Comments by "" (@marijnnn4992) on "Defense News" channel.

  1. You got it wrong normaly it would take 1-40 drones for a abrams now it takes 1-80
    3
  2.  @bastiaan7777777  no because the fpv drones whit ammo cost 500+
    3
  3.  @bastiaan7777777  bud thats wont happen if there used in combined warfare or if the drone team is taken out
    2
  4.  @nightgooddogg  t90m only has a max reverse speed of 15 km/h and it has little armor and 25 mm he rounds are enough to ruin most the systems in the tank and its ammo is pretty weak compared to nato rounds and the space for the crew is realy small reducing efficiency its also hard to load and repairs also take longer then on nato tanks. the engine is also not very relaibable
    2
  5.  @nightgooddogg  russia got pushed back out of kyiv they had to retreated because they failed and challengers and leopards are getting used in pushes mostly not in the rear and ukrain has air defences witch stop russia from bombing there cities
    2
  6. they should equip them whit missiles that have a range of 10km to combat helicopters
    1
  7. only 130 bud mostly 2a4
    1
  8. only a 130 leopard 2 have bine send to ukrain and most of those are 2a4
    1
  9. the performance on the battlefield is far from zero and t90m sucks compared to the leopard 2a6
    1
  10.  @nightgooddogg  and boris has nothing to do whit ukrain fichting russia back out of the top part of ukrain
    1
  11.  @perfectcell1157  russian manufactoring is running at max and nato already makes 1/3 while not at max capacity in shell manufacturing and russia makes just about as many tanks as the nato countries claim to be able to make at max capacity and even nato reserve soldiers are train aswel or better then russia active service
    1
  12.  @SRB.4S  amerika hasnt stolen resources in syria and kosovo isnt occupied and they hasnt set up puppet terrorist goverments and a war against russia would not be a big problem for nato nato isnt ganna do trench warfare they wil crush russia pretty quick if china also declares war thats a different storie then they micht have a small chance of winning bud they still most likely wont
    1
  13.  @SRB.4S  the things you say about the pzh2000 and m777 are lies almost all western artillery systems including these have way better barrels whit a way longer life time there where also no problems whit the pzh 2000 optics and barely any pzh200 have bine destoryed
    1
  14.  @SRB.4S  challenger and the leopard have bine used in constant pushes and have proven that they are way better then russian tanks
    1
  15.  @SRB.4S  amerika never send a letter for the abrams to be pulled back from the front and they werent pulled back only soem for a short time because of a lack of spare parts
    1
  16.  @SRB.4S  and the abrams tank to ukrain the m1a1 only cost 4,3 million when it was first made
    1