Comments by "" (@rvdb8876) on "Dr. John Campbell"
channel.
-
745
-
590
-
281
-
153
-
150
-
117
-
83
-
57
-
43
-
40
-
39
-
38
-
33
-
30
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
Sobering that reality shows what a layman like me knew from the beginning when they turned this whole affair into a pandemic.
Developing vaccines against such rapidly mutating viruses is hopeless and this is a science as old as the hills.
It is impossible because these kinds of viruses mutate like crazy.
Science knew this.
Why then was it forced with experimental vaccines that were put together in a few months?
This "policy" was doomed to fail.
A 3rd or 4th booster shot?
As Professor Theo Schetters said, "An extra shot of a vaccine based on the original Wuhan strain will be of no use."
"Even if they gave you 20 injections, the virus has meanwhile mutated hundreds of times and it won't help."
The slogan "The vaccine will be our salvation and will defeat the virus" turned out to be a hollow phrase, say "lie".
Yet people still try to justify the fairy tale with the slogan: "You will get less seriously ill, thanks to the vaccine".
That remains to be seen, as the virus continues to mutate uninterrupted, further and further away from the original Wuhan strain.
Moreover, if one were to develop a vaccine against the most recent mutant, it too would continue to mutate and undermine the effectiveness of the vaccine(s).
Just like with the flu virus, which one they cannot eradicate.
If you are vaccinated for flu in November, the upcoming variant is not yet known.
They therefore inject you with a cocktail of three or four known (recent) variants, in the hope that it will work to some extent.
In some cases (winters) this is disappointing and the protection among the population seems to be very low and only 15%.
As a result, some years, unfortunately, there are still many flu deaths to regret.
7
-
7
-
7
-
@OceanFrontVilla3
Well, I didn't want to mention it at first, but apparently the governments have forgotten about the 2009 debacle, when they vaccinated against swine flu.
I didn't want to mention narcolepsy, but it has mostly affected toddlers who still had 70 to maybe 80 years of life to come, but whose lives were totally destroyed by this incurable condition so unbearable to live with that many narcolepsy patients commit suicide.
The vaccination campaign in 2009, unnecessary because the epidemic was already on its way back, was stopped and the vaccines were destroyed.
Afterwards, every effort was made to deny the link between the narcolepsy cases and the vaccine.
Still, the Dutch government paid some of them compensation, because the vaccine manufacturer had been given carte blanche and could not be held liable.
The same is happening now.
If things ever go wrong, the vaccine manufacturers will go free and the government will pay for the damage.
For the record, the government is WE, the taxpayer.
No vaccine is without risk, keep that in mind.
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Raylufc
I had the same symptoms, not after the vaccination, but after the infection with corona in May last year.
Symptoms like a mild flu.
The worst symptom was an inexplicable tiredness.
This resulted in me staying in bed all day, so that the following days my biological clock was completely disrupted, like a jet lag.
I am not young, I was 66 during that infection, now almost 67.
I think a healthy body has little to fear from this virus.
I have never smoked, don't drink alcohol and with age I started to pay more attention to my diet, little sugar, less fat, meat and lots of fresh vegetables and fruit.
Oh, important, I don't take any drugs.
I think a lot of the corona cases that are badly affected are people who are heavily on drugs.
I am still active professionally, but because of all these corona measures in the past year I have only been able to work at 15%, given that my company is subject to severe restrictions.
I still do this at my age, because I like to do it and it gives meaning to my life.
It also keeps me physically and mentally healthy, I think.
But now because of these measures, in my country my company has now come to a standstill, my physical condition is suffering enormously.
I also have a very hard time psychologically.
I feel totally useless and worthless.
The weather is good today, so I go for a walk to maintain my fitness.
But it's just just wandering around aimlessly.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@mrmaskerville
My recommendation?
I don't recommend anything.
I don't talk people into anxiety psychosis.
Why is the entire population locked up in quarantine?
This is not normal.
You realize that, I hope?
It is normal for sick people to be isolated and not the healthy ones.
When I get the flu, I don't even go to the doctor because I know he can't do much more than prescribe an antipyretic.
Then the question is whether it is advisable to suppress the fever, if it does not get too high.
No, if I get flu symptoms I just stay indoors.
The fact that people die, usually with a life-threatening condition, also often happens with the flu or even a banal cold can kill an old and / or unhealthy person.
Destroying an entire society and economy for this is criminal.
Because despite the destruction of the economy, our savvy governments have been unable to do anything about the number of victims.
In Peru, where the strictest lockdown was introduced and enforced with a heavy hand, manu militari, the figures are downright bad, while in Russia, where virtually no measures apply, the figures are falling.
It does not get through to the hydrocephalus minds of these incompetent politicians that all they have done is to disrupt the economy.
For a disease whipped up by the WHO with the lie that 3 to 4% of all infected people would die.
While the WHO figures now show that the IFR is only 0.23%.
Which roughly corresponds to a severe flu.
This may be based on manipulated data, because someone who works in a care center for the elderly, said to me, after I asked if they had not had too many problems with corona, he said, "No, we had no contamination in our retirement home, but every elder who died since mid-March was given corona as the cause of death on his death certificate. "
Shocking, isn't it?
Maybe you should listen to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOLhF9fyjkk&t=2274s&ab_channel=DeNieuweWereld
It is with English subtitles.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@333vang4
- Not only do cold symptoms stay away, but also my bowel function works much better now, no more constipation.
This is not insignificant, since poor digestion can be the cause of many ailments and can also affect other organs, liver, kidneys, etc.
I feel really good and the only thing I regret is that I didn't start sooner.
Because I used to suffer from long-lasting colds, especially in winter.
I don't take vitamin C because I eat enough fresh fruit and vegetables.
I may have been infected a few times during all that time, but if there are no symptoms, it goes unnoticed, doesn't it? -
3
-
3
-
@irishcanuck9489
Quote: "they (scientists, epidemiologists, virologists) knew it would mutate therefore there was from the beginning, uncertainty about long term efficacy...."
You mean it was/is actually a large scale experiment?
I agree, given that the so-called vaccines, depending on the manufacturer, are still in phase 3 of the experimental stage until 2023/24.
According to the Nuremberg Code, subjecting people to a medical experiment without their consent and without informing them that they are being subjected to an experiment is not allowed, say forbidden.
Nevertheless, the experiment failed.
3 jabs in less than a year, you can't call that a vaccine by the best of will.
By comparison, for measles you get one jab and you are immune for the rest of your life.
Yet the experiment continues and the masses still believe the doctrine they were brainwashed with with the help of media propaganda.
