Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "Dr Ben Miles" channel.

  1. ​ @Hirome_Satou Rockets are a tiny source of pollution so that's silly.
    9
  2.  @monstrositylabs  No it isn't. We cannot see our own past. We can only see the past of far away objects.
    8
  3. No mention because it doesn't work.
    4
  4. That's not a thing though and the hypothetical thrust is so low the Earth's magnetic field overpowers it. If it was powerful the effect wouldn't be subtle. Might as well hope for a flying carpet.
    4
  5. That's how rockets work, kiddo.
    3
  6. Or you just accept that some tasks take hundreds or thousands of years. Then you don't need new physics.
    3
  7. The entire universe is in space.
    3
  8. This would not effect Inflation. Inflation occurred at 10^-32 of a second after the Big Bang and its volume increased by a factor of at least 10^78. Time would have to move 10^78 faster, not slower.
    2
  9. Why would you subtract 50 from 40? There is no reason to find the inverse difference in travel times. We are not talking about the difference but how many times faster it is, which as you can see, 50 seconds is 5 times more than 10 seconds and 10 seconds is 1/5 of 50 seconds. Grade school math. Scientists know basic math and it's crazy you thought they didn't.
    1
  10. No. All light travels at the same speed in a vacuum.
    1
  11. If only you had any evidence to show what you say is true then maybe all those fools doing research could be shown the way. Also, relativity says time slows in gravity wells so it actually says the exact opposite of what you claim. Maybe, just maybe, the random burger flipper living in his mom's trailer could be wrong. Nope, you're right. Go get your Nobel Prize and Million Dollars. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
    1
  12. Why would black holes or lensing hinder and not help in that search?
    1
  13. Why do you think there's only a single photon in the pulse?
    1
  14. Also, the limit to how short the pulse can be is the time it takes one wavelength of your longest wavelength to pass a point.
    1
  15.  @CarFreeSegnitz  Light energy in a vacuum? How does that work? Energy cannot just be in nothing. What is it accumulating in? How are you transferring light energy into expanding spacetime?
    1
  16. By definition, no. Lensing does not change the speed of light.
    1
  17. Just total madness ending with a threat of eternal torture if we don't buy it. Ok buddy, you go worship a beast that tortures billions for eternity, we'll be adults in real life.
    1
  18. That's... what it is. You seem confused.
    1
  19.  @alanx4121  "Cancer" is no one disease so that is impossible.
    1
  20. You were able to make your post so there is your answer.
    1
  21. Well yeah. Time moves slower in a gravity well and as the universe expands it is a less and less deep. Time would still go on without expansion though, it would simply move at a constant rate.
    1