mortgages with those financial institutions. White collar crimes us more likely to have far more victims than other crimes.
    3
  112. ​ @singatune Didn't bother to read the indictment, did you
    3
  113. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this?
    3
  114. ​ @vincegoupil Yeah, sure. We'll see in Nov 2024 just how right (or wrong) you are.😊
    3
  115.  @Limboweechie  Limetra, You're not going to win with this group, and you're right, it's the Faux Noise crowd that's calling for her to be fired, not us. ABC did Whoopi wrong, in my opinion. First, they told her to go on Colbert's that night and apologize on The Late Show and then they told her to apologize on The View. Then, they suspended her for 2 weeks. They should have been up front about the suspension and let Whoopi make her own mind up about whether or not she wanted to apologize. I'm fairly certain she would have wanted to apologize b/c it would bother her to think she may have inadvertently hurt someone. As for this Fox Five group, don't bother trying to search for the video footage of them being outrage over any one of the MULTIPLE times Marjorie Traitor Greene disgustingly spoke and how she referred to Holocaust victims and survivors.
    3
  116. You mean until there's a vaccine, right?
    3
  117. We also don't want to be in a courtroom when our abuser, an actual abuser, tells the judge and jury that we are lying and are not actually a victim and then compares us to Amber Heard. THAT is how her fake abuse claims are going to hurt female victims in the future. On a positive note, male victims might be more willing to come forward and seek help now
    3
  118.  @karlk9316  That confidentiality agreement would have been okay IF money had not exchanged hands in an obvious attempt to keep it from coming out just prior to the election. That IS the difference. The money was paid in direct conflict with campaign finance laws.
    2
  119.  Ladie Kadie  Unfortunately, he's not up for re-election until 2026.
    2
  120.  @FRAME5RS  However, the reason for having the Supreme Court is to interpret our laws as they apply to specific cases. If the supreme court didn't do that, there would be no need to have such a court.
    2
  121. Really? That's what they want to do. I've always thought that of Faux Noise.
    2
  122. I recently got a Twitter account, and it has become very apparent that Trump spends at least 4 hours each day on it. If using Twitter and watching Faux Noise is the meat and potatoes of the job of the POTUS, anyone is capable of doing it -- This POtuS being the perfect example of that. Mind ypu, I didn't say he was doing his job well.
    2
  123.  Lorraine Armstrong  I've never commented on Trump's Twitter useage until today, but I do watch and comment on CNN YT videos. I'm still amazed at the amount if time Trump spends on a DAILY basis scrolling through Twitter, posting, liking and retweeting.
    2
  124.  Lorraine Armstrong  If he has 4 hours to tweet, then he had plenty of time to read the Russian bounty briefings and the weekly Coron virus briefings starting on Jan 6. Unfortunately, he chose to do what my teenager would have chosen to do over her homework: play on social media.
    2
  125. Yes, we do. It's obvious the system we've been using for decades is not working
    2
  126. Sharpie time!
    2
  127. This is NOT anti-Semitism. This is calling for a ceasefire so no more innocent people needlessly die!
    2
  128.  @kellykurek4491  Obama throwback? He's held the same position for 40 yrs. He's worked under more Republican administrations than Democrat admins.
    2
  129. The White House sends exclusive press releases to Fox and in order to keep receiving those releases, Fox airs every single one of them. This feels short because there is no live footage and viewers don't want to sit and watch a still of the White House. Bottom line is there's no action it it.
    2
  130. Trump wouldn't have gone. Remember what happened in Paris?
    2
  131. He just said 9lder people should be willing to sacrifice their lives so younger people can have a thriving economy. Still supporting this douchebag?
    2
  132. THAT is the actual root of the problem. Several of his aides have said he refuses to listen to anything he doesn't want to hear and/or anything requiring that he actually do something. That's why he didn't act upon the coronavirus beginning on January 6 when he was first briefed on it.
    2
  133. But she still raised $8 million for residents of another state after a statewide emergency was declared before their own Senator could manage to return from Cancun.
    2
  134.  @davidpaglia1326  No, but trying to discredit a latin woman by saying she slings tacos actually IS racist. You Trumpers are so used to saying it behind closed doors that you often forget to mind what you say when in public.
    2
  135. He's a GOLDMINE!
    2
  136. I am fairly certain that if Obama wanted to give Biden advice, especially criticism, he'd simply pick up the phone. How gullible can you be?
    2
  137.  @FamILYwomen  Exactly. They are saying ABC cut "the" soundbite before airing it, but ABC has given no indication this actually happened. If you'll notice, Fox doesn't even say what Obama's supposedly said as a "criticism of Biden's policy." Then, as the icing for the average, rabid Faux Noise viewer, they bring it full circle by bringing up AOC. It seems completely lost on Fox viewers that Obama would simply pick up the phone if he wanted to give his former VP advice, including criticism. Fox's sheep are the most obedient and gullible-- that's for sure.
    2
  138. Well, when the GOP insisted on slashing the budget of the Border Patrol and cut 3,300 border security positions at the southern border, what were we expecting to happen? It seems they'd rather keep immigration reform as a campaign promise year-after-year than actually put forth any type of reform bill. They haven't proposed one in over 30 years!
    2
  139. Yes, and that's why Trump's trials need to be televised. The public can view the proceedings and form their own opinions!
    2
  140.  @horrorgirl688  Unfortunately, Australia is likely the only place that might actually follow it up. I know the US won't. Bits not usually difficult to prove a lie was told, it's proving the lie was egregious enough to change the outcome of the case. With the verdict favoring JD, there's little chance of that. However, it was brought to her lawyers' attention during Discovery about having the two different sets of duplicate pics with different dates for different incidents being in separate exhibits and they still chose to move to admit them into evidence. Her attorneys should be sanctioned for that. I hope it's reported. Dr. Speigel also needs to be reported to the APA. His expert witness status needs to be challenged, as well. Even a lay person knows you can't do a psyche evaluation on someone by watching him act in commercials and movies. As soon as he called JD an idiot during his deposition, he should have been replaced. Did Bredehoft and Rottenborn think Ben Chew wouldn't notice that?
    2
  141. Oh, so it's okay to censure only the people you think should be censured??
    2
  142. ​ @gheyjoojeh trump? Is that you?
    2
  143.  @savanahmclary4465  Grab a Webster's and look up sarcasm. Jeez!
    2
  144. It will never match the ignorance of the right.
    2
  145. Jack Smith is arraigning down on Trump's charade! Finally...
    2
  146. Trump was a card carrying Democrat for over 5 decades.
    2
  147. At 1:58: I'm no Hillary fan, but that was a kick-arse reply she had.
    2
  148. Gutfeld is the most annoying persona on fox.
    2
  149.  @UncleEbenezer77  Same, and this will be the first year that I can recall that I won't be voting Libertarian nor Independent. I'll be all blue in Nov
    2
  150. The $6B is still frozen in Hong Kong banks.
    2
  151. I hope she files for an appeal because when the appellate judges deny it, the bond can pay JD. Everyone talks big about appealing in these type of civil cases with big awards, but that's usually prior to understanding the entire process
    2
  152. That's because in NYS, you have the "Working NY Families" party and they chose to have some of the Democrats' candidates on their ticket. You can still only vote for one person per office.
    2
  153.  @club4ghz  Fist, she didn't say what the type of illegal weapon it was that Russia is using. So, how do you know she was talking about carpet bombs?
    2
  154. An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    2
  155. They can reach Israel, easily. Iran has multiple missiles that can reach Israel
    2
  156. Awww, poor little snowflake cannot handle someone with a different opinion. WOW.
    2
  157.  @circusbrains  HaHaHa! You've been crying about something as simple as wearing a mask while you're inside a grocery store. How much more "Snowflake"' could you possibly get?! Ive been giggling about the sheer irony of you actual snowflakes calling anyone else a snowflake. No wonder you are t able to see Trump for who and what he is -- you aren't even able to recognize your own issues! Oh, the Republican Trail of Tears coming in November. You're going to be so puzzled at just how many people would rather have a president that's clearly on the dementia path and probably isn't even capable of going by himself to a grocery store with a small list than they would have another 4 years of a POtuS who is a danger to our nation. Think about that! It's not lost on those of us that plan on voting Biden in November. It should a wake-up call for every Trump supporter: If Dems & Independents don't even bother defending Biden as not having the beginning/first phase of dementia. We actually agree with many statements about Biden. That alone should give pause to every single Trump supporter: Nearly 50% of us have this far decided a president showing age-related mental deteriorations is preferable to having a dangerously narcissistic president. We cannot All be wrong. Think about that.
    2
  158.  @garretdrake2347  It has already been debated and a conclusion was reached, rather quickly, that the founders were not implying that only members of the militia were being granted the right to bear arms. It became a mute point decades ago
    2
  159.  @deplorable_bitter_clinger7482  You are 100% incorrect. Bill Clinton's Impeachment investigation was also done behind closed doors! Look it up!
    2
  160.  @deplorable_bitter_clinger7482  You are 100% incorrect to the impeachment investigation hearings being open. The Clinton impeachment hearings on the House were NOT televised and only the committee members were allowed to be present. Make sure that you are looking at the House's Investigation hearing into purgery. The Start investigation is when Clinton perjured himself under oath. Following that, the House Impeachment hearing to determine if he did commit perjury was closed.
    2
  161. If the right is turning on Graham, he's completely done for
    2
  162. An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    2
  163. AND board ON TIME!
    2
  164. Trump AND Clinton should both spend time in a prison cell. It's NOT simply one OR the other. Both have committed felonies. If you can't see Trump has attempted to obstruct justice several times then you're closing your eyes and ears to the facts and simply listening to TV commentators (I'm NOT talking about journalists nor anchors reading factual news, but personal opinion-based, political commentators like Hannity, Anderson, etc) Of course, Iran-Contra should've netted more in prison, but the guilty almost always find a way to wiggle out if they're powerful enough.
    2
  165. Said no faux noise viewer ever
    2
  166.  @magalymendoza9653  His ADULT children. They are 40+ yr olds. They just happen to have worked for the same company and participated in the same financial crimes. The TO was criminal enterprise with a small real estate business on the side
    2
  167.  @craigslist9176  it's not a magistrate judge.
    2
  168. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    2
  169.  @keyfield8967  Justify to yourself however you like, but your comment is literally a racist one.
    2
  170. He has loads of free executive time every day
    2
  171.  @kayla2794  Because, it's not just about an individual; It's about PR as a whole and how the govt failed the entire island.
    2
  172.  Alexandra the Not So Great  That is not true. Those "female students" going to school in AZ that are from CA are not allowed to vote in any AZ election. Their voting districts are in CA.
    2
  173.  Alexandra the Not So Great  Then they did so against state a federal law. I wonder if any of them are receiving federal aid: grants and/or loans. If what you say is true, the media should dig into this a little bit more. Thankfully, I don't see her pulling it off in November. I pray not, anyway!
    2
  174. Nearly every American reading this comment is a US citizen because at least one relative was an immigrant to the US. It's the reappearing thread of every Republican politician and every Trump follower: Good for thou but not for thee.