The wet dream of these pharmaceutical companies is becoming reality, making a lot of money from an almost endless experiment, without being held responsible in any possible way.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@cgjoe64
I fully understand your frustration.
Downplayed is the correct word.
But why is it downplayed?
An analyst in the Netherlands, named Maurice de Hond, came to the same conclusion.
It surprised him that so many people suddenly became infected during the carnival, which is celebrated exuberantly in the south of the Netherlands (February/March).
The contamination in the ski resort Ischgl in Austria also attracted his attention.
He analyzed these events and found that the infections did not occur outside on the street or on the ski slopes, but during the after parties and apres-ski parties in closed halls, where many people gathered, many of whom (massively) became infected by inhale the contaminated air for hours.
Air that may have been contaminated by only one or a few people.
But in this poorly ventilated space, hundreds of people could be infected through the air.
As an analyst without a medical background, he contacted various epidemiologists, also abroad, who confirmed his analysis that it is transmissible by aerosols.
Maurice de Hond ran against a wall of indifference and reluctance at the government in the Netherlands and the Dutch RIVM still calls aerosol contamination "negligible".
You would think that if you were in a crisis, you would listen to any good advice that is given to you.
Not that you should just accept that good advice without hesitation, but at least you should look at it and study it.
But they (the government) did not do that.
Marice de Hond is also very frustrated, because he realizes how much suffering could have been avoided.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I respect you Dr. John Campbell as long as you talk about medical issues, which is your field of course.
I'm also following your advice on vitamin D, and not just because you say it, but because all science now clearly points in the direction of how important it is to the proper functioning of our bodies and immune systems.
I find it very mean of you to call people concerned about the vaccine "anti-vaxxers."
I am not an anti-vaxxer at all, I am 67 years old and have been vaccinated against smallpox, polio and tetanus.
Not for measles, because when I was a kid we just got those teething problems and we weren't vaccinated for them.
Not an anti-vaxxer, but to be fair, these vaccines have only received experimental approval and beyond their immediate adverse reactions, the long-term effects could not possibly be tested in the space of a few months.
In my country there are many GPs who say they will not get vaccinated.
They are of course well aware that the mRNA vaccine is experimental and is being used on a large scale for the first time in humans.
I also do not support your enthusiasm for the "political" decisions to introduce stricter restrictions (lockdown, curfew, etc).
A few days ago you were surprised that the corona numbers in Russia fell, while there are almost no restrictions.
You also demonized Peru for the bad results.
This while Peru is one of the countries where very strict corona restrictions apply, which were imposed with a heavy hand, manu militari.
Do you still not realize that you have to ask yourself serious questions about these strict restrictions on liberty and human rights?
Then there's the bullshit of downplaying the adverse vaccination reactions.
They were due to "underlying diseases in many of those elderly".
It is strange that this same narrative is not used for the same elderly people with underlying diseases when they become infected with the corona virus.
How do you call something like this in English: "a double standard"?
Moreover, there are not only elderly people who had adverse reactions after vaccination.
The pdf file below from VAERS also demonstrates this:
https://mega.nz/file/WwIVSAjA#C7zHYRXPwxW1Lr555ypRaLuUfRUeLatVs7aF5FgO2Co
The document is several days old and the list continues to grow.
You can see that completely healthy people, who are not even in the risk group in terms of corona, nevertheless suffered serious, sometimes fatal or permanent injuries, after the vaccination.
The second injection in particular sometimes leads to violent reactions.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@leapingjoseph8462
I posted this earlier, but apparently all posts are not visible.
I try again:
I take 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily and 5,000 IU in the summer.
Vitamin K2mk7 200 µg daily
Zinc 20 mg daily
Vitamin B12 1,000 µg daily, because older people like me absorb less of it from food.
I also take magnesium regularly.
Not only do cold symptoms stay away, but also my bowel function works much better now, no more constipation.
This is not insignificant, since poor digestion can be the cause of many ailments and can also affect other organs, liver, kidneys, etc.
I feel really good and the only thing I regret is that I didn't start sooner.
Because I used to suffer from long-lasting colds, especially in winter.
I don't take vitamin C because I eat enough fresh fruit and vegetables.
I may have been infected a few times during all that time, but if there are no symptoms, it goes unnoticed, doesn't it?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gandiganda5
Well, I can tell you this from personal experience:
At the end of May 2020, I met someone who works in a nursing home for the elderly.
Curious as I am, I asked him if they had not had too many problems in their retirement home due to corona?
He said to me:
"We have not had any infection in our nursing home yet, but every elderly person who has died since mid-March was given covid19 as the cause of death on the death certificate."
I was perplexed by this shocking data manipulation, say fraud.
From the doctors in Bakersfield, California, we have known since their press conference in April 2020 that these doctors were also pressured by the government to list covid19 as the cause of death on death certificates as much as possible.
Rest assured, if the data is provided by the government, it is dubious.
If this data has been manipulated, then this data is completely useless for making analyzes and drawing conclusions from it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@cgjoe64
Did you know that the minister of public health in the Netherlands, Hugo de Jonge, forbade GPs to prescribe HCQ?
He called it quackery and commissioned studies on people in intensive care who received harmful high doses of HCQ.
Completely against the practice of the general practitioners, who administered HCQ in a low (safe) dose immediately after the first symptoms, so right after the start of the infection, in order to prevent hospitalization.
Fortunately, studies from abroad are now pouring in that confirm the effectiveness of HCQ in primary care, before hospitalization.
This minister literally has blood on his hands, but appears almost daily with his head on TV, without shame talking about social distancing, mouth masks and other restrictions and vaccines.
There is probably too little profit to be made from HCQ.
As you say, it comes down to money
But you should not think that way, because then you will be dismissed as a conspiracy thinker.
At least it still has the word "think" in it.
What we cannot say about their political narrative.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@richardw2646
Quote; "but the rest of the world knows the truth'".
You mean your truth?
The figures I gave are the WHO figures.
You juggle with figures ranging from 0.5 to 1%?
An increase from 0.5 to 1% is an increase of 100%.
So you do use a very stretchy elastic.
I don't know where you get your data, but I have no desire whatsoever to get you out of your fear hypnosis.
So it doesn't matter what I think or you think, does it?
I just find it strange that there are people who just take a risk without thinking, without realizing it.
Well, that is not really strange, because the media propaganda does a good job of promoting (free) advertising for the vaccine manufacturers.
When it comes to a disease such as smallpox, tetanus or polio, a vaccine can be justified.
Even if these vaccines have side effects.
