Comments by "secretgoldfish" (@secretgoldfish) on "Lex Clips" channel.

  1. 59
  2. 39
  3. 33
  4. 28
  5. 26
  6. 25
  7. 23
  8. 22
  9. 20
  10. 17
  11. 16
  12. 12
  13. 10
  14. 10
  15. 10
  16. 7
  17. 7
  18. 6
  19. 6
  20. 6
  21. 5
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. ​ @Jm-wt1fs  Lex is a self identified introvert despite ironically running the guest-heavy podcast/show that he runs daily (and as his job). 'Likes' aren't just about the mario-cart (or coin) inspired internet ones. They can often (and simply) evolve from the basic internal/human needs and desires that most folks have......and are often more about the simple desire for the (perhaps over-prioritised...or manipulated) approval/acknowledgement of others, where supposed introvertism can be EASILY and psychologically manipulated like many things (focussing on someone's inherent or chosen ideological beliefs is another really easy/effective/proven method) ......and especially so via sketchy/manipulative and 'by design' social-media platforms.....their algorithms (which strangely, but not so strangely, ONLY have 'thumbs up' but no 'thumbs down' responses).... OR via dodgier, more shameless folks than me, whose job and 'expertise' (like mine) IS and HAS always been TO manipulate folks (mine has been a 30+ year running career which has constantly creeped me out, despite appreciating the intuition it has taught me too, where the 'methods' are something to always be wary/skeptical of). Maybe I'm too harsh on Lex but really like him too despite the criticism, I hope he does well AND see big potential for more in him too....but I'm also wary that he's easily manipulated by others and his own personality/nature too, like many well intentioned (and 'smart' more than perhaps 'wise') folks. .....especially nowadays in an era where narcissism (in many outward or subtle ways) is clearly being over-encouraged in order to more easily divert and then manipulate folks (often resulting in 'useful idiots' FOR others unfortunately), then you also have all the encouraged self-righteousness, binary wrong/rights and lack of discussion that you mentioned, which Lex's politeness can also indadvertedly end up over-compensating for/too despite his best intentions while hoping to be a polite-considerate instead (but perhaps a little naive regarding deliberate manipulation) while the TED-talk like salesmen guests grift on his supposed introvert but who could probably do with more pushback despite the algorithm, the creeps and their hopes (and over 'encouragement'). Appreciate your comments and willingness to discuss though JM, I pretty much completely agree with you but also have my skepticism too, especially in our creepy age of manipulation (and apathy), have a good one and cheers from the ether of the internet!
    2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. Communism is ultimately (and sadly) just a self-serving Cult of Supposed 'Good Intentions' deliberately NOT further considered.....sold to the well-intentioned but easily-led/manipulated via the tried and trusted "just tell em' something pretty" method ......by shamelessly self-serving grifters and hypocrites who lack a conscience but definitely NOT an ego while far too easily and self-conveniently convincing themselves ......of themselves.  They don't like or understand/appreciate established (and inconvenient to them) morality and think that virtue is something you can simply SAY instead of actually BE while over-hoping that hollow words will compensate, balance and suffice for their own nasty and self-serving selves. They then HAVE to create their own self-serving reality and negate any critical-thinking based opposition to their own fragile egos and selves ......to simply avoid any potential (and inconvenient) self-realisation of their own shamelessly self-justified and self-serving nastiness. They also need an army of useful-idiots to help their new-reality ambitions....and the best way to do so is to 'encourage' the masses into a self-sense of victimhood. When the useful-idiots are led by emotion (especially anger) at the expense of their better/more-considered critical-thinking then they too will self-justify ANY self-serving thing to themselves......and ironically FOR their original manipulators, just as their also self-serving manipulators always unfortunately intended.
