Comments by "Umar Khan" (@umaralikha) on "AutoTopNL" channel.

  1. Thats the speed they reached, not top speed lol.
    21
  2. It does 100-200 in under 5 seconds, no 600hp car weighing close to 2 tons can do that.
    12
  3. The only Mercedes they 'lied' on was the S63 which only professionals can reach the claimed time. That's now changed on the 2018 S63. This E63S has already been proven to be faster than the claimed 0-60 time. Also, find me a stock RS6 doing the quarter mile in 11 seconds flat lol.
    3
  4. Stoyan Denkov The S Class is nowhere near as luxurious as any post 2010 Rolls Royce, I don't know what you or anyone else commenting is on about. Yes, it is overpriced but it is by no means below a S Class luxury wise.
    3
  5.  @jdfd4906  looll wtf, which stock sls does 100-200 in under 5 seconds?? Stock lamborghinis don't even do that...
    3
  6. MrAdoh2010 They are appreciating much more than either of those cars, so yeah.
    2
  7. I was wrong, I never realised it was in 5 percent intervals. I posted a picture on my google plus showing it. https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-o0kw8LF3on8/WR9QCaKz1II/AAAAAAAAKzo/TunV4gjm2Lo63_LITfHEblzTr3uld0DcwCJoC/w180-h320-p-rw/2017%2B-%2B1
    2
  8. stephan287 I know s class is the best... That's why I got one.
    2
  9.  @EVGUY13245  The owners had this interior installed, doesnt come like this from the factory. I think the owners a billionaire whos the richest heir in russia.
    2
  10. Hasan Al-habbobi The S Class isn't more luxurious, and it doesnt have a better ride. The maybach doesn't blow it out of the water either, I have a s class and have been in all of the aforementioned and am not sure how anyone is saying otherwise. Overpriced isn't a valid term since I would pay for It, and so would others.
    2
  11.  @Moritz0390  What do you mean? They have E63s, CLS63s, C63s, GLEs and G Wagons with 1000bhp, in fact there's some closer to 1300.
    2
  12. ManiakP0w3r The only cars in that list that would be faster would be modified gtrs, and twin turbod r8s. This thing is faster than the gallardo, m6, aventador, the f12, and probably the tdf.
    1
  13. +ManiakP0w3r A tuned M6 can make way more than 600whp, but unless you live in New York where they have them with Pure Stage 2 Turbos, they're not faster than this AMG lol. The 5.5 is also severely underrated from factory, even more than the 4.4 in the BMW, but that doesn't mean it can keep up with lower power. The only BMW M F(10,12 or 13) that's faster than this would be Allmotors(M Forum member) one which you almost certainly haven't have been in. The F12 TDF isn't faster than this, this does 100-200 (f12 tdf in 5 secs, this car shown in video) and everything above that faster. This car is 4matic, doesn't shred tyres and all times are shown on the vbox.
    1
  14. ManiakP0w3r You are just too blinded by being a fanboy. You can see this car can put it's power down without losing traction or drifting due to 4matic. The TDF is RWD meaning it would have more wheelspin than this. The old E63S lost speed due to 4matic, proven by videos of the E63 RWD vs E63S. C63 GAD does 100-200 in 4.6 while F12 TDF does it in 5.0 seconds. That's the one comparison we have for both vehicles. There's an over 200hp difference, chassis won't do much. It's like putting an M135I vs a M3.
    1
  15. Florian Kuche if they make an i8 M or CSl or whatever they wish to call it, I'm quite sure it would be able to beat those cars listed easily
    1
  16. The C63, especially this one is not shit lol, the TDF would probably easily beat it around the track, but you should see the C63 Black 5.5 v8 swap owned by DBassons on MBWorld. I'd say that the E63S lost on Chris Haaris video because of lack of DCT meaning it can't hold boost, and the 295s on the M6, wanna see what the new E63S though.
    1
  17. Do you know anything about the gaburing racing technologies BMW i8 with alpina 760hp 4.4 v8? I'm wondering how that would work and if there'd be traction.
    1
  18. ManiakP0w3r I don't understand why they don't use DCT, the one in the AMG GT is promising but isn't being used in other models for some reason. There's no DCT E63, but the new one seems rapid with one video showing 0-60 in under 3.3 seconds. It's purely petrol, will be tuned to 760-800hp, and is being modified for improved cooling and to allow wider wheels. It's over 700,000 euros I think though.
    1
  19. ManiakP0w3r They probably can and have already made a DCT, but there has to be a reason for them not putting it in the E63 other than torque or other fictional issues.
