Comments by "Serai3" (@Serai3) on "Kill Your Lawn | NYT Opinion" video.

  1. I didn't grow up with a lawn, so I've never understood the whole obsession with them. The area would be far better used for a garden, which could be at least partly used to grow food.
    315
  2. Oooo, looks like we've got a buthurt water waster here.
    5
  3.  @vylbird8014  That doesn't follow, dude. Having a big lawn makes no difference to how many people can live inside a house. Enormous mansions have big lawns, and yet they could house dozens very comfortably. They might mark out the wealthy VISUALLY, but they have nothing to do with keeping the number of occupants down.
    4
  4. Why? What's the point? Wild meadow would be much prettier, and wouldn't take up all that water.
    3
  5.  @xtins  Sure, because kids don't play on lawns or run around on them. Jeez, dude, think before you post.
    2
  6.  @vylbird8014  And that makes your point make even less sense. What in the name of the gods does the size of a lawn have to do with how many people can live on a piece of property? You've yet to explain this.
    2
  7.  @theguythatcoment  Inorite? I'm wondering what he even means when he talks about a "lawn". I'm starting to think he means a golf course. 😆
    2
  8.  @vylbird8014  AHAHAHA. Dude, NO property "needs" a lawn. Where did you get that idea? There are plenty of huge houses that have NO lawn and almost NO yard at all. Lawns are not in any way necessary. They are conceited affectations that waste land and water that could be MUCH better used. Jesus, you're such a shill.
    2
  9.  @Bubble-Foam  Use the entire lawn for what? You'll have to narrow it down more than that. I'm not a psychic, dude.
    2