    1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. The "One China Principle" is an agreement between the two STILL existing governments/sides of the UN-ENDED/UN-FINISHED civil war (the PRC and ROC), where BOTH agree that it is in BOTH of their best interests (ie no war) to one day re-unite.  The 'principle' (and its deliberate diplomatic-vagueness/greyness) HAS KEPT the peace since. .......which is threatened whenever the self-conveniently clueless (while shamelessly self-serving) CPC threaten to invade 'unite' Taiwan/ROC while interpreting the Principle in their own self-serving way (which isn't remotely surprising when they're an authoritarian communist cult). Taiwan/ROC officially declaring itself independent (even though it IS in self-governing actuality) also threatens to break the agreed-upon Principle (especially while it is still part of their constitution).  Taiwan doesn't threaten to invade 're-unite' the mainland either anymore, after once having its own 'ambitions' (and self-serving 'interpretation'). The US 'One China Policy' is a simple US diplomatic acknowledgement of the One China Principle agreement, which is why the US fleet sail between the strait whenever the PRC threaten to invade 'unite' Taiwan/ROC, to remind the PRC of their own agreed-upon Principle (while bully-reminding the bullies that their are bigger potential bullies/consequences). The supposed-diplomacy PURPOSE of the UN (while also self-interested/serving....or just easily bought) is thankfully NOT (yet) a world government despite its authority(arian) ambitions .....and doesn't even acknowledge the inconvenient REALITY (or allow representation) of Taiwan/ROC despite the inconvenient ACTUALITY. The 'China' you speak of in the constitution is a potential future (and united) China......which you're confusing with the CURRENT CPC ruled PRC China, who CLAIM (while shamelessly self serving) to be the self-proclaimed authority of ALL things Chinese and the only 'China'.....despite the REALITY of the self-governing (and previous government) Taiwan/ROC ALSO still existing. You SHOULD know all this being Taiwanese.
    1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. ​ @shatzofhudson  When it's too hard to further consider the original post/opinion (or context) distract instead (and maybe passive progressive/aggressively name call! too) 'mythological ideal of meritocracy' ....yeah it's such a MYTH (despite the reality of how so many of the genuinely good things in this world have come about). 'enshrine meritocracy'? .....maybe have a further think about what the opposite of that hyperbolic (and telling) binary actually implies (and then self conveniently concludes in)? It's strangely NOT a case of one or the other as much as the deliberate (and self-serving) ideological based manipulation and less-think would have you believe. Those good ol' 'structural and historical factors' (and deliberately self-serving half facts/stories) ARE something to consider ......but perhaps less so while so emotionally and ideologically led, manipulated (and then unfortunately devolved). .....especially when deliberately not further considered past the self-serving and self-convenient parts. The REAL and bigger issue is (and always has been) the sketchy and unfair leveraging of power, but we don't like to talk about that (and distract via the emotive instead) because the new cult would like to reserve the opportunity (and hypocrisy) to sketchily leverage-power against others themselves while telling themselves something overcompensating, pretty (and self serving) instead. No system is perfect and should always be open to questioning but the ideas are often something to aspire towards.... WHILE led by further considered critical thinking (inclusive of the self and the self-serving) rather than by easily-manipulated emotion (and deliberate self-serving, less think). The supposed 'equity' narrative (and ideological grift) and the deliberate self-loathing (while ironically) narcissistically over-encouraged (to then self-justify the self) manipulation narrative will unfortunately just manipulate and further devolve us all into ideo-devolved serfs to the original manipulators via the 'cult of good intentions' deliberately NOT further considered......as the manipulators sadly intended!  .....via those deliberately easily-led and manipulated by emotion (and self-loathing/self-victimhood) to then sadly self-justify pretty much anything including themselves AND ironically their original manipulators (to themselves mostly) while self-fulfilling their useful-idiot role and unfortunately negating individual self-determination for a return to conformist tribal mentality which we once aspired to rise above. This has all happened before.....and will unfortunately happen again, especially when emotional based manipulation (and ideo-based/devolved less think) trumps further/wider considered critical thinking.
    1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1