But in this case it is indefensible.
The mutational properties of these viruses is the main reason why vaccine manufacturers never attempted to develop a vaccine for them.
Because the development of a valid vaccine takes about 5 to 20 years to study its long-term effects.
Something that has not happened here and that can't be done with these mutating viruses.
Hence the 2009 debacle with the swine flu vaccine.
The fact that they are now (again) trying to force this is a complete mystery to me.
They clearly haven't learned anything from it.
But when it all goes wrong, the true responsibles will escape their responsibility, the victims who have walked into it with their eyes closed will bear the consequences.
In any case, I am not walking into it.
By no means.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The importance of vitamin D is indeed greatly underestimated.
It is being silenced in the media.
When they do talk about it, it is laughed at and even dismissed as quackery.
Same with Ivermectin, by the way.
Even a lot of doctors don't even realize the usefulness of vitamin D.
They prefer to prescribe drugs.
I take 100 µg (4000 IU) per day and I feel very good and healthy.
Unlike a vaccine, vitamin D offers many additional health benefits that a vaccine, (with side effects), cannot possibly achieve.
You can clearly see from the propaganda in the media that it has nothing to do with public health anymore, but the media is simply complicit in the agenda that was agreed at the Euro/American level with the vaccine manufacturers.
The constant hammering in the media on vaccines and vaccination speaks volumes.
Not to mention how they try to justify the absurd corona measures (lockdowns and the like) in the media.
While it is now gradually becoming clear that vaccinated people can also become infected, the fairy tale is that they would become less ill.
But vaccinated people do receive a free pass to infect everyone freely, given that their virus load, when infected, is the same as unvaccinated.
The logic is completely lost.
Fortunately, more and more people are starting to see it.
Better late than never? (question mark)
2
-
2
-
@7YBzzz4nbyte
Thanks, for the Swedish link.
I see remarkably few deaths in Sweden now, in a period (from September) that the number of diseases and deaths traditionally increases annually as winter approaches.
But I see a huge discrepancy between the number of deaths/cases of the "real" epidemic in the spring, compared to what we see now.
That is why this increase is often called a "casedemic" by many people.
Anyway, I think the virus had its best time.
It is clear that group immunity among the population increases with each infection, as a result of which the virus loses its breeding ground.
Apart from seasonal effects (summer), the virus will continue until that point is reached.
One can try to influence it by all kinds of tricks, for example by lockdowns and the like, but that is all only of a temporary nature and can not stop the virus.
Many countries are now catching up with the virus, as they were able to reduce it sharply in April/May with strict lockdowns and were subsequently spared by the summer period.
In Sweden, there was a much slower decline in May, making it look wider, as is usually the case with a flu epidemic.
Belgium and England applied a lockdown this week, while the number of cases was actually leveling off.
This could not possibly be due to that lockdown.
The government-paid virologists shouted for a lockdown and the government went to its knees.
But the only effect that such a lockdown has is that they will stretch the case and the epidemic will last longer.
Correction, not "the only effect".
Another effect is that this "second" lockdown will be even more dramatic for the economy than the first lockdown.
Because many small and medium-sized businesses are already on their knees, making this a final blow to many of them.
2
-
1
-
1
-
Pfizer was not asked to investigate whether the "vaccine" would prevent the spread.
This was not necessary for the emergency approval (with a waiver of responsibility).
They only had to demonstrate through self-conducted (non-independent) studies whether at least 50% of the vaccinated people do not get sick from corona.
They (Pfizer) also undermined further research, because shortly after the vaccine received approval and vaccination began, they also started vaccinating the placebo group.
This placebo group should have remained unvaccinated in order to evaluate further research in the longer term.
In other words, the placebo group was (consciously or unconsciously?) destroyed.
In this way, adverse side effects could no longer be compared with the (destroyed) placebo group.
Meanwhile, politicians and media have started to trumpet that you should get vaccinated, not only to protect yourself, but above all to protect others.
While there was no research that could support this.
People who, for whatever reason, did not get vaccinated were excluded from social life, demonized, labeled as antisocial and selfish.
In short, the worst government and media polarization I've seen in my life.
It is an outright scandal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Something to think about?
Are we still allowed to think for ourselves from our dictatorial governments?
I also heard a lot of "assumptions" in this talk.
Which isn't really scientific.
Moreover, I find it shocking that there is propaganda that lockdowns and the like would work and that those measures are justified time and again.
There is not yet a single scientific study that has shown that these measures help or have helped.
If it were the case, while we are talking about the States, then the states in the US, which applied very strict dictatorial measures, would be easy to pick out.
But what do we see?
States with strict measures often do worse than states where absurd measures were treated less strictly.
Herd immunity has helped humanity over and over again from such epidemics as this one.
Why should it be any different now?
In addition, "real" scientists have long known that developing vaccines against respiratory viruses is a hopeless task because of the numerous mutations.
The flu vaccine is a good example of this.
It is estimated that it only protects about 15% against the upcoming flu mutant, for which there is no vaccine yet.
They inject you with a cocktail of earlier known variants, in the hope that it could work more or less for the upcoming variant.
Which is sometimes very disappointing.
These flu vaccines are very effective to pay for your doctor's skiing holiday.
Apparently people stubbornly refuse to learn from history and prefer to disrupt the entire society and economy, with a colossal cost as a result, which the next and younger generation will be stuck with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@noelcayer3599
When they give you a flu shot, you get a cocktail of three to four vaccines, one of which they hope will work against the variant to come.
That did not work very well in 2018.
A variant surfaced to which the cocktail did not responded well.
Vaccinated, well, supposedly vaccinated people got the flu anyway, and many died.
Almost as many died as of corona now.
Also with overcrowded ICs like now.
But no drama was woven around.
Strange, isn't it?
The point remains: It has never been possible to market a vaccine that causes no side effects in certain people.
Some with permanent lifelong injuries, such as the swine flu vaccine in 2009, which led to narcolepsy in some, including small children.
The time span in which that corona vaccine was developed is far too short.
Certainly those vaccines based on that new mRNA type that has never been used in humans.
So I stick to my point: The mutational properties of these viruses is the main reason why vaccine manufacturers never attempted to develop a vaccine for them.
Because the development of a valid vaccine takes about 5 to 20 years to study its long-term effects.
Something that has not happened here and that can't be done with these mutating viruses.
Hence the 2009 debacle with the swine flu vaccine.
A very risky business, which made me decide not to get vaccinated.