    2
  175. So, THATS your take-away... Nothing about Russian bounties on American soldiers' heads? You've learned to deflect as well as Trump and Faux Noise!
    2
  176. ​ @jocktulloch3499 Now that the Democrats have called for televising the trials, I'm sure Maga is trying to figure out a "valid" reason not to do it. EVERYONE should want the transparency a televised trial will bring!
    2
  177.  @vivalarazausarmyvet4453  The truth always seems to trigger Hannity and Tucker.
    2
  178.  @arthurgibbons7401  You have definitely mastered the art of deflection. Why don't you try asking something that doesn't involve whataboutisms. Then, you might learn something
    2
  179.  @arthurgibbons7401 Surely, you realize that it's nearly impossible to get trump and the 202 Election out of ones mind given how often Trump and Fox opinion-ators discuss it. First, it was Trump would change the world beginning in 2916; Then, Hillary would be arrested on some Friday at 8:15am; Then, Trump would win again on 2020 to finish the job he began in 2016. The ONLY people connected to a political group that was and/or is currently being investigated for child trafficking are Trump's buddy Epstein and Trump's biggest supporter, Gaetz. It seems to me that your "Q" has several details confused. It's not the democrats that need monitoring and reigning in, it's republican. Meanwhile, you should try going on a food fast UNTIL one of Q's recent "predictions" actually comes true. Sadly, it doubtful anyone will be able to wait around THAT long. N
    2
  180. Sounds about Trump.
    2
  181.  @TheKolen2434  You're kidding, I presume.
    2
  182. His ego is what drives him. How can you not see that!
    2
  183.  @natalyasturn  But, it's not good for the US to simply lay down for Putin. From the decades of KNOWledge we have about Putin, we KNOW he cannot be trusted. Period.
    2
  184.  @tiredofit1968  No worries. I was genuinely asking because I couldn't recall that wording, but if it is there, I wanted to narrow down the most efficient way (search terms) to find it. That said, I do think "self-defense/self-preservation is an implied god-given right" -- (to include everyone's beliefs, I say "god-given" meaning either by your Creator or given to you instinctually by nature).
    2
  185.  @rickb.4168  Yes, prohibition is just one of many examples of changes, including limitations and exclusions, of our laws and rights being implemented. Even the rights to the "pursuits of life and liberty" can be and are legally taken away. Every right we are legally afforded is subject to being taken away. That's why the requirements to amend any part of our constitution exist.
    2
  186.  @tiredofit1968  It becomes a mute point getting side-tracked with someone who does not believe in the existence of a Creator. For those that believe there is not, it seems perfectly reasonable for them to substitute "God-given" with "instinctually inspired" or "inspired/provided by nature". Otherwise, there no point in continuing the discussion with them, at least in my humble opinion.
    2
  187.  @tiredofit1968  Thank you for remaining so respectful in your replies not only to me, but to others, as well.
    2
  188.  @leohernandez1590  It was openly debated in front of the US Supreme Court several decades ago in regards to whether the right to bear arms was referencing the right towards the members of the militia or the members of the public. It did not take the SC very long to determine that it was intended for members of the public. If memory serves me, the Justices' legal reasoning was that the Bill of Rights, by design, are guarantees individual members of the public hold and the B of R was not written to guarantee the government, including it's well-regulated militia, anything.
    2
  189.  @tiredofit1968  Yes, but the founders included the term "well-regulated" to describe the referenced militia. It's also already been determined that the Bill of Rights were written as guarantees of individuals. So, it's a mute point if the 2A was intended to provide a right to bear as to a government organized militia or to individuals. It, like all of the rights, are granted to individuals. Also, I believe it has been determined that at the time of writing, "well-regulated militia" meant simply an army of able-bodied men tasked with defending our new nation against invaders -- I'm probably not doing the definition justice, but I hope my intent is evident.
    2
  190. He is ANNOYING
    2
  191. You, poor wittle Snowflake-- You just cannot handle hearing someone who doesn't agree with you. How sad.
    2
  192.  @garsm2290  "Fake News" from the mouths of Faux Noise viewers, including Trump, is getting mighty old.
    2
  193. I agree. For the very first time in our history, the SCOTUS revoked one of our rights. That's definitely moving away from Freedom. The longest serving justice just gave us a heads-up and told us that every one of our due process rights in OUR Constitution should be reviewed for revocation, as well. This is how it starts -- losing one right at a time.
    2
  194. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    2
  195.  @garden0fstone736  Please allow me to let you in on a secret: No one WANTS to wear a mask and no one actually enjoys getting a shot, but as a whole, the public, including individuals, must abide by established laws/rules/protocols in place under any Democratic Republic society to flourish, including ours/USA's. In order to actually have that type of a functioning society, the society's individual members, even collectively, are not given the legal authority to devise, amend, and/or abolish the laws of their choosing nor are individuals, even collectively, provided with any authority to pick and choose which laws should and shouldn't require adherence. THIS is the CORNERSTONE of our/US Constitution. In order to alter an existing law or to establish an entirely new law, our constitution requires member of Congress/elected legislators to follow legislation procedures. While you may personally feel quite strong over mask mandates in public schools, our republic cannot allow individuals to waiver from the rules/laws in place without being held legally accountable. Based solely on the letter of the law, you and I don't have the right to legally exempt ourselves from any law/rule we don't like/disagree. I do hope you can look at my comment objectively because the most basic definition of "society" requires rules and laws first be established. In the US, we accomplish this via our elected officials/legislators. When we start allowing people to individually pick and choose which laws, procedures and protocols applies to those individuals, means that society is not a functioning one.
    2
  196. Said every previous generation.
    2
  197.  @civildiscourse2000  I'd prefer not only a block of wood to Trump I'd prefer an invisible block of wood over Trump. At least we wouldn't be fed harmful lies and misinformation... However, I'm sure Faux Noise would figure out some way to spin "nothingness".
    2
  198. Why do you think he's running? Trump won't use him for anything because Ramaswarmy might take some of the limelight away.
    2
  199.  @AnnaLVajda  I was admitted unconscious during a heart attack and after recovering and about to be discharged, I was informed I was put on a "hold" due to my alcohol level & I was being sent to an alcohol & drug rehab facility. I was held in the hospital for 4 additional days. I had a hospital employee assigned to stay with me 24 hrs/day in my room, I was allowed no visitors due to covid & the phone was removed from my hispital room. It wasn't until i had a compassionate nurse that pulled this lab report showing my supposed alcohol level. The hospital psychiatrist had used the wrong lab report. I was discharged within 2 hrs. I got no apology, but I did leave with a $41,000 bill.. This just happened a couple of months ago and I'm still deciding what to do about it.
    2
  200.  @chaznonya4  It is not half as deadly as the flu. It is actually over 10btimes more deadlier AND it's three times as contagious. You moron.
    2
  201.  @tferg8248  All I hear from these women in this segment is jealousy.
    2
  202. Now this lt gov wants all older people to sacrifice their lives to the Coronavirus in order to have a vibrant economy. Well, Patrick, how about you go first? Eh?
    2
  203.  @leancuisine6443  OR is he too ignorant to know that "American" isn't a race? Black and White people, along with people of Asian decent live in every country on our planet. There's obviously an issue when a White American feels the need to tell a Black American to ignore his own race as though through that acknowledgment his race is inherently"less than" in some way. Have you ever heard someone correct a caucasian who says, "I'm a White American," by telling them they don't need to acknowledge the "white" part? No, you don't, because being White isn't viewed as a negative. If you are not able to understand what I have written, it's because it's rooted in systemic racism -- racism that you don't believe exists because YOU are unable to see it. However, just b/c YOU are unable to see it, does not mean it isn't true and happening.
    2
  204.  @neoplasmax  What you are proposing is a dictator.
    2
  205. How ANYONE can refuse to watch the 1/6 hearings and STILL believe themself to be a patriot is beyond me.
    2
  206. ​@williamkumpf2682 Wrong
    2
  207.  @wife97  Why can't the WH simply release the actual recording of the phone call instead of a fragmented, non-verbatim transcript??
    2
  208. ​ @priceisright1580 They have a standing policy that federal criminal trials and courtroom appearances are not televised nor video/audio recorded. However, they made an exception for Watergate. They'll likely do so for Trump's.
    2
  209.  Chris S  Both, actually and they won't be wrong
    2
  210.  @hankpatriot5227  Definition of being a sheep
    2
  211.  @stormysyndrome7043  It's showing 9 now and there are 7 replies. IF there's a spam comment that enough people report to push YT controllers to look at the comment for deletion, those deleted comments stay in the count total. This came about with one of the recent YT updates. I think it's supposed to give more transparency about how many comments are deleted. I don't know if it was intended by design, but if you post a comment and later delete it, it stays in the total count, as well. Actually, I should say that's been the case for a handful of comments I've deleted over the last couple of months.
    2
  212. ​ @Johndoe345-k2d  To be fair, that's not hard to do, and I have a great respect for President Carter.... I am biased because I worked for him, post-presidency.
    2
  213. Wow. You can sure call names. You must be junior or even Senior!
    2
  214. ​ @jszorc3488  Actually, Biden has done a much better job than the majority of us who voted for him expected. That said, most of us would not like him to run again because of his age. I think Trump is too old, as well, but I have more faith in the cabinet Biden chooses for his second term than I ever would Trump's second term choices. Trump will just surround himself with idiots like Rudy and Powell -- people who will only say "Yes".
    2
  215. Reading these comments and almost every Faux Noise viewer us not focused on whether or not Trump allowed it to continue to happen... No! They're concerned with who leaked the info and/or why Donna B is on here... WOW. In 3.5 short years, the sheep have managed to gain a new skill-set: Deflect! Deflect! Deflect! "Oh, LOOK! I see something shiny!
    2
  216. No, that money is still in the hong Kong bank.
    2
  217. Julian Assange, possibly-- he hasn't had his day in court yet, but not Stone. Stone was convicted on 7 felonies.
    2
  218. ​ @section2financialintellige401  Partisan was used correctly.
    2
  219. Faux Noise
    2
  220.  @Ranger1PresentsVirtualRealms  You have no idea what you're talking about son. Even fortune 100 companies are not a party to 5800 lawsuits.
    2
  221. Hmmm. You didn't seem to mind when Facebook allowed Russian misinformation helping to get trump elected.
    2
  222. Then you haven't watched many Faux Noise videos on YT.
    2
  223. Yes! Get rid of the electoral college ! Who gets the most votes wins the election. Simple as that!
    2
  224. You do realize that Vivek coming off of Colorado's ballot was inevitable anyway, right?
    2
  225.  @wademitchell3817  Yep, and the GOP in Congress has adamantly refused to allow federal oversight of federal elections.
    2
  226.  @davidbaker1918  Hey, I think we've finally found some common ground with Maga -- I fully agree with the OP. Pull ALL the Republican candidates off the ballots. Works for me!
    2
  227.  @DB-ml7bb  so, tell us. What did he lie about in his comments? Trump was a lifelong Democrat until he decided to run!
