Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "Life on Earth Even OLDER Than We Thought" video.

  1. Mephistahpheles Believing in things for which there is no evidence because they make you happy is not valid reasoning to believe in something and once you teach someone to believe in things without evidence, you've entered very dangerous territory as beliefs inform actions. I have no need to disprove your claims as you have not supported them at all and they can therefore be dismissed. The reason the OP said that god must be complex and therefore must have a complex nature is that theists claim that since the universe is complex, it therefor it must have a creator (watchmaker fallacy). Refuting his point only serves to refute the theist point as he was simply using an extension of their logic to defeat them. Your attempt to further extend the logic however is self defeating, because if either god did not need a complex creator or god is not necessarily complex, then the universe did not even need a complex cause or creator and could have arisen naturally. As to refute your claim that unicorns and gods cannot be proven, you'd simply have to find unicorns somewhere or a being that could demonstrate powers only a god could have, like creating universe at will or juggling galaxies or turning all of space into Swiss cheese. It's not hard to prove positives. Further, if we're talking about Yahweh and not a god in general, Yahweh is disprovable. He didn't exist and was plagiarized from the Sumerian war god. He also makes mistakes, yet is supposed to be omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent.
    4
  2. +Mephistahpheles You cannot prove a negative, no one is trying to disprove god. Why try to disprove something for which there is no eveidence? It's like trying to disprove unicorns. You can't do it, but that's no reason to believe in unicorns.
    3
  3. donHooligan Yeah, that was the point. I guess it was over your head.
    3
  4. +Mephistahpheles Also, we're going to need to see your evidence for god always existing, especially since he hasn't been established to exist in the first place. You're making a lot of unfounded claims without any evidence, not a great start.
    2
  5. Mephistahpheles Lol, sophistry all. You're not even worth talking to.
    2
  6. +donHooligan Cool rebuttal bro.
    1
  7. itsasin1969 You either are responding to the wrong person or lack reading comprehension.
    1