Incidentally, unnecessary because I was already naturally infected with the corona virus in May last year and survived it with ease at the age of 66.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Fergus-H-MacLeod
For proper functioning of the immune system, the recommended dose by the health authorities is way too low.
It may prevent rickets, but to boost the immune system and thus protect yourself against infections, these amounts are completely insufficient.
I take 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily and 5,000 IU in the summer.
Vitamin K2mk7 200 µg daily
Zinc 20 mg daily
Vitamin B12 1,000 µg daily, because older people like me absorb less of it from food.
I also take magnesium regularly.
Not only do cold symptoms stay away, but also my bowel function works much better now, no more constipation.
This is not insignificant, since poor digestion can be the cause of many ailments and can also affect other organs, liver, kidneys, etc.
I feel really good and the only thing I regret is that I didn't start sooner.
Because I used to suffer from long-lasting colds, especially in winter.
I don't take vitamin C because I eat enough fresh fruit and vegetables.
I may have been infected a few times during all that time, but if there are no symptoms, it goes unnoticed, doesn't it?
1
-
@Toooldforthisshite
That frustrated me too, but he always based himself on the official data.
Data that now appears to be questionable, to say the least.
And, how many so-called medical professionals have not done so?
Who, like John, also supported government measures, lockdowns, mouth masks, you name it?
We are now almost two years after the start of these ′′ so called ′′ vaccines and a lot has already come out..
Personally, I think what the governments have done is much worse.
It is now gradually becoming clear to everyone that the "experiment" has gone seriously wrong.
Even today, governments refuse to face this reality and, along with the complicit media, remain silent about this debacle.
The governments and the media are the main culprits and certainly also the media platforms that censored the dissenting voice.
John still has to weigh his words because of possible censorship on this platform.
I'm not even talking about the government's polarization of vaccinated against unvaccinated people, which has broken even years of friendships between people.
Unimaginable.
If you would have stated in 2019 that this was going to happen, you would have been declared crazy.
1
-
1
-
@smittykoi
Well, I also had it often after the flu too.
The symptoms were gone after a few days, but I still felt weak for a long time afterwards.
After all, your body is going through an ordeal, which usually causes you to lose a few pounds as well.
This applies to any serious illness and should certainly not be underestimated.
It is also the reason why weakened elderly people often die from the flu.
Strange only that everyone seems to consider "that" as normal, but not as far as covid is concerned.
Those who talk about "long covid" should know that "long influenza" also exists, so it is nothing new.
Besides, for the people who favor this (experimental) vaccine, well, the vaccine is supposed to trigger the immune system.
It is not the (so-called) vaccine, (if it works at all), but ultimately the immune system that does the job.
That is why also "they" have an interest in a well-functioning immune system.
1
-
1
-
@grammarofficerkrupke4398
Ivermectin is safer than Aspirin, if the prescribed dose is not exceeded.
Virtually no side effects have been reported in the years that the drug has been on the market.
I think the vaccines that have been hastily thrown on the market have already caused more and more severe side effects and permanent damage than Ivermectin.
It can be checked on VAERS.
Indeed, Ivermectin is most effective when administered at the first covid symptoms.
So, before one ends up seriously ill in the hospital.
There was a study that was actually done completely wrong.
It was a clinical trial, in other words, people who were already so sick that they were in the hospital.
One group was given Ivermectin at a dose that exceeded four times the maximum prescribed dose.
Which in itself is asking for trouble, and besides, the treatment started too late.
The patients were already in an advanced stage.
Another group received nothing or a placebo, so no harmful dose.
This study apparently aimed to discredit Ivermectin.
Hydroxychloroquine was not allowed to be prescribed off-label in some countries against deadly covic-19, but it may be prescribed off-label to relieve (non-lethal) pain in rheumatism patients.
Incomprehensible.
As for virologists, well, as we've seen for a year and a half now, they've already missed the mark on more than one occasion.
I tend to believe people who work in the field and get results.
I would rather call them epidemiologists, rather than virologists, who seem to live in a (lab) bubble.
1
-
1
-
@barryschwarz
I was also surprised by the openness of Minister Franck Vandenbroucke about the figures.
I don't know when or how, but he may have revealed the numbers during a live broadcast and it apparently went viral on Facebook and Twitter.
I don't know, because I don't have a Facebook nor Twitter account, but I did see the video here on YouTube.
Apparently they couldn't get the shit back in the horse.
But the media usually lies by omission.
A propaganda trick from the box of tricks that was also frequently used by the Nazis.
It is clear that the media has become the mouthpiece of the government since the government caused this crisis.
The media (press) that normally has to control the government and be critical, is anything but.
For example, I have never heard from the media that the vaccines are still in the experimental stage phase 3.
Essential to inform people that they are participating in an experiment.
According to the Nuremberg Code, it is illegal to perform experimental treatments on people without their explicit consent.
The media is complicit in covering up this information.
I don't know where you get that 1 out of 9 in your frantic efforts to justify the numbers.
97% would be the protection against hospitalization.
That would mean that virtually no vaccinated people should be in hospital
The population is not 100% vaccinated.
But even with an 80% vaccination rate, hospitals would not be able to fill up.
But if we are to believe the fear mongering of the government through their mouthpiece, the media, it is due to unvaccinated people.
While they only represent 30% of the hospitalized.
So, you're still missing the point.
With an effectiveness of 97%, the number of vaccinated hospitalized should be close to zero.
The full hospitals (if that is to be believed) are only 30% filled with unvaccinated covid patients.
So it is a blatant (media) lie that the unvaccinated are responsible for those "full" hospitals.
You're trying to convince me otherwise, but the fact that they (the government) are talking about a third jab speaks volumes, doesn't it?
The effectiveness of the vaccines is not what they have been telling us and certainly not what the vaccine manufacturers have claimed.
But they got a waiver of liability anyway, so who cares.
In the meantime, the governments (with our tax money) are buying even more of those vaccines and the cash registers of the pharmaceutical companies keep ringing.
Less than a year of vaccinations, three shots and up to the fourth jab.
Where will this madness end?
1
-
@jerrycann9072
Maybe because Germany is a neighbor and Hottentots, Boedisten, ect. are far away, as far as I'm concerned.
Also because my parents and grandparents suffered under the Nazi occupation, fortunately I wasn't born yet.
But intolerance now goes very far, doesn't it.
Even if I give an example, it is no longer possible for me to choose the "example" myself.
I think stigmatizing people is wrong, just as you see today that people are stigmatized as "white supremasists" because they are white.
This is one of the worst forms of racism, because the people who do this use the race card for political ends.
Yet you don't hear anything else these days.
Disgusting.