    2
  228.  @dothemathemathics7537  Yes! Many people have been involved. Thanks definitely go to trump for being so proactive about getting it past clinicals and on the market! I do wish he was more proactive about getting people, mostly Republicans, vaccinated. I still don't understand why his vaccination was so secretive/done "in the cover of night""!!. Any thoughts??
    2
  229. You're right. Trump would have finished pulling us out of NATO & Putin could have taken Urkraine in a few days.
    2
  230. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative. We haven't seen Fox follow-up now have we sweetie? All the other networks did...
    1
  231. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  232. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  233. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions?
    1
  234. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  235. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  236. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions?
    1
  237. A leak? Really? Maybe, except the leak wouldn't have been from Hillary's side! BWAHAHAHA.
    1
  238. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now-- even though he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions?
    1
  239. I APPRECIATE the CDC WAITING until the data came in instead of just going with what MIGHT feel okay. Cruz is an abomination in the political world.
    1
  240.  Ron Benghazi Hedlund and Reality
    1
  241.  @outdoorloser4340  Tucker shoots fish in a barrel 5 nights a week. OF COURSE, hes going to injure one. HOWEVER, as this case was updated early this morning, the NSA who signed the order was a trump appointee to the top clearance of the NSA's cyber security division. She was a first time republican candidate for an open House seat in SC and was trump promoted. She lost to the democrat challenger. Her NSA security clearance(s) was yanked last night. Tucker should call Trump and ask him.
    1
  242. An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    1
  243.  @mR-dc4oq  What, exactly, was he doing that Biden did?
    1
  244.  @mR-dc4oq  Hey, I'm all for justice. If either or both of the Bidens broke the law, then indict them and put them on trial. The same goes for Hillary. But, when does the "Other people did it" defense end? Trump based much of his campaign around Hillary breaking protocol by not using a WH server for her email communications. You're so distraught over her doing it, that you want her to go to prison for it. Well, Ivanka was caught doing the EXACT same thing and if anyone should have known better, it was Ivanka. You want Hillary in prison, then Ivanka needs to be indicted for the same offense. In fact, Ivanka is likely even more culpable given that she spent 2 years pointing out Hillary. What anyone else did is a separate issue and should be dealt with accordingly. It shouldn't give Trump a pass. Why should it? I can't fight a speeding ticket with the defense: I admit I was going 20 mph higher than what was posted, but since other people speed without getting caught, I am not guilty of speeding.
    1
  245.  @ritamccartt-kordon283  So, that's your defense? Because it was handed over prior to the deadline the information doesn't matter. Hahaha
    1
  246.  @ritamccartt-kordon283  It ALL came out that TRUMP'S administration just completely cleared Hillary of ANY wrong doing on the 9th of January. What makes you think Trump isn't blowing smoke up your arse about Biden in order to downgrade him in the polls. Did you read that: TRUMPS OWN ADMIN cleared her of everything --there was absolutely nothing there. I'm not a Hillary fan and did not and would not vote for her, but she definitely got a raw deal from Trump's BS
    1
  247.  @carolyndennis4947  See Above!
    1
  248. Did Lauren Broebert receive a $10k fine today when she refused to allow capitol police look inside her purse? Doubtful.
    1
  249. He's up for re-election in 2026.
    1
  250. He already is unemployed. Don't you remember he resigned on Dec 20, 2020. He saw what was happening.
    1
  251. Are you suggesting that Barr should lie just because Democrats don't like him?
    1
  252. Trump's attorney (brunette, female, 30s) said Trump's security cameras captured everything on tape. So, that a good start!
    1
  253. Wow. A fox video with comments turned "on".
    1
  254. ​ @seanstinchfield-mp2xm  You think hamas would not have attacked on Oct 7?
    1
  255. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    1
  256. Israel is trying to get the US into a war with Iran. When is Bibi the Butcher going to be arrested?
    1
  257. While I am personally in favor of placing restrictions, like being over 21yo, on the sale of semi-auto, high-powered rifles and placing limitations on those with prior felony convictions involving a firearm from being able to purchase future firearms, I 100% agree with this SCOTUS decision. People purchasing legal firearms should NOT have to provide, show or prove any type of specific need in order to make the purchase -- Self-defense and protection of property being implied already meets the need, and if it didn't, the 2A would have included wording saying so. FULL STOP.
    1
  258. He will be at some point after the debate.
    1
  259.  @ricksmith2609  and tell us, Rick, WHAT are you doing about things?
    1
  260. They're Europeans. They don't have student debt
    1
  261. Well, Netanyahu has been trying in earnest to stop Israel from continuing as a democracy. Thank goodness the courts struck down at least some of his latest BS
    1
  262.  @joshlock4627  Regardless of thoughts on guilt or innocence and evidence aside, this assistant DA should never have been assigned this case. But, since he was and even though it doesn't happen often, I'm very surprised his boss, the DA, didn't do some employee shuffling and have co-counsel take the lead roll even midway through. Whenever there's obvious friction between an attorney, esp the prosecutor, and the judge in a case, it's best to have your co-counsel take a more prominent position. When there is attorney-judge friction it's usually with a member of the defense not the state.
    1
  263. Trump's own lawyers said they want the trials televised. Watergate trials were televised and that didn't cause "all trials to be televised."
    1
  264. He obviously has a time schedule to keep. He's actually WORKING and not golfing like some, or rather, one past president.
    1
  265. ​ @bruconicinfernon4noplatoon317  The only thing that might save us if he has another term is the scotus's own self-preservation!
    1
  266. Actually, there is a bit more context needed. Regardless of anyone's thoughts on guilt or innocence, the attorney the witness consulted with before turning in his video woeks in the same small firm as Rittenhouse's attorney. That actually does bring up the question of credibility. It's a valid legal question. It's been a long time since I've seen a prosecutor perform this poorly, but his line of questioning with this witness is something nearly any DA or ADA would have done.
    1
  267. ​ @psongman9536 I doubt the judge is going to allow that as a defense because he's not being accused of "illegal speech". As for Trump just taking the advice of his attorneys, who is going to tell the jurors this? Trump won't be taking the stand and his attorneys are the co-conspirators. They're not going to testify against themselves.
    1
  268. ​ @nicooosterlynck4030 Garland needs to be investigated for why it took a SP, Jack Smith, to finally get investigations into J6 and the fake electors scheme. I do think garland was adhering to Biden's wishes that Trump not be investigated.
    1
  269.  JAC 08  Yep. First it was Trump will beat Biden on Nov 4 NOPE Then, it was wait until Jan 6. NOPE Then, it was Jan 21st: NOPE Then, it was March something: NOPE Now, it's, "You just wait. You just wait!". Wait for what? That rascally wabbit! Keep crying. As a former Independent, I never realized how sweet "conservative's" and your RINO tears are!
    1
  270.  @matthammond889  Likely due to the fact that Biden isn't trying to ignore our constitution the way Trump did (and continues to do by gaslighting all of you into believing he's going to somehow have the election over-turned)
    1
  271.  @millardhuff1984  and based upon your comment, you're still learning English. Keep trying! I'm rooting for ya! You may not master it, but you'll improve the more that you practice!
    1
  272. Biden IS the President of the United States of America! No amount of crying or money sent to Trump or golden worship statues made is going to change that!
    1
  273. You're not "Trump fan" ??
    1
  274. Or maybe, we can roll back all the tax cuts the top 2% have gotten since 1980. Someone making millions pays approx 8% in federal taxes. Someone earning $50k pays 28%. Tell me how that's fair. The wealth gap we now have started during Reagan's first term and has continuously and substantially grown since. Trickle down economics does not work for anyone except the top 2%. Since Reagan, politicians and the top 2% have tried to convince the middle that it's the fault of the bottom 20%. It is not. They're gearing up to sunset social security and Medicare because to pay for the wealthy tax cuts. If you are under 60yo, you need to be very careful how you vote next year.
    1
  275.  @danger7694  You are incorrect. Every judge in any district in the US can sign an order for anyone's return if there is cause to do so. ANY judge.
    1
  276.  @danger7694  Then why did he promise me during his campaign that he would??
    1
  277.  @danger7694  Then why did he say at his campaign Rally's and during interviews many times that he would put them out for the public to see just like every president since Nixon? So, why did he tell me I could look at them, and now, you're telling me that I shouldn't look at them because they're private.
    1
  278.  @aa-tx7th  They'll eventually change the vote from a majority to a plurality vote. Then, we'll see some dramatic changes in how each votes.
    1
  279.  @marktwain2053  It's obvious that when asked the follow-up question, she couldn't answer because she hadn't practiced the "right" answer (s) beyond the initial question. Fox should be ashamed for exploiting this 2nd grader.
    1
  280. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this?
    1
  281. Every Dem candidate has released their returns for the last 60+ years. Now, we know where the NY Times got this info: Trump's niece, Mary Trump. You should read her book!; It's fascinating.
    1
  282. ​ @jucat60  and Jesus had brown skin.
    1
  283. As opposed to the GOP in Congress who have proven time and again that Trump is their puppet master.
    1
  284.  @quailshootr6389  The fact that Tulsi is literally the only democrat to run for POTUS that's also frequented Faux Noise, especially hannity's hour, is really all one needs to know about her. Of course, the fact that Q supported her tells us even more than we needed to know.
    1
  285. That shock should tell you it's time to reflect on YOUR choices
    1
  286. ​ @x00p3  Truth Sovial post in October
    1
  287.  @windmillrespector  An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    1
  288.  @charlie1832  The law ONLY provides Executive privilege to the current sitting POTUS. No one else can claim it. This law has remained the same since it came into being.
    1
  289.  Nancy Rocks  Yes, I am fully aware of how Executive Privilege works. However, the current, sitting president has full authority, actually the only authority, to waive the executive privilege for things that took place under a prior administration. It's the entire reason we heard the Nixon tapes. If Nixon had retained executive privilege over discussion held while he was in office, the public STILL would not know most if what took place. Additionally, Executive Privilege cannot be involved by the sitting president in order to cover up criminal actions/activities. If a former POTUS retains his/her Executive Privilege even after leaving office, our judicial system would have no way of ever prosecuting any crimes by perpetrators already out of WH. Governor's also hold Executive Privilege. If could have been invoked to cover up or to hide a crime, Blagovich could never have been prosecuted in IL.
    1
  290. Those Senators are refusing to talk to him or anyone about it like Jon said, THEY ARE COWARDS!!!
    1
  291. ​ @sandralawrence1043  Humbleness? You may need a Webster's
    1
  292. Spoken like the true white guy that you are.
    1
  293. Who is this "we" if which you speak?
    1
  294. Make sure you send him your money. He said he's fighting for YOU, and he shouldn't have to pay for YOU! Send a little extra for Melania's hair stylist. $108k paid for her hair for 6 months. The next 6 months is needed.
    1
  295.  @JohnSmith-fq7hj  Are you seriously asking?? Maybe, this will jog your memory: Trump refused to attend the WW1 memorial ceremony at the Parisian cemetery where WW1 American soldiers were buried because it was raining. Literally, because it was raining. ...
