Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "Annoying eye floaters are actually helpful" video.

  1. How are they helpful then? You forgot that part.
    129
  2. In the same way that bleeding is a good indication of a stab wound. They just weren't paying attention.
    16
  3. Reported for spam.
    8
  4. +Lazar Kostic Fuck you, scammer.
    4
  5. Because they do and you're insane and have no medical background? Yeah, that seems like the most likely case. A worldwide conspiracy of doctors lying about eye floaters seems to be what you are suggesting, which is lunacy.
    3
  6. +Dain Sorensen So you think that evidence for eye floaters is this video??? LOL! You're too funny kid. You actually think that this video that we're watching on youtube is made by doctors? Or the animation? Yeah, that's how science and medicine work. They provide evidence via cartoons in youtube videos. You should do stand up comedy kid, I'm laughing my ass off at you. Just wow kid, wow.
    2
  7. +Dain Sorensen Still waiting to see the evidence of a world-wide eye-floater conspiracy, "bud." Is your tinfoil hat on too tightly? You are beyond stupid; you're up there with chemtrailers.
    1
  8. +Dain Sorensen You gave evidence of a worldwide conspiracy? Where??? The post with a link to the evidence must have been deleted by "them". You made a claim that all eye doctors don't know what they are talking about and are in a world-wide conspiracy to lie to you about their origins for unknown reasons, then provided no evidence of such. I do not need to do anything at all to prove you wrong as you haven't proven your claim to be correct. That which is claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Learn about the burden of proof kid; it's on those making the positive claim, not those that doubt them. Extraordinary claims, like world-wide conspiracies to lie about eye floaters, need extraordinary evidence too. The word of an anonymous clown on the internet isn't evidence either, kid. Especially when the medical community has come to this conclusion from their research. Provide peer-reviewed or legal documents to back your idiotic, dumb ass claims or STFU. Adults are talking. Also, no, I do not need to look up the evidence for the current consensus as it is already accepted fact in the scientific community. People challenging the consensus, which was built upon evidence not opinion, need to provide counter evidence, which you do not.
    1
  9. Also, I didn't change the subject, I compared you to a different group of lunatics that do not understand the burden of proof. Can you even read?
    1