Now, back on topic, depriving people of (human) rights because they are not vaccinated and granting those rights to people with a vaccination card, is discrimination and stigmatization, discrimination first class, it is completely wrong and completely against human rights .
Yet there are people who defend this.
It indicates how badly one has slipped into this fear psychosis.
As Professor Matias Desmet said, "People in anxiety psychosis can be coaxed into anything and are capable of anything."
"Their gaze is so narrowed that they only see the fear object."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOLhF9fyjkk&t=1937s&ab_channel=DeNieuweWereld
1
-
@jerrycann9072
You asked me why "you people", with which you placed me in a group, of which I cannot see in your brain who you actually mean by this group "you people".
Nevertheless, I tried to give you an honest answer, given that indeed my parents and grandparents suffered under the occupation of the Nazis and it were the Nazis who stigmatized the Jews.
I also know this from the stories my grandparents and parents have told me.
I cannot say more than what actually happened.
I can't reverse or rewrite history as some try to do.
When you ask a question, it implies you're waiting for an answer, doesn't it?
If you don't like that answer, well, that's your problem.
But yes, maybe I should not have answered your nonsensical question: "why you people".
Quote: "Doesn't work."
Apparently it works, judging by your reaction.
So I will stick to my example to use the Nazis as an example and will also stick to the rest of my speech, whether you like it or not, I don't care, that is your problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SkenonSLive
On billions of people, without their consent, because they are ignorant that these vaccines are still in the Phase 3 experimental stage until at least the end of 2023.
Developing a safe vaccine takes about 7 to 12 years, in order to also study its long-term effects.
Something that couldn't possibly have happened with these vaccines, which were launched on the market in a matter of months.
These vaccine manufacturers were exempted from responsibility by the "governments" when things go wrong.
If adverse effects should appear in the longer term, you are completely on your own.
You unknowingly participated in a medical experiment, which was also pushed by your own government and pushed down your throat.
Or rather, stabbed in your arm.
The government also shrugged off responsibility for the narcolepsy cases that emerged after the swine flu vaccinations.
They claimed it had not been shown to be due to the vaccinations.
Yet the government in the Netherlands stopped vaccinating and millions of vaccines were burned.
Since these mRNA vaccines are being applied to humans for the first time, some caution would not have been misplaced before mass vaccination was started.
Especially when you know that application to animals with this mRNA technique did not go well.
Phase 3 until at least the end of 2023 and then phase 4 of the experimental stage will start.
When does it end?
Well, you tell me.
Hopefully there will be no long-term effects such as leukemia or autoimmune diseases.
I don't wish anyone bad luck, but I don't let my body be messed with.
My body is too dear to me, I only have one and take good care of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The MEDIA works with:
Two measures two weights?
Two arguments contrary to each other?
Or what should you call such a thing?
Bias?
Partiality?
Hypocrisy?
Propaganda is bringing information that fits your booth and what does not fit in your booth is concealed.
When elderly people die, so to speak, "BY" corona, the fact that these people often already have serious life-threatening conditions is constantly being dismissed, hushed up, not mentioned, etc.
No, no, these people definitely died "BY" corona and nothing else.
But look now!
Some elderly people already died after receiving the vaccine.
Some a few hours after receiving the syringe.
Now suddenly "YES" the excuse is being used that these people were ALREADY sick AND definitely did NOT die from the vaccine, BUT because of their life-threatening illness they already had.
Well well well.
I don't know if the mainstream media is paying attention to it and keeping a counter of the number of vaccination deaths, as they do for the number of (so-called) corona deaths.
No, oh no, because these people didn't die from the vaccine, no, no, no.
NOT a counter, because they died from their life-threatening illness and NOT from the vaccine.
Something that is not the case with corona, isn't it MEDIA?
However, there are news channels that do publicize those cases.
https://youtu.be/ErGQumwmZiA?t=468
1
-
Is ventilation rubbish?
Research has indeed been done by, for example, an analyst in the Netherlands, named Maurice de Hond.
He couldn't understand that in a short time hundreds of people could suddenly become infected, the so-called mass infections.
This could not be done outside just by contact with one or two infected people.
Mass infections that happened in the south of the Netherlands at the very beginning of the corona epidemic, during the carnival that is celebrated there.
The mass contamination in Ischgl, Austria also caught his attention.
He analyzed the cases and quickly came to the conclusion that the infections had not happened outside on the street or on the ski slope, but inside the halls where the after parties or apres skies were held.
In those closed spaces, the air must have been contaminated by one or two people, as a result of which everyone who stayed in this space for a few hours was infected by inhaling the contaminated air.
In other words, they were breathing the virus in large quantities directly into their lungs, the most vulnerable place to covid19.
Not their hands, lips, nose or eyes, no, directly in the lungs.
In Ischgl even the man behind the bar (bartender) was infected.
Breathing in contaminated air, due to lack of ventilation, also happens in nursing homes and yes, even in hospitals.
The people (elderly) who sit in these retirement homes breathe in the same air almost 24/7, which may possibly be contaminated.
This is also one of the reasons that older people living at home are less at risk than older people in nursing homes.
So I wouldn't underestimate ventilation.
I myself (66) was infected with covid19 by a person (49) with whom I worked, who was in turn infected by his father-in-law (82) who lived alone but had contracted the infection in hospital, where he was admitted (corona free) for about 10 days for treatment unrelated to corona.
We have all survived the infection, even the seriously ill old man (82) who was quarantined with his daughter and son-in-law because they stayed in his house to assist the man in recovering from his illness, which had nothing to do with corona.
The infection was diagnosed at the old man's home about a week after his discharge from the hospital.
The people from the hospital spontaneously came to his home to perform the test.
It has never been admitted in so many words, but apparently something wasn't kosher in the hospital.
Maurice de Hond who is a good analyst, contacted (for help) virologists and epidemiologists worldwide, they confirmed his analysis that indeed with respiratory viruses, such as influenza, corona, etc., the infection can certainly happen through the air.
For example, a lot of people who are together in a very poorly ventilated room for a long time can become seriously infected (directly in the lungs) by inhalation.
I mention Maurice de Hond, but he is certainly not the only one who has studied this.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marioenc04
I don't have a thesis on the sinovac vaccine at all.
I don't know where you get that from.
It is well known that the development of vaccines takes years, at least 5 to sometimes 20 years, to investigate all long-term effects.
I don't have to search for or give up sources for that.
This is well known and scientifically not disputed.
So, I don't know what you mean.
But if vaccines take years to be considered safe, then you don't have to be a genius to know and realize that these hastily marketed vaccines are not without risk.