    1
  296.  @dwreal  Yeah, Trump hid his stolen documents from FBI agents and had his soon-to-be unlicensed attorneys cover for him.
    1
  297. ​​​ @fyramoss970  How is calling for a ceasefire considered "evil"? I'm seriously asking... WWJD
    1
  298. ​ @handsomethecat13731 Them, why does he keep asking for money? I get E-mails and texts everyday from him asking for donations. EVERY SINGLE DAY
    1
  299.  @hadley805  So, you're saying you'd rather hear "happy" lies than be told the ugly truth? You're the perfect Fox viewer.
    1
  300.  @tonyromano6220  0.03 is much different than 0.03%
    1
  301. At 0:45 To be fair and transparent, it's not that they didn't call Navarro's attorney, it's that they couldn't call his atty because he does not have one and has publically said he will not retain one even after the judge for his bond hearing strongly advised him to get one.
    1
  302.  @IEXpoZuR  Can they take a hair (fur?) Sample of the horse for a longer look back? It would be awful if done maliciously, but I assume the stalls have security cameras.
    1
  303. ​ @torablack  What Reagan did regarding the hostages was traitorous, imho.
    1
  304. She's not up for re-election until 2023
    1
  305.  @tomjones6422  Youleave Oprah out of this mess!
    1
  306. ​ @ReeCooks14579  Pence found a way around it. He used donations for his personal bills while running for governor.
    1
  307. No one, literally no one is covering up that he said that, including Fauci himself. He has stated many times that there were two reasons people weren't asked to wear masks initially. Since you seemed to have missed it, I'll repeat it for you here. First, there was ZERO data in at the beginning about whether or not average surgical and other type masks stopped or slowed the spread of covid. There was no data either way-for nor against mask wearing. However, there was data to show that some masks, specifically N95 masks, did inhibit the transmission of some viruses in hospital settings. Which brings us to the second point. Even though it made sense that masks would help stop the spread of a virus, even a new, unstudied, virus, the US relied 100% on china for it's current supply of N95 masks for hospital workers, and if any group of people NEEDED to wear masks, it was Frontline workers. There were tens if thousands of Frontline workers that quit while having access to masks --So, imagine how many would've quit if they didn't have access to masks. We saw what happened with toilet paper --Many Americans bought enough TP to last their household for over a year! Now, imagine if the CDC or Fauci had said, "We don't have the data to show that mask-wearing if the general population does or does't help, but it wouldn't hurt to wear one until we do have that data in.". Well, you KNOW how the public would have reacted, and masks wouldn't be available for our, OUR, fronting healthcare workers. Everything I've said us also in line with what the WHO was saying at that time. AS SOON AS the WHO had compiled just some data showing masks did help stop an infected person from spreading the virus molecules through talking, sneezing and coughing, they passed the data (even though it was still limited) along to our CDC, as well as, other countries' CDC equivalents. Hospitals, clinics, nursing homes and the like STILL had trouble issuing masks to employees that NEEDED them - it would have helped if the Trump administration had stocked more in our federal reserves. So, now you know WHY the public was not initially told to go out and buy masks to wear-- although, I suspect that you already knew everything I've stated. You should go back to ALL of the Fox hosts' segments that talked about masks, ESPECIALLY Tucker's. There you'll see that Fox's hosts have all flip-flopped on the topic of mask wearing nearly a HUNDRED times EACH. I will simply never understand why it was so damned hard for some people (and 70-80% of fox viewers) to simply put on a mask. I'd think that just the fact that being able to thwart facial recognition cameras alone would have been enough for Faux Noise's viewers to take cover. I've travelled the world, extensively, for the past 34yrs, and those cameras are EVERYWHERE. Don't kid yourself that the USA doesn't have them because we do. They may not be as plentiful as they are in, say, London, UK, but we definitely have them. But, I digress...
    1
  308. "Cleanliness" What a strange word to use.
    1
  309.  @mlauren629  She graduated with honors with a degree in political science and worked in a restaurant to help pay for it, and all you can do is be a racist prick with a line about her serving tacos? Where did you get magna cum laude recognition?
    1
  310.  @MegaCmsh  What does the Epstein story have to do with this? You do realize how large the DOJ is, right? They are capable of investigating more than a handful of cases at a time. There are dozens and dozens of federal indictments daily.
    1
  311. I'd be happy if they charged Congress members health insurance. They have the SWEETEST healthcare plan imaginable and 100% employer-funded. Then there's the lifetime retirement after 6 years of service in most instances!
    1
  312. BUT, she hasn't lied to you, yet. Kaleigh McInany did so almost daily.
    1
  313. An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    1
  314. That is NOT what happened. You saying that means you don't know.
    1
  315. The same people complaining the loudest about the lockdowns are now the same people complaining about wearing a mask. So, it's your choice: Don't wear a mask and we'll be back in lockdown OR wear a mask and stay open! You cannot have it both ways with a highly contagious respiratory virus. What part of the science do you not understand?
    1
  316. Poor Tucker. Such a snowflake.
    1
  317. His attorney signed that she received the warrant and the return items list before they left. So, he had it the same day.
    1
  318. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any??
    1
  319.  @AskMississippiAskMississippi  I see you're getting lots of hate, but NO ONE is responding to the $2 Billion, with a "B", deal Kushner somehow managed to get soon after Biden's inauguration. If we didn't know any better, one would think he was negotiating this deal while he was still a WH employee.
    1
  320. ​ @half-breed  Well, his base's donations are what's being used to pay his attorneys (and Melania's hair stylist). Forty million this year and he's only had 2 court appearances just to plead not guilty? Someone is overpaying for legal services. Well, not someone. All of those who've sent Trump money.
    1
  321. ​ @syav4467  To support her husband??
    1
  322. ​ @5thribroarn304  If Trump has evidence of his innocence, he has nothing to worry about. We will all be able to watch the Georgia trial.
    1
  323. ​ @r32guy10  California also has the strictest gun safety laws AND the lowest number of gun fatalities per capita.
    1
  324. ​​ @luislaplume8261  Actually, liberals want those earning over $400k annually to pay the same percentage in income tax as those making $50k. Why should someone making millions and millions a year only pay between 3-8% in tax, but someone making 50k pays 28%? Why do we have 11.5% of our paychecks taken out for FICA, but anyone earning over $147k pays nothing? If EVERYONE has to pay the same 11.5% into FICA, everyone who has retired and getting social security would get an additional $400/month. Why is our system set up so that the more you make, the less in tax you pay?What's wrong with that?
    1
  325. OF COURSE HE'S GOING TO PARDON HIM!
    1
  326.  @USA-qm2bk  it's actually far more than 1%. It's basic math. Take the # who have died and divide that by the # who have it. Then move the decimel point to spaces to the right. You'll see it between 3.4%-4.8%.
    1
  327.  @denniskoppo4259  Wow.
    1
  328. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    1
  329. Silence Trump? Does that mean he's going to testify in his own defense?
    1
  330. Who is "We"? Seriously asking
    1
  331. Right. They should've been investigated for allowing Russia to spread misinformation in 2016!
    1
  332. It's an INVESTIGATION not a Trial!! House impeachment is similar to an indictment: Witnesses testify to a grand jury without the defendent. If the grand jury feels there's enough to take it to trial, the defendent is indicted - House is deciding I'd there's enough evidence to charge/impeach Trump. THEN it goes to the Senate for a trial and where the defense can present itself.
    1
  333.  @Over_and_Under  You forgot to mention that Bill Clinton's Impeachment/investigation was behind closed doors also. The Democrats made a bit of stink (they didn't storm the Capitol) about it, but the procedures REQUIRE/D it to be closed-door at this stage of the game.
    1
  334. I hadn't noticed they'd stopped and restarted.
    1
  335. Yeah, Rudy was trying to hide his and his client's actions --and now, rudy is trying to say there's client-attorney privilege over the information, where no privilege actually exists.
    1
  336. Why does the GOP call for unity and for us to move on only when it suits them?
    1
  337. For Bair.
    1
  338.  @angelbeautpre  HaHa.
    1
  339. ​ @Alien_isolationist  Independents can vote in either primary (only one) in NH.
    1
  340. That's Mitch McConnell.
    1
  341.  @Burn_Slow  I don't know what a "3rd wave feminist" is. Please define.
    1
  342.  @Democracy-tj5dl  Well, speaking out against Trump, who is now his opponent, after trying to help him get re-elected in 2020, even prepping him for debates, is not enough for me to sing Christie's praises.
    1
  343.  @JRFOREVERHIS-yo3sk  Do you order that stuff you're taking over the internet or do you buy it locally? A one day old account is something I haven't seen!
    1
  344. That's the antibodies tests and it's 50%.
    1
  345. ​ @domusdebellum3042  We had a choice. Some did not.
    1
  346. It's no wonder Putin and Russia's state news network (RT) show Tucker's segments to Russian citizens.
    1
  347. These politicians don't live in Hollywood.
    1
  348.  @jeremyrockhold4869  It's not a leap to go to you being racist when the movement you're talking about literally has "Black" in the name AND is about stopping Black men from being shot & killed unnecessarily (and often illegally) by the police.
    1
  349.  @jojodixon1617  I have one point on your infringement discussion that I think is important to notate. When the founders provided people with the right to bear arms and that it could not be infringed upon or removed/revoked, they did NOT actually grant this right to everyone. While I personally believe with the basis of the 2A and the right to self-defense and preservation of property, when actually interpreting what might have been in the founding fathers' minds at the time is far more complex.
    1
  350.  @honestnewsnet  Yes, the US Constitution, including the Bill of Rights and Amendments, has been designed to be amended, or updated, if you will. Haven't the procedures to do just that been ratified and given inclusion into the document itself?
    1
  351.  @motorizedbicyclenation53cu90  Your statements do not recognize that the US government has infringed upon the 2A right already -- practically countless times. To be clear, I am not disagreeing with your feelings about the 2A, but in order to have a discussed debate, I believe it's important to include information that is relevant.
    1
  352. Nothing in our constitution stirs up the intensity of our emotions like the 2A. I think it is important that not only legislative and judicial officials continue to have discussions on it, it's important for citizens to also have similar discussions. Because it elicits emotions, it is more important than ever for each of us to remain respectful during discussions. I know I am guilty of not always adhering to this, but I do try to remain respectful. If you've ever had to learn how to debate in school, you are likely aware of how difficult it is to be assigned to present the "For/Against" side that is the opposite of your actual opinion on the subject. However, you likely realized the advantages and the importance of objectivity when looking at the other side's arguments.
    1
  353.  @honestnewsnet  I just want to acknowledge that you have remained respectful in your replies, and that is definitely needed in any discussion of the merits of the 2A.
    1
  354.  @davidscott9572  Actually, the Bill of Rights are not, as you stated, actually "set in stone". It's probably the one right that has been "tweaked" more than any other and it's the one amended right that has been taken away from both individuals and every citizen than any other right. As a quick example, the founders could not have likely envisioned air travel, specifically commercial aircraft and airlines, and if the 2A was "set in stone" and not amendable, the government couldn't enforce the restrictions on taking firearms on commercial flights. I support the basis of the 2A, but I also support the importance of including relevant information when discussing it.
