Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "California Teen Tries To Put A Stop To Wildfires" video.

Yeah, she didn't. The title makes no sense.
2
@DMC1982 How would that stop wildfires though, let alone 90%?
1
@DMC1982 So it's not going to stop wildfires at all now? That goal post is moving.
1
@DMC1982 So you don't know how it could actually help unless there were billions of them everywhere (all the forest is dry) and you don't know who will fund this. Neato kid. People who buy the car pay for the airbag. Your analogy doesn't apply.
1
@DMC1982 They're $120 each. Where will you get the trillions necessary for your plan? Actually it'd take 6.7 QUADRILLION dollars if you put one on 1 in 4 trees in the US. GDP of US is 21 trillion. Should take a while.
1
@DMC1982 The claim wasn't that it had any benefit at all but that it "could put a stop to 90% of wildfires." Why do you keep trying to move the goal posts even after being called out for it? As to bulk discount, yeah, maybe you'll get 75% off and only pay 1.67 quadrillion dollars and the US will be able to buy them in 80 years if our entire economy is focused on building these. Let's get started bro! You don't need food or electricity for the next 80 years, we have F.A.C.E.!
1
@DMC1982 Still not able to grasp that we're talking about the headline of this video. Must be a lot of lead in your water. My condolences.
1
@DMC1982 Why would I need to? I just looked up how many trees are in the US. You're really butt hurt that you're wrong lol. Also according to your information letting everything burn would be far FAR cheaper than your solution which costs over 41,000 times as much. 40 billion < 1.67 trillion. Are you TRYING to fail?
1
@DMC1982 ...because I didn't know you were this dumb. 1.67 quadrillion paid over 80 years would be over 20,000,000,000,000 or 20 trillion per year which is just a little more than 20 billion per year. Why did you make such a dumb post? This is simple grade school math and your plan costs 1000x as much as the fire per year. Are you ok?
1