    1
  20. Swtch tB It's tuned higher than the AMG GTR
    1
  21. Jort Rinket Compared to a S63, yes, but what about the S65?
    1
  22. Jort Rinket Yeah, I'm talking about the M6 in this video.
    1
  23. Jort Rinket Not sure how the M6 works but apparently the Gran Coupe is faster than the coupe? If that was the case than I am guessing the s63 here would win again the m6 cp, and the m6 gran coupe pp would win against the s65. Not really sure.
    1
  24. Steffen Hill It shows it in 1 percent intervals
    1
  25. O J 3909lb vs 4399lb. M6 would obviously win. If it was the S65, or launch control was used, the S63 would probably win.
    1
  26. O J OK then, the S Coupe is lighter. I will have to find the 4matic weight since it is different. You have to admit though, if launch control was used the S63 Coupe would of won. There is a whole lot of things the S63 Coupe is that the M6 isn't. This includes being more luxurious, the ability to practically drive itself, the ability to curve into corners, and the list goes on.
    1
  27. O J Thats on the electric odemeter which seems slow, whereas on the main one you can see a different speed of less than 10kmh difference.
    1
  28. O J The S Class can do it without the computer which, and using the onboard system. Also look at 0:31, it is at 237ish if you look at the dash while the BMW is at 245ish.
    1
  29. O J That's the speed on the electric number one...
    1
  30. joopis16 Don't think the S63 has launch control. It also has a weight disadvantage, but of course isn't the alternative for the M6. It's more of a car for when you're a bit older than when you had the M6.
    1
  31. M S Have you heard of a lithium mine, and seen the pollution and people working at One??
    1
  32.  @thiccboi1726  Mercedes did too, they held the fastest 4 door record in the 60s-70s with the 300 SEL 6.3, 450 SEL 6.9 and later the 560 SEL
    1
  33. Teo Di. +untitled6981 +scorpserpentThe S63 is faster, even though it weighs more. The S65 is even faster and that still weighs more...
    1
  34. Radu Vlad No lol. The S63 is definitely as luxurious as the S8 any day of the week. Its also a LOT nicer to drive.
    1
  35. Alper Öz It's called a 765li... The S Class is much better in luxury, feeling, and smoothness but the s8 is faster...
    1
  36. An Aaron The S63 AND S65 cost more, but are still faster, much more luxurious and better cars overall.
    1
  37. Alper Öz ???
    1
  38. It's actually because the 'fuelometer' in the S Class moves in 5 percent intervals
    1
  39. Quarter mile in 12.2 for ZL1 and quarter mile in 11.2 for the SLS.
    1
  40. Taha Alhashemi So what? Thats 15-25% drivetrain loss which means roughly 600hp. 588RWHP ZL1s are doing quarter miles in 11.43. The SLS is still faster.
    1
  41. Taha Alhashemi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATdRgnMZoq4 Thats got good enough mods, and is still slower than the SLS, as well as have 80 more RWHP than yours. Talking about roads, you will have trouble putting down the full power to the ground as its RWD. Tractions going to be a problem since it's a tuned car. If its beaten on the track then it will also be beaten on the road, unless one car has drag slicks which neither of the them had. You may beat a C63 with a tune, which has 430ishRWHP but not a supercharged C63. 
    1
  42. Taha Alhashemi "Normal" ones, or the extreme such as the Hoosier A6 or g-Force R1s? I'm guessing you've done quarter miles when you've tuned your car and got drag tyres. Many C63s have superchargers, including record holders who do the quarter mile in under 10 seconds. PP Performance, if I remember correctly, should be local to you and would probably be happy to race you.
    1
  43. Will it be 2 litre? Nope.
    1
  44. Waleed Shehadeh The A45 is in early stages, whereas the S3/RS3 has been in development for ages. Wait for the new A45 which will soon be finished. Also, this car does 0-100km in 4.6 seconds tested, and its more than likely the RS3 will be a bit slower than what they say it will be. If they had the same horsepower it is more than likely the A45 would win.
    1
  45. Martin Merstrand What the fuck... 0-100kmh in 1.8? What are you smoking. You need a 2000hp gtr to do that.
    1
  46. Thao Nguyen M2 wouldn't work, since it can't be faster than the M4 and with over 380hp, the A45 will eventually be in M4 category and with a simple tune will beat it.
    1
  47. Tripod I wouldn't be surprised if it was an e500. The owners dad is worth around 10 billion dollars I think lol.
    1
  48.  @henzo7087  What times are you looking at bro, you’re wrong?? Its 3.89 for the M5 vs 3.45 for the GAD GTR
    1
  49.  @henzo7087  0.4 second difference 100-200kmh is a BIG difference when we’re talking under 4 seconds
    1
  50.  @nn-hz5cp  You can get next to 700whp with dp
    1