    1
  355.  @peterli7120  Actually, "moving to another country" is not a right we possess.
    1
  356.  @murasakiiro447  I'm not sure which dictionary, legal or otherwise, you used for your definition of the term "amended", but it is not the full definition. Amended does not only mean "small changes".
    1
  357.  @deplorable_bitter_clinger7482  The investigation was not televised! Everything that led up to the impeachment hearing was televised, including Clinton's testimony. The Senate hearings were also televised, but the House's was not. We will have to agree to disagree on that one. On a similar note, when Democrats publically criticized the closed-door investigation hearings into Benghazi, Trey Gowdy, the Republican Congressman leading the investigation, responded by saying, "The private ones always produce better results.". I am definitely no fan of any Clinton, and the only one I might possibly be able to tolerate being in the same room with is Chelsea's new baby. Do not let the term impeachment "hearing" mislead you. President Trump has NOT been charged with a crime, so the rules of a criminal trial do not apply. Even for criminal trials, investigators must first investigate the crime in private prior to charging the suspect. Do you think it would be beneficial to allow suspects to be present the entire time that detectives are evaluating evidence and questioning possible witnesses to their crimes? I'm guessing not since you seem to be an intelligent individual. As for the current investigation, IF the House committees conducting it decide there is enough evidence of wrongdoing, the evidence used to determine this will be PUBLICALLY presented to ALL Representatives of the House prior to having a vote to determine if impeachment is warranted. It is similar to evidence presented to a Grand Jury, who collectively decide if a district attorney has even a smidgeon of evidence that would warrant an actual trial. During presentations to Grand Juries, defendents are not involved in any way whatsoever. All the GJ decides is whether or not it's at all possible, even if it's only remotely possible, that a crime may have happened. If so, the GJ votes in favor of charging the defendent, so that there can be an actual trial where all the evidence from both sides can be presented. It's very much the same as if the full House votes in favor of impeachment, the issue rolls over to the Senate for a hearing that is similar to a trial. The Senate hearings will be conducted publically. This is when Trump and his legal team will have the opportunity to provide a full defense of the impeachment, including the ability to publically question Trump and all of the witnesses who appeared in front of the House committee members. Trump's team would have the opportunity to provide & question any additional witnesses and to present any additional evidence in opposition of removing the President from office due to the impeachment (BTW, no Senate has ever voted to remove a president from office). The House holding a closed door INVESTIGATION hearing is the standard process that BOTH sides have adhered to many decades, centuries actually. Even if the House and the Senate were given the opportunity to vote today on whether or not INVESTIGATION hearings should always be held publically, it would not pass and would likely be unanimous in that decision b/c everyone acknowledges the value of having non-public investigation hearings just like Republicans chose to do for the Benghazi investigation. If Trump has done nothing wrong, then the evidence will not be there.
    1
  358. ​ @lindamcdaniel2419  Why didn't Trump's attorneys motion cannon to dismiss the case instead of requesting an indefinite trial date? If there's no evidence of a crime, defense attorneys usually point this out at their first appearance with the trial judge.
    1
  359. ​ @repentjesusiscomingsoon1529  He's 77. At least that's what he stated in court yesterday.
    1
  360. Vivek is polling at 4%. Not being on the Colorado ballot was inevitable, anyway. This isn't some magnificent, ethical action.
    1
  361. No one has taken Trump's Freedom of Speech!
    1
  362. Well, that seems to be nothing for the former, this far.
    1
  363.  @Samocracy  Tucker works for Faux Noise, afterall.
    1
  364. Wow! A Faux Noise video with the comments turned to "on". Also, Hannity pointing any finger at someone else for perpetuating conspiracy theories is insane.
    1
  365.  Richard Hammonds  An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    1
  366. He's saying he'll pick DeSantis as a VP so that DeSantis doesn't announce his own run BECAUSE trump knows DeSantis is likely the only rep candidate that could beat him and win the nomination.
    1
  367.  @acornsucks2111  That budget info was ALREADY in the bill VERBATIM when they passed it on June 16. The reason they voted it down this week is because McConnell was pissed Manchin agreed to the BBB reconsolidation and McConnell got the GOP to vote for the semiconductor chipsafe in the US resolution. The chip bill was what McConnell was holding over the Democrats head to not pass the BBB recon. 4 hours after the chip bill passed, Democrats announced Manchin was onboard for the BBB. That pissed McConnell off and he vowed to stop the next bill from passing. The next bill was the veterans bill. You should get your sh*t straight before you try and blow smoke up our veterans' asses
    1
  368.  @magalymendoza9653  Not for herself. She wants the taxpayers to be reimbursed for paying Trump's share of taxes he neglected to pay
    1
  369. Where can I find out more about forced abortions in the back of dirty police lorries?
    1
  370. Well, hurry up and get Biden out because us Democrats would love to have an open Dem Primary and a different candidate on the ballot in 2024!
    1
  371.  @bsloveswaves  no, they aren't. A new Model 3 is only 43,000 for the car new.
    1
  372. Most companies still do a background check. It's your issue if the candidates you like have issues pop-up in their background check and the other applicants point it out. Maybe, you need to reevaluate your choices.
    1
  373. Such a shame.
    1
  374. GOOD. Period
    1
  375. I dont know why the GOP is in such a hurry to get rid of biden through impeachment. Biden being on tbe ballot is tbe only thing giving Trump a possible chance at winning the general.
    1
  376.  @Soc1alBK  Oh, Honey, I am the furthest thing from a snowflake. I have the biggest duck's back I know.
    1
  377.  @Soc1alBK  I make a reference about trump and you ask me if the truth hurts my feelings. Make no mistake about it, no one, literally no one, associates Trump with the truth. Instead of mine, you should concern yourself more with Trump's feelings. He's so far in denial about his own popularity that I think he actually believes he won the election. It is so very sad.
    1
  378.  @dontfeedthebots7133  Maybe you should brush up on your 1A b/c clearly you're misinformed. The amendment protects an individual's right to not be sanctioned by the government or a gov't entity for expressing their views. There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution, including its Amendments, prohibiting a private enterprise, like Twitter, from doing what it has done. Now, if Twitter was run by the federal government and trump was banned, that would be considered an infringement of his 1A Rights. Trump isn't the first person banned from Twitter or Facebook, and he definitely will not be the last.
    1
  379.  @rfbedell347  You remember your statement when the verdict comes in
    1
  380. Perhaps, if Trump had not increased the deficit by trillions, more could be put in the package
    1
  381. It doesn't take much.
    1
  382.  @darinquarts6890  t ALL of the loans were paid off by Trump. Many of them were defaulted on in his 6 bankruptcies. He was given much more favorable terms than if he'd been even somewhat truthful. When banks lend money to someone for lowered rates, guess who makes up the difference? The thousands and thousands of little guys like you and me do.
    1
  383. It was when he took ACTIONS that were illegal that are the problem. The indictment literally says Trump had every right to say the election was stolen regardless of whether he believed it was or wasn't. No judge is going to allow that as a defense because he's not being charged for what he said. It's what he did, like the fake electors scheme.
    1
  384. Give us 2 examples, or even one example, of a third world country that has placed physical barriers to keep immigrants out.
    1
  385. That's total BS and it tells me you have no idea what this is about
    1
  386. Keep the tears coming.
    1
  387.  @victoriafliman5094  Because calling for a cease-fire is exactly what Jesus would do. Isn't it?
    1
  388.  @mkat4271  How so? Would Jesus call for a cease-fire? If not, why not?
    1
  389.  @eddiehrossidelima9675  Fetterman a no-name, who just happened to be PA's Lt. Governor. The only thing Oz has ever held publically is a handful of crudité.
    1
  390.  @Tom-ym7bm  I guess it's a good thing we keep religion out of government.
    1
  391.  @WildwoodClaire1  Now, that's a perfect comment. Thank you.
    1
  392. Yep. Now, if Tucker was present, it'd be full circle.
    1
  393. You're an idiot. This is serious. Now you have this governor telling us older people should be willing to sacrifice their lives in order to have a thriving economy.
    1
  394. Why not video? The public deserves the opportunity to see this themselves instead of relying on TV news to tell us. Let us watch for ourselves!!
    1
  395. ​ @johndobb8239  Have you spent 15 mins reading the actual indictment? If not, you have no foundation for saying someone else is being willfully ignorant.
    1
  396. An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    1
  397. ​ @miltonmoore8369  Not everyone reads the comments. Some of us have them read to us.
    1
  398.  @royc2390  I'm sure Stephen Miller wants that assignment.
    1
  399.  @royc2390  According to Project 2025, Miller is being eyed for AG.
    1
  400. "Disproportionately placed upon the shoulders of the last administration.". Well, on who's watch did this happen? Let's not forget, Trump did throw out rolls if paper towels, afterall.
    1
  401. ​ @B777-h6q  That was in Iowa
    1
  402. ​ @TECO1234  Iowa has a CLOSED Primary
    1
  403. Yes, I needed a laugh today.
    1
  404.  @patriotamerican3069  You're kidding, right?
    1
  405. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    1
  406. ​ @Nicole-b6d  Woke is fairness and equality for everyone. According to the Bible, Jesus advocated for the same.
    1
  407.  @raymondblake5765  I think the answer for Faux Noise only viewers is, "Yes. Yes, we do only want to hear people who agree with and think the same way as me and the rest of the flock." Snowflakes cannot handle hearing anyone disagree with one iota of anything Trump has said.
    1
  408. McKennany sounds a little jealous.
    1
  409. Trump has forever changed the definition of what iteans to be a patriot.
    1
  410. Stelter isn't wrong l-- He and Hannity are just opinion-ators. No one can deny that.
    1
  411.  @frankieraman2372  You can dislike her politics, but why do you have to refer to women like that? I'm genuinely curious.
    1
  412. I would say your statement is as big of a lie as I've ever heard... It's close, but I've heard Trump speak
    1
  413. ​ @Alien_isolationist  Because Trump has ramped up his bullying of her. So, clearly he thinks she's a threat.
    1
  414. Trump always tries to sound more intelligent and more knowledgeable than he is. That's why he couldn't help himself when talking to Woodward.
    1
  415. He's saying he'll pick DeSantis as a VP so that DeSantis doesn't announce his own run BECAUSE trump knows DeSantis is likely the only rep candidate that could beat him and win the nomination.
    1
  416. ​ @ninjagamer1359  unlike Trump, she's not afraid to do interviews on the "other side". Trump won't do any interviews with MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC or even CNN. He cancelled his 60 Minutes interview without explanation. He played and swayed to 40 minutes of music at a recent town hall so no one could ask him questions.... He's gone senile and if he's elected Vance will 25th Amendment Trump and Project 2025 will be full steam ahead. Can you not see the writing on the wall? It's plain as day.
    1
  417. ... as thought by Tucker before and after every episode.
    1
  418.  @arthurgibbons7401  Wow, you actually asked CNN that series of questions AND they responded to you? Sounds like you're misinterpreting one of your dream sequences. I'm fairly certain there are professionals available to assist you in deciphering dreams from reality. I've put you in my prayer list.
