Comments by "Wiczus" (@wiczus6102) on "Full Michael Drejka sentencing" video.

  1. The trial was just, his shooting was unecessary. But he didn't cause this confrontation. What the victim did, was in fact an assault and IF Drejka didn't shoot and been reasonable, the sides of the court would be reversed. Also telling someone to park elsewhere when is a small form of civil courage. It's as much of harrasment as telling someone to let pregnant woman have a sit in a bus. It is confrontational, but as long as you don't draw lethal weapons it is a good thing to do.
    1
  2.  @briansaiditsoitmustbetrue4206  again, the problem is the shooting. Always minding your own business and never speaking up doesn't sound like a good moral principle.
    1
  3. I mean, you can still be emotional about your dogs, even if they aren't equal to humans? Especially that people don't necessarily cry just because of one thing even if they say so. Also there is something like emotional proximity. So there is no point comparing his victim and his dogs. Sounds to me like you just attribute weirdness to anything he does, because he did a monstrous thing. You'd probably watch him eat a sandwich and say that he eats like a psychopath or smth.
    1