Comments by "filonin2" (@filonin2) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1.  @Rud37Hsd  Running engines while spinning isn't going to get you to orbit, so yours is an odd comment.
    129
  2. There's an error @ around 10:30 where the video gets stuck on a repeating pic of the two towers.
    90
  3. 9:42 Oh, what's that double flash a few miles away? Better look with my telescope.
    28
  4.  @papalaz4444244  So just pure ad hominem then? We all noticed you entirely side-stepped his readily verifiable observation of reality that destroyed your point and instead attack his playlist and character. That's the kind of rebuttal either a child who doesn't know a better way uses or someone who knows they are wrong, if you rule out lead poisoning.
    18
  5. Those aren't just badges. Toyota is designing it.
    14
  6. Just knowing how cameras work proves them wrong.
    11
  7. The hydrological cycle and food web is much, MUCH less direct.
    10
  8.  @davidwebb4904  Seems like incel-only "knowledge."
    9
  9. Baffles exist.
    8
  10. It's a real shame most people won't see space x launches anymore.
    7
  11. The 747 is pretty darned good.
    7
  12.  @RenoDancesOnTheSand  Billions of safe flights are totally overridden by you knowing some dudes. Wow. Do you even see what you wrote? How did you not laugh at it while writing?
    6
  13. Seriously. He's reached 3/5 Sagans at least.
    6
  14. Top sex offenders list.
    5
  15.  @grandelDR  Why would you think that? What do you think that big space ship they're building is for? Are you the exec at Arianespace we're talking about?
    5
  16. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone claims that Harry Potter is a wizard.
    5
  17.  @r0cketplumber  That's what the reaction wheels are for, not the gyro. The reaction wheels dump their energy into the Earth's magnetic field using the magna-torquers. 6:28
    5
  18.  @michaelchadwick8261  NASA's entire budget is 1/1000th that, so you're pretty bad at math. No wonder you hate smart people.
    5
  19.  @debott4538  "Close" only counts in horse shoes and hand grenades.
    5
  20. Not even a millionth of a percent.
    4
  21. 0:06 Oh damn, I legit thought it was February still. Thanks Scott!
    4
  22. Debris? No.
    4
  23.  @glantani2842  They WANT to be there, they LOVE that they are "stuck" there, and they are not being harmed. You seem VERY confused and misinformed.
    4
  24. +TAPE Gaming We would not be visible as a civilization in the 6th century. They could likely see that there is life though.
    3
  25. The gravity well of Mars makes it far harder. No, we cannot make a laboratory that could automatically do everything one here could due to mass and cost constraints.
    3
  26. I've read your comment 5x and I can't makes heads or tails of it. Total gibberish.
    3
  27.  @ham4eo  You tell 'em Cletus.
    3
  28.  ꜱᴄᴏᴛᴛ ᴍᴀɴʟᴇʏ  Who do you think you are fooling with the crap?
    3
  29. You seem to have a great number of misconceptions about NASA and the cost to literally travel to other worlds. It's not going to be cheap to invent ways to do things no one else has ever done, but NASA still costs less than 1% of the Federal budget. It's about the cheapest thing there is in government.
    3
  30. They freeze then sublime to nothing.
    2
  31. What data do you expect to collect after the ship exploded? That's why the lost coms.
    2
  32. Ion engines only work in the vacuum of space and cannot take vehicles through the atmosphere because ion engines do not work in the presence of ions outside the engine. The ions can't fly away from the engine because there are ions in the air blocking them and you get no thrust. So step one is removing the Earth's atmosphere. After that it's pretty easy.
    2
  33. It would be nearly useless.
    2
  34. RADAR triggered artillery shells have been in use for like 80 years.
    2
  35. Why? Did SpaceX sue?
    2
  36. Why not use chlorine to burn silane instead of oxygen? Sure it makes SiCl4 and HCl, but at least they aren't solids.
    2
  37. Scott needed some decaf 😂. He kept cutting the guy off.
    2
  38. The probe is less dense than water.
    2
  39.  @treelineresearch3387  NASA is not a business. Business are run for profit and that is not the point of NASA.
    2
  40. Those aren't solely soviet attributes. Also seems to be a pointless observation since it's being developed by a private company. The opposite of communism.