    1
  419. Reply::it was worth a shot! Haha
    1
  420.  @arthurgibbons7401  Who is this "mysterious" Democrat you had this conversation with? People living in your head actually don't count
    1
  421.  @TSWARD-xb9rk  I see I should add you to my church's prayer list, as well. God Bless you and your little heart. XO
    1
  422.  @TSWARD-xb9rk  May I ask why you out quotes around Prayer? Are you an atheist?
    1
  423.  @TSWARD-xb9rk  I thought that as a trump supporter, you if all people would appreciate a good "prayer".
    1
  424. Fox is just as responsible as Trump for the storming of the Capitol.. AND, it IS a fact that Trump lost the election.
    1
  425. I dont know why the GOP is in such a hurry to get rid of biden through impeachment. Biden being on tbe ballot is tbe only thing giving Trump a possible chance at winning the general.
    1
  426. She needs to learn when to back down and compromise. If she thinks it's okay for people in financial dire straights to wait another 8 months while Congress agrees, then she has already lost touch with her young constituents.
    1
  427. Well, not in this clip
    1
  428.  @brookedelaney1  People don't talk about suicide unless they've thought about it.
    1
  429. Democrats stand a much better chance in a Biden v Trump than a Biden v Haley. Why would Dems lose their chance to vote in the Democratic Primary with all of those statewide races on the line?
    1
  430. You're hilarious!!
    1
  431. Tucker Carlson is a disgrace
    1
  432. There are always going to be people that sell arms to ANYONE for the right price.
    1
  433. After months of watching various Fox commentors, Ingraham has to be the biggest idiot on the air currently.
    1
  434.  @tiredofit1968  Where does it state in the US Constitution about "God-given"? Seriously asking. EDIT: That has been rephrased in the original comment, and in the spirit of transparency, I've chosen to add this edit instead of deleting my original reply.
    1
  435.  @bl8388  I am completely lost. I feel as though I'm missing out on a good laugh but I need further explanation!! Lol I finally got it! Lol
    1
  436.  @raytschudy8643  I believe the prior comment was referencing the Constitution's Bill of Rights, and I am curious as to where that wording is used. I'm not sure what you mean by "basically".
    1
  437.  I'M ALL OUT OF BUBBLE GUM!  I still side with Carlin in that they are all privileges. The reason I feel this way is b/c every freedom/right stated in the Bill of Rights is not possessed by 100% of the population. Every so-called right either has limitations that apply to everyone or limitations that apply to specific individuals. I'm not saying I disagree with those limitations being in place, but they are limitations nonetheless. For example, Freedom of Speech in the 1A gives individuals protection from retaliation by the government regarding the individuals' written and spoken statements, but there are limitations, like the "Fire!" example so often used, as well as, defamation of another. The right for individuals to be armed based upon the 2A also has exclusions and limitations. An example of that is individuals cannot possess certain types of weapons, and there are physical places where an individual cannot exercise this right, ie firearms on a commercial aircraft, public schools, all churches (in some states), govt buildings, etc. Again, I am not against some, or even most, of these limitations, but these exclusions do exist and additional exclusions are consistently being added. In addition, it's possible for legislation to amend or even remove these rights at any point in the future, meaning they will always technically be privileges we currently have.
    1
  438.  @schlemmermaul5224  Of course "our rights" can be altered, and they actually have been altered since the Bill of Rights was signed. There are provisions for doing just that in the constitution.
    1
  439.  @kenichitamagusuku3194  You are DEFINITELY correct in your statement that law enforcement officers enforce laws even though most do not have much knowledge regarding the laws they are enforcing. It's crazy that an officer can be fully trained in under 6 months, with little of that time going towards education on laws, but it takes 2 years of training to become a cosmetologist. Law agencies wouldn't need to rely on qualified immunity so much if they were better trained. There are countless videos on this platform of officers "enforcing" laws that don't actually exist AND it's obvious they don't. I am not trying to bash LEOs individually or as a whole. I am, however, pointing out a severe lack of training on the education of the laws they are assigned to enforce. It's amazing to think about how many citizens have had their rights blatantly trampled upon that weren't caught on tape. It's a big reason why many jurors no longer accept or believe an officer testifying in a criminal case -- people now need tangible evidence like DNA and video tape.
    1
  440.  @rickb.4168  I fully understand your viewpoint regarding your stance on the existence of god. I think it's accurate, at least in this context, to interchange it with "given by nature" or "instinctually inspired" as in the preservation of one's self in the context of self-defense is inherently provided by nature (or inherently natural).
    1
  441.  @vinceruland9236  First, I am in full agreement with your definition of "god-given". However, you may believe that the government cannot take or remove any parts of our previously given rights away, but this has happened since the Bill of Rights was enacted. Our government has continuously amended every stated right in the BoR. As two quick examples, there are restrictions on the types of arms we can possess and restrictions on where/places we can actively possess those "allowed" arms (commercial aircraft, banks, etc). There is not a single right that cannot be rescinded by legislation -- the process for doing so was ratified in the Constitution itself.
    1
  442.  @rickb.4168  FYI, I was educated in both the UK and the US, and I was asking for clarification because I did not receive the traditional childhood education on the US Constitution and US Civics that most Americans had. A good portion of my knowledge of the US Constitution and federal government was attained outside of a traditional classroom. I asked the question because I truly wanted to be informed. It was not an attempt at being snarky.
    1
  443.  @raytschudy8643  I understand what you are saying regarding the Declaration's inalienable rights and how you connect firearms to the right to Life. But, there is also the argument that when the Declaration was enacted and "all men are created equal" and the right to the "pursuit of happiness" were actually not in effect at the time the Declaration was signed. I'm not trying to split hairs, but I am a proponent of transparency and I try to view information and statements from various angles-- even when I personally disagree with them.
    1
  444.  I'M ALL OUT OF BUBBLE GUM!  I honestly cannot think of a single stated right that has not been taken away legally from an individual or a group of individuals. You said "no one can stop you from having them." But, there are countless cases of people being stopped from having them. My point is that our government, through our elected officials and legislators, can and have taken away those rights. It happens literally every day. It's why no one is walking around with a bazooka, at least not legally.
    1
  445.  @vinceruland9236  I totally understood what you meant, and I actually feel the same way about it as you. I just feel it's important to look at most, if not all, issues from multiple angles. It's very difficult to remove our emotions in any discussion about a law or set of laws.
    1
  446.  @gamebredduramax71  Yes, over the last century, there have been numerous discussions/debates in legal arenas over what or how the founders defined the word "arms" both at the time the 2A was written and how people believe those founders would interpret it today. I, personally, think that it's important that not just legislative and judicial officials continue to have these discussions, I think it's important for every day citizens to also talk and discuss them respectfully. The 2A can be and often is a very emotional subject, and I am guilty of letting my emotions temporarily override my own desire to remain respectful when discussing it. I'm sure I will do it in the future, and hopefully, the more it's discussed the less likely I am to do it.
    1
  447.  I'M ALL OUT OF BUBBLE GUM!  I probably should have stated that I may not personally be in agreement with many of my statements. In fact, from what you've stated in your comments, you and I likely feel the same way on much of it. However, when I try to discuss our laws, particularly our rights, I try to remove my personal beliefs from the equation and focus on interpreting the legal merits and definitions regarding our rights. If you ever had a debate class in school, it's not easy to be assigned the "For/Against" side that doesn't jive with your personal viewpoint, but it's necessary to give the subject/topic a fair shake. Although it's not actually documented as an inherent or given right, we will always retain and never lose the individual right to our personal beliefs and opinions. While the government can stop us from expressing our beliefs, they will never have the power stop us from forming our individual beliefs, opinions and reasonings. The fact that our Creator/Nature provided us with the ability to reason and to form a personal belief system is really is what separates us from other mammals/animals. That DEFINITELY doesn't mean the gov't, or portions of it, won't continue attempting to influence and shape our individual beliefs.
    1
  448.  I'M ALL OUT OF BUBBLE GUM!  Thank you. Same here :)
    1
  449. Awww, are you speaking from your wealthy life?? Since corona, have you ever been concerned, REAL CONCERN, about how you're going to feed you and your children??
    1
  450. Well, we now KNOW that it was DJT's niece, Mary Trump, that provided the returns to the NY Times. You should read her book. It's fascinating.
    1
  451.  @jmsomps  This was not the DNC trying to get Trump as you state. We now know it was his own niece who supplied them. See how quick you are to blame Democrats?
    1
  452. Mary Trump states in her book that she gave the IRS transcripts to NYT. She had access to them from a lawsuit involving an inheritance. No IRS leaker and no one colluded with Democrats.
    1
  453. @bdb global Mary Trump had access to them fr an inheritance conflict and she gave them to NYT.
    1
  454. If Cruz think Biden has played politics with Covid, he should look at how Trump politicized the virus.
    1
  455.  @Brx01  Info Alert: When you post public comments in YT's public comment section, your comments are available and directed towards whomever reads them. You sound like a 12 yr old "mean girl" --"Hmpf! I wasn't talking to you!" Please. Grow Up!
    1
  456. ​ @seanblankenship5404  Nah, you can at least understand what Sesame is saying.
    1
  457. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    1
  458.  @jonathonbridges9625  Nope and this video left it for interpretation. BTW, I am pro 2nd A
    1
  459. I agree. For the very first time in our history, the SCOTUS revoked one of our rights. That's definitely moving away from Freedom. The longest serving justice just gave us a heads-up and told us that every one of our due process rights in our Constitution should be reviewed for revocation, as well. This is how it starts -- losing one right at a time.
    1
  460. Perfect. Set the stage for why he loses the popular vote for a THIRD time
    1
  461. Why isn't Fox covering the email that just came out showing the aid money to Ukraine was halted 90 minutes after he hung up with Zelensky? Then, the money was released the day after the whistleblower report.. sure, he's definitely not guilty.
    1
  462. ​ @marclucido5721  First, Trump's attorneys would need to have the case dismissed with prejudice. Good luck with that.
    1
  463. Email every official beginning with those at your city and county level.
    1
  464. @James Brauer We must each do our own fact-checking. Anyone who relies on a "news" network to do the fact-checking, might as well just take everything that Hannity and Tucker say as gospel. Never use a news source to fact-check another news source.
    1
  465. And Trump has been "running" the country fueled by his Obama-Envy for over 3 years.
    1
  466. No worries, Marjorie Traitor Greene's Jewish space lasers will probably stop them.
    1
  467. The comments sound about right: "I don't like what she's saying. So, Fox should fire her.". You guys live in a daydream just like Trump. He also throws tantrums when anyone in his cabinet reports facts to him that he doesn't like as if the messenger has anything to do with the actuality of a situation.
    1
  468. Banned from what? Obviously not from YT.
    1
  469.  @dylanparker130  Apparently, you are not aware of the most recent news regarding Mueller's report and internal DOJ memos that the judge ordered to be released. The judge stated that Barr was not candid in his summary of the 400+ page report!