The narcolepsy cases in 2009 showed that.
The Dutch government in 2009 stopped vaccinating and burned any remaining vaccines, but said there was no link to the narcolepsy cases.
Nevertheless, the government has paid compensation to certain persons.
This information is easy to find online, although some information is in Dutch.
Moreover, I have already followed many conversations with Dutch doctors, which will be of no use to you if you do not understand the language.
But many of these doctors say they would not take the vaccination, from these hastily developed vaccines.
They argue that the severity of the disease, with an IFR of only 0.23, does not outweigh the risks of the vaccination.
This is of course completely different with serious diseases, such as polio, smallpox or tetanus.
Let me put it this way, I was infected by the corona virus in May last year.
Despite my advanced age, 66, I had a chance.
I did have a mild fever, sore throat, cough and the worst of it was an unexplained fatigue that I had never experienced before.
We are now almost a year later and look, I'm still alive.
My father had a brother, my uncle.
Which I never knew, because he died of tetanus in 1939 at the age of eleven.
The boy had no chance at all.
The doctor said to my grandmother: "you know what pain is, you have already given birth to children, but the pain this boy is going through is beyond description".
With tetanus, every muscle in your body cramps, until eventually your heart muscle cramps and death puts you out of your misery.
Now, if you think I'm an anti-vacser, you're wrong.
I've been vaccinated against polio, smallpox and of course also tetanus, but not measles.
When I was a child, in the 1950s, that was not yet common and we just got all the childhood diseases that made us immune for the rest of our lives.
I respect Dr John Campbell, but the claim that vaccines will eradicate this virus is inconsistent with Professor Dr. Theo Schetters, who works in South Africa and also has several patents for vaccines on animals to his name.
According to Dr. Theo Schetters, even if one had to succeed in getting rid of this corona virus completely in humans, then the virus will continue to live on in the animal world among wild animals, including mustelids, and will reappear again and again under one or another variant .
In other words, we will have to learn to live with it.
Something that does not seem to have penetrated the authorities yet.
As Christine P described it earlier:
"These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, they've not been licensed, they received emergency use authorization only, and the manufacturerers have been indemnified from liability."
I couldn't have said it better.
1
-
@gavinparks5386
Well, the person who infected me is younger than me, but he was infected by his 82-year-old father-in-law, who survived the infection.
Spicy detail: the father-in-law 82 contracted the infection in the hospital while he was there for an unrelated treatment.
So, the hospital is the place to be.
One more detail, none of my relatives, grandparents, parents, aunts or uncles ever turned 80.
The oldest was my maternal grandfather, who had the blessed age of 76 when he passed away in 1964.
So, what are we actually talking about?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rmakids
Well, I was infected with corona in May last year at the age of 66, survived and came out a stronger person, like I did after every viral or bacterial infection in my life.
When I was eight, which must have been in '62, I was infected with a bacterial intestinal infection, which gave me a fever of 41.1 ° C.
Almost deadly.
I was taken from the boarding school I was, in to the hospital, treated with antibiotics and quarantined in my hospital room.
That's how it went, the sick person was quarantined, not the healthy one.
Even the boarding school where I attended was not quarantined.
Now you get the absurd situation that healthy people are locked up, are not allowed to have contact with each other, the economy is going to collapse and the number of infections continues.
Judging from your response, the scare tactic and fear psychosis you are in, and which is fueled by media complicity, has clearly got you well.
Lock yourself in a forest, far from the people, no contact with people, sick or healthy, and hope that you don't catch a disease from some wild animal, if that makes you happy.
But after, say, 40 years, you will be a weakling, who will take the brunt of it at the slightest contamination, because you will be left with a weakened immune system that is not up to date and will abandon you completely and not be able to protect you.
Try to get out of your tunnel vision and turn your focus away from the fear object you are fixating on.
Maybe then, with a little good will of yourself, you will see that this whole vaccine situation is an outright experiment.
Remember that the lockdown is a political decision that has nothing to do with medical science.
I never went along with that fear story.
From the moment the lockdown was imposed, in my country on Friday, March 13, 2020, I knew they had gone mad.
I haven't been in it for a day.
I stayed sober all the time, even when I became infected myself.
And I'm still sober, while I watch the madness around me with open mouth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@j.scottlaprise6063
Finally someone with meaningful comments.
Still, I disagree with your conclusion.
You indicate that the long-term effects cannot be predicted.
However, suppose, only a hypothesis, that the vaccine triggers leukemia in, for example, 5% of the now vaccinated people within five years.
It would be an unprecedented catastrophe, even if the number were only 5%.
So what is happening now (my personal opinion) is actually playing Russian roulette with a large part of the population.
But that aside.
There is the disproportionate anxiety psychosis that has been/is being created around this coronavirus.
Now, for example, it is the new variants that add to and prolong the fear.
Is this really necessary?
Is it justified that the WHO placed the virus in category A, together with Ebola, for example?
According to that doomsday scenario, 3 to 4% of people would die from this virus, while if you take the current figures from the WHO and make the calculation, you get an IFR of 0.23%.
So it was based on a blatant lie.
But that was not the only lie, it was also said "It is a completely new virus that no people have any resistance against".
A second blatant lie.
It's all pretty clear to me.
Well, not all, I wonder is the WHY of all this, that is still not clear to me.
You cite the flu example yourself.
As a physician you will know that every autumn a flu shot is offered to those interested, this shot is a cocktail of 3 to 4 at that time "KNOWN" variants.
The variant that will emerge in the coming winter is usually "UNKNOWN".
But it is hoped for that this cocktail will form some defense against the coming variant.
Sometimes, however, things can go badly and the flu shot does not seem to provide the expected protection at all, as it happened in 2018.
When the hospitals were also overloaded and there were a large number of deaths, even people who had had the flu shot.
I respect medical science.
When you see the progress that has been made in, say, the last 200 years, it is enormous.
I will not say that medical science is "TOTALLY" powerless against these respiratory viruses, but for now, as they say in my language here it is, "Mop the floor with the tap open".
It may be clear that I am not in the anxiety psychosis caused by the WHO, the politicians and (especially) the media.
I will not let my brain be tainted by media propaganda.
When I watch or listen to the media, all I see is how they spin the story in a propagandistic way.
So I can think freely and openly, without fear psychosis.
But being able to express my opinion openly (a human right after all) that is something else.
You should see the list of swear words I've already gotten over me from mainly scared people.
Sad.
