Comments by "Jake Johnson" (@ElectronFieldPulse) on "Astrum" channel.

@shaydorahl6740 - I'm an atheist, and I still think the universe is beautiful. I don't see how people believe in a God given the compete lack of evidence, but to each their own.
6
It isn't an either because an ether suggests there is a uniform something out there. Fields aren't anything, they are just ways to describe quantum fluctuations which actually could make something.
2
@cakmamuhendis - There are a bunch of conspiracy videos on English YouTube as well. I think there are naturally curious people from every country, surely Turkey has some good science channels, right?
2
@astrumspace - That is exactly how you lose more serious viewers and eventually become one of those pop science channels no one trusts, losing you viewers in the long run. Your call obviously, but this is short term thinking. What makes YouTube videos stand out is their reputation.
2
@anonymous-rb2sr - Quantum field theory doesn't need saving, it is literally the most accurate scientific theory ever produced. If you don't believe in QFT, you would literally have no better reason to believe in any physics at all.
1
They should really explain that physics is all wave physics when you get down to it. Quantum fields produce particles when they have field exications, which are waves.
1
It is a product of wave mechanics, nothing more. If you know the momentum perfectly, that means it is a uniform wave everywhere, so there truly is no single position where it is at, it has the same waveform everywhere. It has nothing to do with philosophy, only waves.
1
@anonymous-rb2sr - You are wrong about how Hawking radiation works, it is a popular misconception that it is because of virtual particle pairs popping into existence. In reality, black holes restrict the vibrational modes available within the even horizon. That is why Hawking radiationn has a wavelength of the event horizon. By restricting quantum fluctuations, you will end up with quantum fluctuations carrying energy away from the event horizon if you do the math about how those quantum fluctuations occur around the area of the event horizon.
1
@avrenna - Fields are real, and photons don't interact with the Higgs field. See the problem?
1
@avrenna - Photons don't couple with the Higgs field
1
@Quickened1 - Black holes don't explode at a critical mass, what are you on about?
1
@Quickened1 - I have never heard a scientist seriously believe this idea. What 99% of scientists believe is that black holes just continue to grow until Hawking radiation destroys them in a very, very long timescale.
1
@wulfheort8021 - Well, no, not at all. All religions have the same amount of evidence, which is to say none. You and I aren’t so different, I don’t believe in thousands of gods, you don’t believe in thousands of gods except this one. My point is that every religion before you also said the exact same thing, and they were just as wrong as you are.
1
@anonymous-rb2sr - You are not correct. Photons have no mass, as is evidenced by thousands of experiments. They do have momentum, and that is where you may be getting confused. They wouldn't be able to travel at the speed of light if they had mass, as no massive object can. This underpins the theory of relativity, it has been known for over 100 years. Scientists also know that their theories break down inside a black hole. They don't actually believe there is a singularity there, the singularity in their math just tells them precisely that their theories don't work, because there are no actual singularities or infinites in the universe. You are so confident but so wrong.
1
Photons have no mass Conan, they have momentum though.
1
@conanthedestroyer7123 - You realize that isn't the whole equation, right?
1
@conanthedestroyer7123 - The original energy mass equivalence equation was e2 = p2c2 + m2c4. P is momentum, which a photon has without having mass. This is elementary physics, discovered over 100 years ago. You are glaringly wrong, like so bad it is obvious you don't know a thing about physics.
1
@conanthedestroyer7123 - Photons do not have mass, period. All experiments show this, and even the equation you tried to use earlier shows this. They have momentum, which is different from mass considering photons can never be moving at any speed except the speed of light. I'm sorry, but I trust actual science over the words of YouTube random people.
1
@conanthedestroyer7123 - Look up what momentum is at the level of quantum wavefunctions. Look at the units in the numerator and denominator. Then look up how mass is defined. I don't know how you could possibly say photons have mass, but you do you.
1
@conanthedestroyer7123 - How is it going to have a mass if does not interact with the Higgs field? You are suggesting an entire paradigm shift in physics, and I'm saying that I don't agree with it.
1
@conanthedestroyer7123 - Burden of proof is on those making the claim. I would say making a claim which contradicts physics for the last 100 years requires extraordinary proof. I have yet to see it.
1
@conanthedestroyer7123 - There is no force pulling the photon, mass bends spacetime and the photon simply follows a straight line through bent spacetime. You're wrong, and you will continue to be wrong.
1
A lot of the equations can be visualized though.
1
@anonymous-rb2sr - How is general relativity wrong? I mean, we know it isn't the complete answer, so it will be wrong on some level, but probably not how you're thinking.
1