    1
  470. If it walks like a duck...
    1
  471. Then, you go out and if you have to go into the hospital, you demand that they not give you a ventilator. Let's see you sacrifice yourself FIRST. Then, you can preach to rest of us
    1
  472. The 37,000 deaths from those last year didn't all happen in 9 weeks, but they did happened without social distancing. That alone should tell you your statement is wrong.
    1
  473.  @teekay5213  Just because she named Mitch but not Trump does not mean she/he doesn't also think Trump is responsible. Trump is responsible for most of it and Mitch aided him in his endeavor
    1
  474. Your comment was done in jest, right? That 60 second clip was no worse than the other 59 minutes of that phone call. Trump is as corrupt as they come. HOW you can support that wanna-be dictator is mind blowing.
    1
  475. In what state? Most states implemented new laws making it impossible to "harvest" ballots. You have to have ID to get a mail in ballot and you have to have ID to vote In-Person. You just prefer to spread misinformation.
    1
  476. Why wouldn't people take it seriously and literally-- the White House has stated that his tweets are OFFICIAL WH STATEMENTS!
    1
  477. An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    1
  478. Because the criminal is Trump-- Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  479. ​ @JO-om9wd  If you don't understand the comment, it's doubtful you'll do better with a follow-up.
    1
  480. You didn't go, did you...
    1
  481.  @manlysoutherner3696  What's the matter Manly? You have something against free speech all of a sudden?
    1
  482. Wait. I just watched a video of MAGAs being interviewed. They said Biden is dead and James Woods is actually playing Biden. Some said Trump was still in charge under some covert military op. What's going on with you maga folks?
    1
  483.  @garypatton9720  I didn't know she came on a fiancé visa. I thought she came on a tourist visa.
    1
  484. Comey announcing he was looking into Clinton's e-mails 6 weeks before the 2020 election definitely affected the election. He has said so many times in interviews. He regrets it.
    1
  485. Ahh, but Trump ran as a RINO.
    1
  486. This segment should have actually provided more context here. The reason the prosecutor asked who the witness's attorney was is because his attorney is from the same firm as Rittenhouse's, and that does go to credibility.
    1
  487. Sounds very similar to Tucker Carlson's background.
    1
  488. It sure seems like maga is hoping for a civil war How patriotic of them.
    1
  489. Bullshite. Other developers don't inflate their property values and square footage by 1000+%
    1
  490.  @johntaylor-lo8qx  Name one swamp creature that was exposed by Trump? Just one. ALL of the politicians that were caught were Trump allies. HOW you can't see that Trump IS a swamp into himself us beyond all reasoning
    1
  491. Really? So was Marjorie Traitor Greene's "Promoting Anglo-Saxon Values" manual
    1
  492. Vivek is polling at less than 5%. Taking his name off of the ballot in Colorado was going to happen at some point, but now he can suck up to Trump and hope for an official assignment if Trump wins.
    1
  493. Based upon their Fox photos, Hannity and Tucker are morphing into the same person.
    1
  494. Hannity's 100million people in the US aren't working. He conveniently forgot 86% of them are over the age of 65 and under the age of 18 and wouldn't be working regardless of who's in charge.
    1
  495.  Mark Moses  Not sure where you heard that, but that's not actually true
    1
  496. ​ @MarkAnthony-x3o  Hardly
    1
  497.  @datmeme8967  You do realize that is EXACTLY why fox has her on, right? So, people can immediately and automatically dismiss, even block, everything she says because of that past, alleged incident of giving Clinton an advanced copy of questions ; There by, leaving you virtually zero opportunity to even hear if there might be any validity to a view different from what the entire Fox on-air staff is telling you. It's called manipulation, and many of you are falling right for it.
    1
  498.  @datmeme8967  I knew if I added the word "alleged" someone would only be able to focus on that word instead of the actual point of my comment -- which is the exact point that you just proved by your response. Wow.
    1
  499. Televise the trials and court appearances!
    1
  500. Oh, you're wrong. Trump being on the ballot is the best chance Biden has of winning. If there's a different Republican on the ballot, Biden has a much lower chance.
    1
  501. ​ @jacquelinel1618  He doesn't have the right to keep govt documents. If he would have returned them, this wouldn't be happening. Why do you think Trump worked so hard to keep the documents hidden? You must have a theory. If there was a chance that Trump was entitled to them, then, he could have filed a motion stating this. He didn't. Trump and his attorneys are telling you one thing on TV, but are doing and saying something completely different in court.
    1
  502. ​ @passerau They made an exception for Watergate. 8 suspect they'll make an exception for Trump, too.
    1
  503. ​ @grandmastershek NY state doesn't allow cameras in criminal trials. HOWEVER, the US govt made an exception for the Watergate trials. I anticipate they'll do the same for Trump's.
    1
  504. ​ @COO113  I want Trump to run. Trump being on the ballot gives Biden the best chance of winning!
    1
  505. ​ RickFlanagan  5 years? Where on earth did you find that "law"?
    1
  506. Trump sent national guard troops to the border but they didn't do anything either. Was that a dereliction of duty, too? Congress has to act. The president doesn't make immigration policy.
    1
  507. We have needed immigration reform for 20 years! It didn't work with Trump and it's not working with Biden. Under current policies, asylum applications have to be ruled upon and there has been a rolling 3 year backlog for over a decade. Only 30% of those applicants receive asylum after 3 years. Meanwhile, the US has to pay to house, feed, clothe and provide medical care to them.
    1
  508. What does Trump mean by, "I THINK it's a hoax. I really think it was a hoax ". THAT right there tells us he was told about it, but chose to ignore even those that were saying it was credible information. So, basically, if Trump doesn't want to have to do anything, ie his actual job, he just needs to find one guy in the room who says, "I'm not sure." Then, BAM! He has a reason for ignoring it.
    1
  509. Because they did NOT get in the boarding line and board within the time frame.
    1
  510.  @oneaboveall948  BUT they did NOT board on time.
    1
  511. ​ @promethiac2641  100%. I've been waiting for Republicans to introduce an immigration reform bill for over 3 decades. I think they'd rather immigration reform as a campaign promise and talking point to help them get re-elected because they sure as hell haven't attempted to do anything about it. They slashed the Border Patrol budget and reduced the number of agents on the southern border by 3,300.
    1
  512. Then, you understand what TS-SCI documents can be, right?
    1
  513. Sure... Because his Abraham Accords worked so well as did moving the embassy to Jerusalem.
    1
  514. I was AMAZED at the sheer volume of people ignoring the actual news in this segment. Binstead, these Snowflakes can't take it when someone has a different opinion than they have or isn't following the usual Faux Noise narrative. I can only believe that most of Faux's personalities don't actually believe what they're dishing out to the sheep.
    1
  515.  @FRAME5RS  Well, the way things are going, that won't equate to much in the near future.
    1
  516. What cover-up?
    1
  517.  @huh4324  Research what exactly?
    1
  518.  @caseyluksch5114  That's what Russia said. Russia blamed Urkraine for it. Is that a coincidence?
    1
  519.  @nickd5158  I'm sure the NRA needed that massive yacht w/ a full-time executive chef and six fully appointed staterooms. I'm sure regular old NRA members are enjoying it as we speak.
    1
  520. I find it unusual that CNN has gone back and publically corrected, even retracted, any story that wasn't corroborated. Imagine if Fox did this. There wouldn't be enough hours in a month to cover it all.
    1
  521. Ahh, too bad our laws prohibit a convicted felon from running.
    1
  522. But, most current conservatives DONT put God or country first. They worship one MAN.
    1
  523. Wrong. PROFESSIONAL APPRAISERS DID provide the trump organization with accurate, legal appraisals that Trump should have used. He purposely didn't. As for oversight --> It's here
    1
  524.  @helenshg4580  He stated it was from the 1640s. That is long before we became a nation. So, this rule of law that he is referring to must have been from the UK under the rule of a monarch at the time. When we left the UK, we left behind their protocols, procedures and legal system and was the reason our forefathers had great insight into establishing the rules of law in our Constitution. The rules governing Presidential impeachment hearings in the US actually state that the investigation process may only have members of the committee(s) and select individuals of their staff in attendance during the deposition phase. For the committees to actually allow all members of the House to attend would be a violation.
    1
  525. What? How's that?
    1
  526. As someone who's likely going to vote for Biden, I agree with you.
    1
  527. The cutoff was October 6
    1
  528. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative. I'm can only assume that you've quit 5be Kool-Aid OR you've suddenly changed your mind and decided Assange was actually lying. Of course, you did. .. same old Trump tactic
    1
  529. ​ @truepatriots3860  in what way?
    1
  530. Always taking the back door
    1
  531.  @claribethdavis9614  Trump is pushing the vax-- Is that why he specifically ordered that no press and no cameras be there when he had it? Why he specifically said no press release stating he and Melania had gotten the vaccine in January? Is that why he's not calling in to Fox while Tucker is saying you don't need the vaccine? You mean all of those times?
    1
  532.  @joncarbone  That's the same reason so many lifelong Republicans chose not to vote for him: b/c of whom he is.
    1
  533. It's standard procedure to NOT release affidavits UNTIL an investigation is concluded OR there is an indictment that is due in part to evidence seized by the warrant. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    1
  534. I'm sure if Obama wanted to warm Biden, he'd pick up the phone.
    1
  535. NO. The moderator did NOT allow her more time, but Pence continuously went over his time and by a good bit
    1
  536.  @treat-ct7wl  The questions likely sounded that they were geared towards Trump because he IS the current president and we want to know how Biden/Harris and Trump/Pence are going to handle things going forward. Debate questions when there is an incumbent running are always geared towards what is currently happening. What type of question would you suggest as a fair, nonpartisan question?
    1
  537. ​@@ADD8 I do not.
    1
  538. THATS your take-away? You saying that there is a leaker is also saying there was something to actually leak. Given that, the leak is your most important thing to address -- while COMPLETELY ignoring that Trump did nothing, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, to stop our soldiers from being murdered. WHY do you think he chose to do nada to stop it?? Or can you not think that far into it?
    1
  539.  @user-FBA-1  You're right. I'm sure they'll give him a modified home confinement.
    1
  540.  @nonameissafer.8457  It's difficult for native Chinese, Russian and Iranian speakers to become fully fluent in English while living in their home countriesj.
    1
  541. Agreed. Air the trial so we can see for ourselves!
    1
  542.  @bearlemley  What field of aviation? There are rarely "rares" in aviation. Perhaps, you tidy the aircraft between flights? A wing-walker, maybe?
    1
  543.  @davidspeller4344  Actual republicans are constantly laughing at the likes of you. Heck, even trump spent 5 DECADES as a Democrat before quickly switching parties in 2016 --anothercase 0f trumpcalling someone elseputforthesame rimes he's already committed.
    1
  544. Trump hasn't even had a hearing in front of Judge Chutkan, yet. The magistrate just did the arraignment. And how do you know what Trump's defense has requested when they haven't requested anything yet?
    1
  545. Firm direction? He has flip-flopped on practically everything he wrote in his book 5 years ago.
    1
  546. She didn't announce her intention to "bring down Donald Trump.". She said she would follow the investigation wherever it took her. She obviously did
    1
  547. ​ @jayherting74  the money hasn't even been released yet. Why do you suppose Iran is trying to bomb Israel?
