Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "Astrum" channel.

  1. Citation needed for absurd claims.
    18
  2. You are making the mistake of claiming their representatives as ours. There is no "our."
    11
  3. ​ @SubparFiddle It makes even more sense after huffing paint thinner habitually while incuring numerous head injuries.
    10
  4. Should be easy to get into then. What are you waiting for?
    10
  5. No. If you wanted to be seen you would communicate using technology anyone can develop. The EM spectrum is ubiquitous. Hoping for some magic FTL communication that would literally break causality is silly. You will always be limited to 300,000 km/s as that is the speed of causality. If you somehow did you could communicate with your own past and destroy yourself before you communicated with yourself.
    10
  6. The fact that dark matter and energy make up the majority of the universe and we don't know what they are in no way implies we have little knowledge. There's just a lot of it. Both are supremely simple and uninteresting compared to normal matter and energy. Dark matter only interacts gravitationally and cannot form atoms or molecules. Dark energy is simply an expansive force that stays constant per volume of space so that as space grows, it grows. 95% of the universe might be dark matter or energy, but that's the boring part.
    7
  7. Citation needed for claims of things that you think seem to happen.
    6
  8. Trips to Mars are a one-way trip as we would be colonizing. No one ever went back to Europe from North America either. This is a non-issue.
    5
  9.  @dante7228  Dunning-Kruger much? Wow.
    4
  10. Celsius is the unit of science. Using both units and messing up the conversion is how we've lost multiple probes.
    4
  11. No it's not.
    4
  12.  @MrSladej  Nonsense statement.
    3
  13. The tides of the moon make life easier because of the stabilizing of the orbit's axis but aren't required. Why would they be? You could get VERY stable conditions in a "eyeball" world tidally locked to it's star as well.
    3
  14. You should publish your complete theory of gravity then and claim the Nobel Prize.
    3
  15. A thrown ball is actually weightless the second it leaves the hand as from then on it's arc is an orbit.
    3
  16. The title of this video is itself click bait. Obviously an ai bot comment.
    3
  17. ​ @justinjones5281 You're not supposed to drink the paint thinner.
    2
  18. No, time is defined by the transition of electrons in cesium-133, not the speed of light.
    2
  19. Is there a large impact crater at the antipode of the Pantheon Fossae? Edit:: I checked using Google Earth Pro and Basho is nearly but not quite antipodal to the Fossae. Could explain them.
    2
  20. Yeah, and the stuff across from you in your living room is a few millionths of a second in the past. We all know that light does not have infinite speed so far away things are not being seen as they are "now."
    2
  21.  @MrDeliriousNomad  Just Mercury would be more than enough materials.
    2
  22. Yes, let's reference a non-peer reviewed book published at the author's own expense in a field he wasn't educated in. Can't wait to get my plumber's book on commercial trade law.
    2
  23.  @JohnnyAngel8  No, then it would take less and less energy to accelerate a mass until it took no energy to go infinitely fast.
    2
  24. The space between us stretched. The galaxies aren't moving. Like dots drawn an inflating balloon. They get further away, but none of the dots are moving.
    2
  25. Your intro looks like a condom ad.
    2
  26. Not a very good one either since somehow the word that a big bad wolf is out there would have to be communicated to everyone.
    1
  27. @ 5:26 You spell it correctly but mispronounce it as "komalites." It is "komati-ites." No "L" included.
    1
  28. If you are talking about light, nothing.
    1
  29. There is no "below" in space and dark matter isn't there.
    1
  30. No.
    1
  31. Word salad.
    1
  32. When you control the power of thousands of suns the power of a beacon seems less than insignificant. Look up the Nicol-Dyson Beam. With a single star you can make a laser than can sterilize every system in the galaxy. You underestimate the power of advanced civilizations.
    1
  33. It's a rock.
    1
  34. Good thing NASA's entire budget is .3% of the national budget so it doesn't matter.
    1
  35. Physically impossible but ok.
    1
  36. Yes, fossil fuels to save the poor, give me a break. Obvious shill is obvious.
    1
  37. Your description of how central peaks form is incorrect and is contradicted by your visual at 35:59, which shows the peak forming from the rebound of the rocks that were compressed by the impact. This is shown by the black arrows.
    1
  38. You can reconstruct sound from video of things like windows or curtains. Couldn't a satellite use an ultraviolet laser to monitor your conversations?
    1
  39. Many features were discussed. Which "that" are you referring to?
    1
  40. It's still the internet.
    1
  41. The odds seem to be extremely high with how quickly it happened on Earth, so there you go. What's more likely, you are a common occurrence or a one in centillion chance occurrence? You aint special, kiddo and you just defeated your own argument.
    1
  42. Who cares when you have the power of a star on tap? Literally enough power to sterilize every planet in the galaxy if converted into a Nicholl-Dyson beam. If you have a problem you can make a solution if you control that much power.
    1
  43. Those are sprites. Glad I could help.
    1
  44. Oxygen =/ fuel
    1
  45. The lens absorbs the energy and becomes warmer, emitting infrared.
    1
  46. The first line is wrong. The age of the universe is wrong. Getting VERY sloppy.
    1
  47. We do not live in such a solar system and these would be statites, not satellites and not in orbit so if they are damaged they would just fall into the Sun. No chain reaction is possible.
    1
  48.  @whatthefunction9140  Yes. It's called a kugelblitz.
    1
  49. Different sized slits would let light of the same wavelength through at different times, which they do not.
    1
  50. No, the photon isn't larger. It takes all possible paths with the two closest slits being the most likely.
    1