As a physician, you will (perhaps?) Be interested in what this man has to say:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWrZxCx6L6g&t=1229s&ab_channel=BLCKBX
English subtitles can be requested via the settings of the video.
He was immediately cracked after this broadcast by the mainstream media, who could not appreciate his opinion, because of course it does not support their fear-mongering.
He then came up with another broadcast, for which there are currently no English subtitles, in which he maintains his position and says that more attention should be paid to the risk groups.
1
-
@j.scottlaprise6063
Usually I try to sort of prepare my answer since English is not my native language, but now I don't know where to start. LOL.
I base my reasoning and (personal) judgment, partly on data and other information, but also on my own (life) experience.
I will be 67 in a few months and once got the comment here in the YouTube comments from someone, that boomers have no life experience.
Anyway, first some observations.
The average age (death rates) of this virus would (according to the data), depending on country, be around 80 years.
Let this be the average life expectancy in our regions (Western Europe).
Someone recently said to me in a comment here that in the 80 year old age bracket you would have an IFR of 10%.
I don't know what that man relied on, nor have I disputed it, since I know that most of the victims are elderly.
But, if I look in my family (relatives), aunts, uncles, parents and grandparents, none of them have turned 80.
The oldest was my maternal grandfather, who passed away in 1964 at the age of 76.
Not that I don't want to turn 80, but then I have to wait and see.
Cancer played a big role.
My mother turned 56 and died of ovarian cancer.
Her brother, my uncle, turned 42 and died of colon cancer.
On my father's side, my grandmother turned 54 and died of a malfunctioning heart valve, which they might be able to replace now, but it happened in 1961 and then they couldn't help her.
My father's brother, an uncle (whom I never knew) died of tetanus in 1939 at the age of eleven.
My father died of throat cancer at the age of 72.
To which I add that for the last ten years of his life he was a wreck, he could no longer speak (aphasia), caused by a brain thrombosis.
He had also had a lung thrombosis, all complications he got after heart surgery (bypass).
My father was a drinker and heavy smoker, so he eventually died, not of the ailments he had suffered from for over ten years, but of a carcinoma of the throat, which appears to be typical of the combination of smoking and alcohol.
So he probably owes it to himself.
Why am I providing all this personal information?
To give you an idea, because of course it strongly influences how I view the subject of health and death.
I am not an anti-vaxxer at all and have been vaccinated against smallpox, polio and tetanus.
But, as you say, a human (individual) makes a risk assessment.
Of course, the IFR is very important, but also how great the risk is of contracting the disease.
Someone who works with horses a lot is more likely to get tetanus compared to someone who does desk work, does not do dirty and heavy work and rarely has injuries.
My personal (life) experiences certainly influence my judgment.
A very important point I have learned in my life is that fear is a "very" bad advisor.
In fear you sometimes make the most irrational, wrong and fatal irreversible decisions with far-reaching consequences.
I therefore guard myself against fear and will certainly not get carried away in a fear psychosis and certainly not if the focus is on one object, which creates a narrowing of the image and you lose all perspective and can no longer see, let alone judge the broader picture.
Now, and this is also because of my personal experiences, I have "no" great regard for politics and politicians.
I don't live in the Netherlands, but in the Netherlands, the government (politicians) has overhauled health care over the last ten to fifteen years and the number of hospital beds is now reduced to only 50% than it used to be, let's say 15 years ago.
As a result, for example, the Netherlands has only 1/4 of the number of hospital beds per inhabitant compared to Germany
So the lack of capacity in case of disaster or epidemic is caused by the austerity policy of the government.
This lack of capacity also manifests itself in a severe flu, such as in 2018, this also made the news, but strangely enough was not dramatized.
What I mean is, the hospital overload is not so much the fault of the virus as of a policy that has not taken all factors into account.
Is healthcare expensive?
Of course.
But is it wise to phase out health care at a time when life expectancy is high and rising, so that you can expect more sick and dependent people?
I think the question answers itself.
1
-
@j.scottlaprise6063
Yes, the information about Israel, Dr. John talked about that too.
Too bad you haven't added a link as far as that study is concerned.
But first of all, the number of cases is declining not only in Israel, but worldwide, even in countries where there is no vaccination or no lockdown
So the virus is clearly on the wane, as the most vulnerable people have already been affected.
As always happens with these types of viruses.
I'd rather follow Professor Dr. Theo Schetters, that it is not necessary, even pointless, to inoculate the entire world population.
This virus cannot be eradicated, according to him.
Even if every human on Earth is vaccinated, the coronavirus will continue to circulate in the animal world, among the wild animal population.
Variants will therefore keep popping up, just as is the case with flu.
Will the whole world be put in lockdown over and over again and the entire world population be vaccinated again, each time such a variant appears?
Or is it not better, just as with the flu, to only protect the risk groups and possibly vaccinate them and leave the rest of the healthy population alone?
Respiratory viruses cannot be compared with, for example, measles.
These respiratory viruses mutate too easily.
It is one of the reasons why the pharmaceutical industry has never turned to vaccines for these types of viruses.
Developing a safe vaccine takes years.
By then the virus has mutated several times.
So it would be mopping with the tap open.
But vaccine manufacturers have now been relieved of responsibility by the governments in case things go wrong, and the governments have taken the responsibility. (That's we, the taxpayer).
But is it justified that the government plays Russian roulette with its population?
Of course, the pharmaceutical companies agree to annually vaccinate the entire world population with exemption from responsibility.
How would you react if you were a vaccine manufacturer?
In your previous passage you also talked about data.
Well, data is very useful for drawing conclusions, if the data is RELIABLE.
The doctors in Bakersfield, California, who received constant visits from journalists, held a press conference that also featured a TV station.
They talked about their experiences and also that the government had put pressure on them to list covid as the cause of death on death certificates as much as possible.
Why does the government do such a thing?
What is the importance?
I personally met someone in May/June last year, I don't remember the exact date, who works in a retirement home for the elderly.
I asked him, out of curiosity if they had not had too many problems due to corona.
He replied, "No, we didn't have any infection in our home yet, but every elder who has died since mid-March was given covid as the cause of death on the death certificate."
That is shocking data manipulation.
That's why I have a hard time, with all due respect, when Dr. John is drawing conclusions based on DATA.
Then I grind my teeth a lot.
I don't feel called to get vaccinated, especially because I was already infected with the virus and actually got the REAL stuff.
I (66) contracted it from a friend (48) with whom I had done some odd jobs.
He contracted the virus from his father-in-law (82), who contracted the virus in hospital when he was admitted for several weeks for non-covid related problems.