    2
  41. fr
    2
  42. Armchair expert>>>>actual rocket scientist
    2
  43. How would a temperature difference lead to anything burning off? If they both remain a liquid it won't matter.
    2
  44. Couldn't you just shape the film like a cup or headlight reflector?
    2
  45. Zach Private You are thinking of something else. No one died in the Apollo Program except for Apollo 1 where the command module burned during a test on the launch pad and killed the three astronauts.
    1
  46. PsychoLlama You call me an idiot, yet you not only couldn't read what I wrote but you also think that a civilization in 600 A.D. would be detectable from many light years away? How, might I ask? They weren't transmitting radio signals, were they? Were they detonating atomic weapons or putting gasses that do not occur in nature such as chlorofluorocarbons into the atmosphere? No one said that there wasn't civilization in 600 A.D. Reading comprehension>you.
    1
  47. Kyle Lorrin Thanks.
    1
  48. ElfNet Gaming Who's to say there isn't an invisible pink unicorn watching over you? Being able to see events faster than light would violate causality. I'm open to arguments on how it would work but just suggesting that things which seem impossible may be possible isn't very useful.
    1
  49. ElfNet Gaming When you use the word theory as if it were a bad thing you reveal that you have no understanding at all. In science, there is nothing higher than a theory and a theory can never become greater than theory. Further, we can see billions of light years away. We know that the speed of light is the same everywhere. Your argument from personal incredulity is fallacious.
    1
  50. ElfNet Gaming I mean, you really are funny with how confidently you display your ignorance, like a child proudly showing their parents an interesting turd they found. Bravo kid, bravo.
    1
  51. Falcon is no longer under development. It's old and busted. Starship is the new hotness.
    1
  52. Like all new tech.
    1
  53. US Government and America are toast. Forget running water.
    1
  54. 7:25 Demonitized, lol!
    1
  55. Help me step-booster.
    1
  56. So, little people then? People with dwarfism would seem most ideal for brains/pound, I mean until we figure out a brain-in-a-jar solution.
    1
  57. It's landed 19x before and used it.
    1
  58. Yeah, there's no way they could have the water flow at higher pressure than the engine. /s
    1
  59. Yeah, Democrats save money while Republicans explode the budget with wars and tax cuts. This has been a concrete law for decades since Reagan. Are you a newborn or something?
    1
  60. Like throwing dinner plates at a heavy steel plate. So no.
    1
  61. That's a pretty hard tail strike on take off at 11:24. I'm surprised the engine didn't break.
    1
  62. That was the first launch a year ago.
    1
  63. What is there to wear? It's a steel plate 8+ inches thick with holes in it. How COULD it wear? It cannot possibly get hot with that much water flowing through it.
    1
  64. If you think that's even one of the main reasons you don't know what this device did and could still do.
    1
  65. He assumed his audience would already know them as he already did a video on that and viewers typically aren't totally uneducated in space and science. Don't worry champ, you'll get there one day.
    1
  66.  @spacexrocks1041  Actually the whole point of an SUV was indeed that it is built like a car with a uni-body instead of a body on chassis so that you get the ride and lighter weight of a car with the bulk of a truck.
    1
  67.  @beeman4266  It's a tiny, miniscule use of taxpayer money and it isn't wasted at all as all of the money goes right back into our own economy and new tech is developed as a bi-product. NASA is less than half a percent of our discretionary spending. You really need to look into where you are getting this false narrative.
    1
  68. 8:56 I wonder if this picture is at Security Park?
    1
  69.  @vavra222  What could a fine mist of water do? Nothing.
    1
  70. A "real spaceship in the movies"? Movies and the fictional things depicted therein are fictional.
    1
  71. ​ @tfrowlett8752 The telescope advertised in this video beats that by miles since having to find objects is for most people a negative.
    1
  72. "Mt" = megaton. I don't think it can lift 10^9 kilograms.
    1
  73. lol wut? The Space Farce doesn't have any bases.
    1
  74.  @TheGahta  You sound like a maniac and look very silly. You should probably delete these embarrassing posts or claim someone hacked your phone.
    1
  75. ​ @TheGahta  🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
    1
  76. Why would either matter? Wait, do you think the world is small enough that they are sucking away all the oxygen and heating the planet with rockets? Please tell me you think that lol.
    1
  77. It didn't rotate though. It did the flip as planned.
    1
  78. Is the game footage shown KSP 2? I didn't think it was out.
    1
  79. No.
    1
  80. Technically possible and very funny.
    1
  81. That would make as much sense as no having time zones on Earth, so none.
    1