    1
  548. ​ @wadekaplan9379  Well, perhaps, the GOP will actually provide said evidence at some future point. Until then, the House Republicans look like a circus tent full of bozos.
    1
  549. That's EXACTLY what Trump has some trolling Republicans in Congress.
    1
  550. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this?
    1
  551.  @rondesanctimonious2591  You should watch John Oliver's latest video on crime reporting.
    1
  552. Trump's response to the ban only proves that Facebook did the right thing!
    1
  553. Kaylie Milquetoast
    1
  554. They may have been there 3 hours before BUT they did not board within the time frame to board. The agent even said he called their names a couple of times and they still did not board or show up!
    1
  555.  @craigdishner407  Perhaps, if you could point out one CNN news video that has the comments turned off and post the link or even the exact title w/date, we wouldn't think you were lying ...
    1
  556.  @craigdishner407  You specifically said CNN not pbs, not Bloomberg
    1
  557.  @craigstanton8687  What does growing peanuts in my state of Georgia and cotton in Mississippi have to do with elections? How is that ostracizing the southern and middle states? What about RI & DE? The electoral college is no more based in today's reality than the 3/5 Compromise is. WHY do you think it's unfair for the winner of an election to be the candidate who receives the most votes?
    1
  558. Because no other POTUS has been THIS corrupt. There is NO bs-ing his way out of this one. They literally have the receipts.
    1
  559.  @stj971  Is it coincidental that he's had "25 attempts on his life" (news to me) and exactly 25 women accuse him of sexual assault? Maybe grabbed 'em too often.
    1
  560.  @TheIkaika777  :
    1
  561. The pandemic was definitely why he lost. He handled it so poorly that the US lost more residents to Covid than any other country.
    1
  562. It stopped being freedom of speech when ACTIONS were taken to make fale electors and it continued from there.
    1
  563. You think there's evidence to impeach Biden? Go for it!! You do realize that if you're voting for Trump, your best shot at winning is if Biden is the Democratic candidate, right? When 76% of people who voted for Biden in 2020 would prefer a different Democrat on the ballot, why on earth would you push to change that? Literally, Biden being on the ballot is Trump's best chance at possibly winning. Most Democrats would love to have an open Democratic primary. So, if there's evidence of Biden committing a crime, please bring the impeachment. It would be a blessing and raise the likelihood of a Democrat winning again in 2024.
    1
  564. ​ @doniwentworth9279  oh, right. Trump should be known as Mr. Truthful.
    1
  565. Given that 76% of Democrats want a different candidate than Biden, you'll be doing us a big favor!
    1
  566.  @mimsyborogove3906  You might as well give up trying to educate this lot. Those who comment on this channel are the 29-30% of diehards that actually believe God put Trump in office & are likely the same ones who believe(d) Obama was actually the Antichrist. You cannot open or clear the mind of someone who believes God hand-picked Trump to put the world back in order. Smh
    1
  567.  @mimsyborogove3906  It IS incredibly frustrating. I get through it by trying to have pity on them because they have already had the kool-aid. If you'll notice, their retorts are rarely factually based and almost always boil down to vulgar name calling. How can you possibly enlighten someone who's responses are based upon name calling? You can't. Encourage the young people you know to vote. The 18-24 yr old age group is the group that has historically voted the least BUT if they did vote, studies show they have the highest numbers and the most influence. I'm not a huge fan of AOC, but that's the age group in NY that actually turned out to vote & got her elected. Young people simply don't seem to realize the power in numbers that are literally at their fingertips.
    1
  568.  @mimsyborogove3906  I think it's a very touch & go to start impeachment hearings. While I personally believe there is enough evidence for the House to vote in favor to impeach Trump, I don't think the Senate will vote in favor to remove him. If that happens, Trump cannot face trial for those same crimes when he leaves office (double indemnity). Then he walks scott-free. As much as I want him out of office, but it won't get done through impeachment. Therefore, I'd rather the House do nothing and have him indicted the day after his term(s) ends. It's very frustrating to many of us and I, too, have a very hard time understanding how his supporters are able to ignore his & his cronies' actions. Worse yet, I don't know how they are able to acknowledge & then justify Trump's & many in the GOP's actions. It is beyond me how KY views McConnell and SC views Graham in a such a positive light that they're able to win re-election. It's as if we're living in two separate world's -- one based in reality and the other based in ?? The division in our country now runs so deep that no matter what Trump says or does, his side accepts it. What's worse to me is that they refuse to question anything he does. It's like a young child who doesn't question an abusive parent. Why? They don't know any better and can't reason past what they're told. I'm hoping that social media will help encourage young people to realize their vote does indeed matter. When I was young, like you, I didn't feel my vote mattered either and politics was a tangled mess that I didn't understand. Hopefully, our advanced technology & social media will change that -- and HOPEFULLY, even if Trump chooses to ignore that a foreign govt was able to interfere in our elections, the rest if the GOP won't! I cannot believe Trump supporters aren't throwing their arms up & raising hell over Russia infiltrating our system(s). Trump is taking no actions to secure our voting processes. Yet, if he loses in 2020, he will blame his loss on some type of "illegally gotten votes". I fear there will be widespread pockets of street violence if he loses, and I definitely don't think he'll leave the WH on his own accord if he loses in 2020. It's going to be a mess whether he's voted in or out in 2020.
    1
  569. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative. So, do you STILL love Julian Assange??
    1
  570. Younger voters need to start showing up to vote. They run older candidates because it's people over 55yo who actually vote.
    1
  571.  @pulehu.shortribs143  haha!
    1
  572. At least, we wouldn't have two different news channels reporting two different things happening in the courtroom!
    1
  573.  @atzog1131  Well, Putin did order Russian state TV to play clips of Tucker more often. So, I'd say it's serious, and it's a shame you can't even see it. Can you?...
    1
  574. Is the Second Amendment important to you? I can't believe more people aren't sounding the alarm! Our freedoms are being diluted little by little right in front of us*! For the *first time in our history, one of our rights has been revoked. That is literally moving away from Freedom! And those that are currently diluting our freedoms even gave us the heads-up telling all of us that every one of our due process rights afforded to us as stated in our United States Constitution also need to be reviewed for revocation. They literally just said we need to prepare ourselves to have ALL of our rights taken away. Say what!? They are telling us out loud that what we've always believed to be our rights, are little more than privileges and courtesies they've so generously extended to us, and they've now readied the field to take back those courtesies from us. They are obviously so confident that there's nothing we can do about it, they are purposely saying the quiet part outloud. This is exactly how it starts -- losing one right at a time. Is the Second Amendment important to you? What Constitutional Right and Freedom is the most important one to you? Is it knowing our government can't retaliate against you for criticizing it due to Freedom of Speech? Is it your right to defend and to protect you and your family Due to your right to bear arms from the 2nd Amendment? Is it the comfort in knowing you won't have to fight for your right to vote like your mom, grandmother and the women before you did? Perhaps, it's what you're doing now: Watching your favorite host, Tucker, provide you with news that wasn't scripted directly from the government due to Freedom of the Press? While the freedoms and rights in our Constitution affect each of us differently, it doesn't make one of them more important than another. If you're a man, it should still matter to you that women continue to have the right to vote. Just because you don't own a gun, it should still matter to you that everyone continues to have the right to bear arms. It is the entirety of all of our rights that truly gives us freedom. No single right should be viewed as being more important than another. If I enjoy the freedom of owning a gun, I still respect someone else's right to decide to not own a gun, and I should expect that same respect in return. I can own a gun and support the 2A without believing everyone else should own a gun. I'm not in an interracial marriage, but it doesn't mean that no one else should be. Either we support all of our established freedoms or we don't. None of us should be okay that we are having our ESTABLISHED rights taken from us. Now that it's started, you may wonder when is it going to stop. What we need to be concerned with IS it going to stop?
    1
  575. I don't understand why or how anyone could buy into the notion that the ENTIRE world, from China to Russia to Africa, are all in on it. It's unusual for two leaders of two countries to agree. What could possibly be so enticing that every major power in our world would be enjoined in something like this? We can't even get some countries to agree to not target women and children during wartime. Whatever you think these leaders would gain by planning Covid, wouldn't it have been much more efficient to release something with a much higher fatality and disabling rate?
    1
  576.  @yourmomma2995  If that's the smallest, what are some of the biggest, in your opinion?
    1
  577. I think Time left out the part where Russia did the same and worse in 2016.
    1
  578. Spot-on doppelganger
    1
  579.  @dothemathemathics7537  rDNA vaccines have been on the research front for over a decade
    1
  580. Is the Second Amendment important to you? I can't believe more people aren't sounding the alarm! Our freedoms are being diluted little by little right in front of us*! For the *first time in our history, one of our rights has been revoked. That is literally moving away from Freedom! And those that are currently diluting our freedoms even gave us the heads-up telling all of us that every one of our due process rights afforded to us as stated in our United States Constitution also need to be reviewed for revocation. They literally just said we need to prepare ourselves to have ALL of our rights taken away. Say what!? They are telling us out loud that what we've always believed to be our rights, are little more than privileges and courtesies they've so generously extended to us, and they've now readied the field to take back those courtesies from us. They are obviously so confident that there's nothing we can do about it, they are purposely saying the quiet part outloud. This is exactly how it starts -- losing one right at a time. Is the Second Amendment important to you? What Constitutional Right and Freedom is the most important one to you? Is it knowing our government can't retaliate against you for criticizing it due to Freedom of Speech? Is it your right to defend and to protect you and your family Due to your right to bear arms from the 2nd Amendment? Is it the comfort in knowing you won't have to fight for your right to vote like your mom, grandmother and the women before you did? Perhaps, it's what you're doing now: Watching your favorite host, Tucker, provide you with news that wasn't scripted directly from the government due to Freedom of the Press? While the freedoms and rights in our Constitution affect each of us differently, it doesn't make one of them more important than another. If you're a man, it should still matter to you that women continue to have the right to vote. Just because you don't own a gun, it should still matter to you that everyone continues to have the right to bear arms. It is the entirety of all of our rights that truly gives us freedom. No single right should be viewed as being more important than another. If I enjoy the freedom of owning a gun, I still respect someone else's right to decide to not own a gun, and I should expect that same respect in return. I can own a gun and support the 2A without believing everyone else should own a gun. I'm not in an interracial marriage, but it doesn't mean that no one else should be. Either we support all of our established freedoms or we don't. None of us should be okay that we are having our ESTABLISHED rights taken from us. Now that it's started, you may wonder when is it going to stop. What we need to be concerned with IS it going to stop?
    1
  581. Trump is obviously laying low and Fox has little to report on/defend when that happens. So, newbies do these segments. I'm sure political commentators like Tucker and Hannity would turn their noses up at doing an actual news report.
    1
  582. Anyone else notice that all of the people posting negative comments about Donna Brazil's commentary don't actually include anything she said that was not truthful. Basically, the equivalent of screaming "Hoax!"
    1