Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "Scott Walker Mansplains Rape Pregnancies" video.

  1. Vote Bernie Sanders 2016 Damn it. Dafuq Pakman. Why shit on your base? Those 144k subs aren't all SJWs.  we're just regular libs who want to see you make fun of republicans.
    4
  2. jon ward Pakman is being kind of a dick here. I've been subscrfibed for 4 years now and he's starting to piss me off. Don't disagree with Cell BTW. If you don't vote Bernie, he'll simply absorb all of mankind.
    3
  3. Ronin Dave It's "Rabble! Rabble! Rabble!" good sir. Responding to his question instead of simply insulting him would also better serve your argument. Why is mansplaining not misandrist? Show him why he is wrong instead of passing back and forth dick jokes. You know, be an adult, take the high ground and all that.
    2
  4. Ronin Dave Both are pejorative terms based upon gender, although cuntsplain is plainly ruder, it doesn't remove the misandry of the term mansplaining. The word is meant to insult men in particular. Why the fuck am I arguing for him? I don't even care. You two just try to discuss things like nice adults, support your arguments with logic instead of insulting each other. I'm gonna go hit the bong and play some warthunder.
    2
  5. Ronin Dave So two wrongs make a right then?
    2
  6. ***** Patriarchy!!!!!!
    1
  7. Ronin Dave I didn't say they were equivalent. How does "mansplaining" avoid being sexist when it pertains to one sex only and avoid being pejorative when it's purpose is to dismiss an argument based upon gender? Cuntsplaining is certainly worse because of the more severe wording, but is not say, "womansplaining," or "chicksplaining," equivalent, sexist, and misogynist?
    1
  8. Ronin Dave It is if you are doing based upon their race or gender.
    1
  9. Ronin Dave Because......?
    1
  10. TheSeductiveGiraffe You are aware that appealing to common sense is an informal logical fallacy, right? Are you trying to fail on purpose? It's working.
    1