Comments by "secretgoldfish" (@secretgoldfish) on "Gad Saad" channel.

  1. 657
  2. 61
  3. 39
  4. 30
  5. 23
  6. 20
  7. 13
  8. 9
  9. 9
  10. 8
  11. 7
  12. 7
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. Gad, why even get involved in a 'pissing in the wind' argument/distraction regarding 'academia' self-righteousness when it has clearly been shooting itself in the face (while deliberately self-devolving itself) for a while now..... as it also now exists even more so in it's own institutionalised/ideological, sheltered-workshop and bubble while so increasingly (and sadly) removed from the REAL world unfortunately? I too am a university lecturer (with less credentials but perhaps more working/industry-world experience) and now sadly have FAR less respect for the current world of supposed academia (and other institutionalised umm 'institutions') and have felt so for a while now based on my own observational experiences while simply attempting to teach ideation and creativity (thinking different).  Is this REALLY any surprise and is it even worth comparing (and being distracted by) dick sizes especially when one side cannot even acknowledge basic biology and objective reality? My particular creative 'expertise' is one of manipulation and if you can confuse a supposed thinking mind that simple biological reality (man/woman) doesn't exist then you can convince-manipulate the same folks of pretty much anything, which has been the creepy plan from the very beginning where zero/subjective morality is simply the next step to then help self-justify ANYTHING unfortunately. Orthodox Jew Teddy White once visited current China back in the early days as a correspondent/diplomat. When he arrived at the pre-prepared banquet he regrettably informed his communist Party host Zhou Enlai that as an Orthodox Jew he could not eat the awaiting suckling pig.....Zhou apparently comforted Teddy by declaring that in China a pig could also be a duck if it needed to be.......where the two then sat down and enjoyed their duck together!
    1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. It's all just another sad part of the increasingly-creepy narrative from the increasingly-dubious folks now so hoping to over-control other folks by changing the very definition of accepted and simple objectivity/reality....... so that those same other folks, who are overly and easily-led by emotion and nice sentiment (instead of further critical-based thinking......while telling themselves something pretty) will then be more easily manipulated to then also believe (and accept) pretty much ANY newly defined umm 'reality' moving forwards (but also unfortunately backwards).....and especially so when so many have now become overly-apathetic and easily-led to find their life meaning from the 'likes' and 'upvotes' of others in a world where both narcissism (and nihilism) over-encouragement has been sadly over-prioritised over other pursuits such as the merit-based ones or simply trying/thinking harder. It's all unfortunately like a bad 'idiots guide to manipulation'......but for sheep or parrots! 'Man and women' is a great place to start......If you can persuade folks to question that simple biological reality/truth you're almost guaranteed to be able to convince them of ANYTHING moving forwards (while backwards!) Authoritarian objectivity (and then reality) is simply what you say it is; When Zhou Enai of the Chinese communist party met orthodox jewish US reporter/ambassador Teddy White at a banquet featuring a suckling pig back in the day, he convinced the hesitant Teddy that in China a pig could be a duck if it needed to be and that his awaiting banquet featuring the suckling pig was therefore ok to eat…..which Teddy did….for the sake of politeness and diplomatic good intentions. The old term 'Political-correctness' (derived from and in the Soviet Union) now likely over-impresses even itself!
    1
  96. 1
  97. 1