Comments by "B Bodziak" (@B_Bodziak) on "Garland can 'clearly' be more transparent on Trump raid: Turley" video.

  1.  @craigslist9176  it's not a magistrate judge.
    2
  2. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    2
  3. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    2
  4. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    1
  5. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    1
  6. It's standard procedure to NOT release affidavits UNTIL an investigation is concluded OR there is an indictment that is due in part to evidence seized by the warrant. I can understand if the papers were somehow packed up accidentally, and I can even understand Trump wanting to keep "love letters" from Kim Jong. But, once Trump and his attorneys were made aware the boxes contained documents that had to be returned, why didn't his attorneys just return them? Seriously asking. The FBI was there in June and Trump wouldn't allow the agents to take them even though they had a subpoena. It seems this whole thing could have been avoided by just sending it giving them back. Has there been any coverage about this b/c I can't find any?
    1