Comments by "secretgoldfish" (@secretgoldfish) on "Would Tucker Carlson interview Hitler? | Lex Fridman Podcast Clips" video.

  1. Cluelessly (or deliberately) helping to 'motivate' or create future context-lacking clickbait and cheap headlines for other folks like.... "Tucker is so shameless that he'd even interview Hitler....in his OWN words and admission!"
    3
  2. Tucker should have simply called out Lex's lameness here while Lex badly attempted to help create (intentionally or just cluelessly) other lame and self-serving narratives and future clickbait/supposed 'stories' such as..... "Tucker is so shameless that he'd even interview clearly evil Hitler.....admitted in his OWN words!"
    2
  3. The mere mention of Hitler (in word and in person) has sadly lost a LOT of meaning nowadays while increasingly just becoming a lame and easy manipulation tool, and especially so if not wanting to pursue genuine bigger/further-considered discussions ......where the word has now been subverted to just serve as obvious boogeyman fodder and then deliberately less-considered, easy and self-convenient/serving negativity comparisons...... for the simpleton (and conformity-devolved) cult unfortunately....where his evilness is a clearly obvious and not even in question but the purpose of badly using him as a dodgy and comparative hopeful-manipulation tool probably should be.
    1
  4. What a lame and badly loaded question in such passive-regressive times......and especially so when simply considering all the years since nasty H with all the baggage (justifiably) added to his now dead (and boogeyman/allegorical) modern use/definition/character. Tucker should have answered "which Hitler?......the one we happily lent money to for a while when self convenient.....or the one post-crazy-holocaust who now thankfully CAN'T be interviewed in good-riddance death".
    1