Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "Motherboard" channel.

Why the re-upload?
28
Science channels often discuss hypothesis which, through lots of hard work and effort at finding evidence, often become scientific theories which describe facts in the natural world. Panspermia seems to likely be a possible way for life to spread between worlds so I see nothing counter-factual here.
7
+stratus10601 Only for you, bro!
5
@LabRat10101 Yes, there is more than one meaning to the word "nuclear" and the biological one has nothing to do with atoms splitting or joining. You're clearly trying to say stupid things that mean nothing. Stay in school kids, don't end up like this poor fool. Your own definition proves your point wrong FFS lol.
2
I don't know, it sounded like he said that he thought that intelligent life was highly unlikely and that's why he's studying microbes in hot springs and other extreme places because they can teach about where life can be in space, which we are a far more likely find than intelligent life as such life needs far more special conditions than hot spring sludge. That's his whole point and why he does this work. Look at our own planet, for example. I mean, he may not have meant that and asked you to change it, but your explanation makes no sense in relation to his work. He's looking for extremophiles exactly because intelligent alien life will be extremely rare compared to life in general. The editing error is in the re-upload.
2
DNA literally has nothing to do with nuclear reactions and life gets it's power from ATP, not fission you silly person. The mitochondria has nothing to do with atomic energy in any way even in your own description of how it worked, which was insane and wrong. Stop putting together words you heard adults use and go to school to learn what they actually mean.
1
@LabRat10101 Nuclear reactions are either fission or fusion; you said that "DNA is the recipe for atomic organic nuclear power reactors that feeds energy of atoms." Atomic nuclear power would involve fission or fusion. Mitochondria work using chemical reactions, not nuclear reactions. Did you not even go to high school at all??? How do you not know the difference between chemical and nuclear reactions??? If you want to know how mitochondria work in detail, look it up! No part of it will involve nuclear reactions. Chemical reactions involve the exchange of electrons between atoms whereas nuclear reactions involve the change of the number of protons in an atom through fusion, fission, or decay. Chemistry is unrelated to nuclear reactions. The body runs on chemistry. I don't know how many ways I can put this for you.
1
@LabRat10101 No, it produces energy by oxidizing the products of glucose into ATP. A chemical reaction. There is no atomic reaction. ATP is not created from protons one by one in some sort of atomic synthesis as you are suggesting. Stop making up bs and just look it up. I'm done trying to be your high school teacher.
1
@LabRat10101 Ok, but that wouldn't be a nuclear reaction. Just look it up ffs. You're wrong and the knowledge is nearly a century old.
1
@luciferz6405 Thank you.
1
@LabRat10101 "Professor Doofus" was the first insult thrown so get off your high horse. As to the Electron Transport Chain, atomic reactions don't involve electrons. Again, that's chemistry. Chemical reactions involve electron exchange, which is exactly what you are describing.
1