Comments by "Igor Muravyov" (@user-uk3nx8cn4u) on "Jamarl Thomas" channel.

Andrei Martyanov explains why the US cannot send troops there unless the US sits idle while its military ships get sunk and military bases destroyed . precision guided long range fires will make the deployment of forces almost impossible. The reason why we see no EU troops officially there any they are not getting officially hip by Isksnder and Kalibr missiles.
4
Correct. Besides, Moscow court ruled that a colour revolution happened in 14 and an illegal ukranian regime got into power. And on and on..
4
Mr P has already said on number of occasions the word Novorossia and the term "buffer zone". Mr T tries hard to make it his war that is getting not won. Regarding "Greenland", if its territory for taking then China and Russia can take it, at least a part of it and the US cannot do anything about it.
4
Is the US is the part of the conflict who initiated it in 2014? Are the US and its Nato pupets getting defeated or are winning? Should the perpetrator if the conflict, to losing side pay the tribute and concession to the winning side?
3
Mr T acts like a spoiled child with superiority complex, he states things he is not able to sustantiate. His administration scares nobody with that smoke his is blowing. Why he thinks the us can just walk away from the conflict with impunity is beyond my understading.
3
@KanyeDgit no it does not, what is "oblast" if not ppl and the assets. Who owned assets at the first place? A genocide or an ethnocide, what happened on historically russian territory is not a valid pretext for ownership change. Kosovo is a good example, albanians invaded it and commited ethic cleansing and genocide if serbs. (That's the majority of the world views it, Brics for instance, not turkey ) When Mark and so-called "russian leaders" talk about "western ukrain" they prefer to avoid talking about history, Lvov and so on in Galicia were all founded by russians and populated by russians until recently. Ocupation by poles or austrians does not make the territory or assets "their", besides 460k poles were serving Whermacht of wich 60k were fighting Red Army on the eastern front. Comunist-liberal (western ideologies) propaganda always prefers to avoid uncomfortable facts.
2
 @LeadLeftLeon b/c were invented and constructed merely a 100 years ago. They did not exist prior to 1914.
2
Mark is still rusophobic despite the fact that he lives in Russia. Russia is not occupying anything, but liberating its historic territory occupied by western anirussian project "ukrain". Let me remind you, Lvov is an old russian historic town founded by russians. There was no such a thing as "ukrain" or "ukranians" merely 120 years ago, prior to WW1. "Ukrain" is ethnic Nudelmans project. Why Mark conveniently forgets that fact, who created so called "ukrain" and for what purpose.
1
Missing demilitarization and de nutsi fikation part, these are the goals of SMO. Russia will achieve it with military and police force on the ground, that means there will be no more of western project of "ukrain" constructed on russian territory by western agents communists, trotsky and alike up to nudelman
1
@7inchdestroyer959 his ppl are in NYC, iz real and so on to start with, besides the tribe and the west considers the local population subhuman what has historic manifestation . Mr T is the US official and represents the US that has been involved there since at least 1991, its a fact. Its the US war.
1
@harryflashman4542 why should it matter? What's "ukrain", a self proclaimed criminal organisation? Where did they get the assets at the first place, stole it?
1
Suka is a female dog, not "mat" at all by itself and is actually used for dogs and non-offencive. Bliad means a promisuouse naked(openly) woman, a whore.
1
What mr T will do if Iran eliminates several us military bases in the region? Iran does not seem to be in the face saving done on it expense .
1
The US is the part of the conflict just like Germany or Austria was.
1
Enriched uranium!
1
Why should it matter if its russian territory? Historically it is. Communists who were western agents (communism is a western ideology the same as liberalism) attempted to make an antirussian project on historical russian territory. Ukrain is an illegal state, what was stolen cannot be legalized (unless its an Anglo-Saxon law, ask native Americans).
1
 @johnjacobsen1915 are you talking about migrants or other groups opposing Washington regime?
1