The man's general health was so weak (not due to corona) that they did not want/dared to operate him for a TURP operation (prostate) and they sent him home with a bladder probe.
At home, about a week later, he was diagnosed with corona, which he had most likely contracted in the hospital, because it was hospital staff who unexpectedly dropped into his home to do the test.
This says enough.
Despite the man being weak and 82, he survived the corona infection, his 48-year-old son-in-law and also I survived the infection.
To date I don't know anyone in my circle of acquaintances who has died of corona.
Recently my brother's daughter and her husband also became infected with corona.
They both had the same flu-like symptoms as I've had and recovered after a few days.
Their two small children did not develop any symptoms.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@j.scottlaprise6063
Quote: "Do you believe the hospitals are full of coronovirus patients?" (sic).
I have already spoken to several people who work in a hospital.
They all say the same thing: "There are corona patients in our hospital, but the numbers are not too bad.
The media is very good at whipping up and dramatizing.
On the other hand, they are also good at withholding and concealing information.
For example, during the supposedly first corona wave in the spring of 2020, a TV station here in my country showed footage of a mass grave in New York that they had dug over there because they could no longer handle the influx of corona deaths (so to speak).
They showed images of a huge pit and a crane to dig that pit.
However, there were viewers who had a déjà vu.
They had seen those images before.
What turned out?
The images came from a report a few years earlier about homeless people in New York, long before the corona outbreak.
It turned out to be a mass grave in New York, however, not for corona victims, but it was a grave where New York City buries unidentified homeless people.
The TV station later apologized, after the large number of complaints they had received from viewers about these malpractices.
I no longer follow the news media and, incidentally, watch very little TV.
I do listen to a lot of radio, for the music, but when there is a news bulletin, I often cannot ignore it, or I have to switch off the radio.
I can hear it, but I only hear how they spin the news and I take the content with a fairly large pinch of salt.
1
-
@j.scottlaprise6063
For me it is not a discussion, it is my opinion.
You moderated your statement in "work with your government", previously you said "fight your government".
You know, for that word "fight" and the phrase "for your rights and walk peacelfully to the congress to let your voice heard", they wanted to impeach Trump.
Dangerous to use the word "fight" in these crazy times.
Yes I may be talking about things outside of the vaccine, but it's all related.
The lockdown over WHO lies-induced panic would last only a few weeks.
Why do you think we're still dealing with that nonsense a year later?
Because the governments have reached an agreement with the vaccine manufacturers.
The anxiety psychosis had to be kept going.
The vaccine manufacturers were relieved of responsibility and meanwhile the economy was ruined.
"Work with my government?"
As if they listen to an ordinary citizen like me.
Never do I forgive the government for preventing me from practicing my profession a whole year and perhaps longer, NEVER.
A government is expected to serve the population and not to imprison (innocent) people.
I'm not saying you make those dictatorial decisions.
I just said, "You know these are dictatorial decisions?"
But from all your explanations, you seemed like a big supporter of those experimental vaccines and forced vaccination.
You even recommended that I get vaccinated.
So?
For the record, I'll try to make it clear again
I'm not an antivaxer, as the media these days insults people who don't want this experimental vaccine.
I have been vaccinated against smallpox, polio and tetanus, serious illnesses.
Safe vaccines, which have taken years to study their long-term effects.
Now you can spin and explain it as you want, but you cannot study long-term effects in a period of a few months.
As far as traveling is concerned.
After all I've been through in the past year, nothing surprises me anymore.
The government, acting like dictatorial rulers, is capable of anything.
They have now noticed how far they can go with us and apparently they have a taste for it.
A good advice to think about this fear psychosis is to listen to what the Belgian psychology professor Matias Desmet has to say about it.
Well, listen?
It's in Dutch, but English subtitles are available through the video's settings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOLhF9fyjkk&t=2793s
Good luck.
1
-
@j.scottlaprise6063
Well, you don't have to apologize.
Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion.
And I respect your opinion and point of view.
Besides, I know the language problem.
My mother tongue is not English either.
So I also have to translate and pay attention to how I formulate my sentences.
It is not always easy
Anyway, the lingua franca on the internet is English.
I have to say that I appreciate Dr. John's explanation when it comes to medical matters, but I have a very hard time with his political views on the strict measures.
He looks at it from a medical point of view, but society must be able to function, or we are doomed.
It's tunnel vision.
If we are going to lock up and punish everyone for every disease that comes up, where are we going to end up?
Life comes with risks.
Countless people die in traffic every year, yet we do not stop traffic.
We accept that risk.
Our ancestors were much more at risk for disease than we are, yet their society continued to run.
Now we have a madness that wants to rule out any risk.
People have gone so mad that they think they can control everything, that they have some kind of divine power.
But that's haughty.
If later, in 10, 20, or 30 years, they start looking back on this whole episode, I'm sure they'll label it as madness.
1
-
@madedjrbatara1000
Quote: "But covid19 is a novel virus meaning almost 100% are not immune."
Total nonsense spread by WHO that put covid19 in Category A along with Ebola.
But nothing turned out to be further from the truth.
The WHO now indicates that for covid19 there is an IFR of 0.23%.
Which is in line with a serious flu.
Yet everyone has ended up in a fear psychosis and tunnel vision, disrupting the whole society and economy, so that the consequences will be many times worse in the coming years than the disease itself.
By the way, I am not worried, I was infected with the virus last May, at the age of 66 and must say that I have had much more serious symptoms from flu in my life, than this time from corona.
The person who infected me has also been ill and has recovered.
But his wife who took care of her corona-infected father and had to stay in quanrantaine with her corona-infected husband in that father's house, woman who also shared the bed with her infected husband, has not been ill at all and has had no symptoms.
My brother's daughter was also infected with the virus along with her husband.
They had pretty much the same symptoms as I have had, but their two children have not been ill at all.
So forget that fairy tale of "novel virus" and "100% 'NOT' immune".
Reality, meanwhile, has blatantly shown that the "truth" is quite different from the media and government propaganda.
If you are still walking around with that thought that was talked to us by the fear mongers, then you are really stuck in your tunnel vision.
I already know several people who have been infected with covid19, including myself.
But to date I don't know anyone in my circle of acquaintances who has died of it.
But, perhaps my circle of acquaintances is very small, that could also be an explanation. LOL.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thumbs up on this medical topic.
Much more interesting than the political positions on harsh measures, etc. that disrupt our society.
At the same time, the government is being exposed.
If they were really concerned about the corona epidemic and its victims, this drug should have been recommended months ago.
One of the safest drugs on the market and very effective.
Incomprehensible.
But then again not.
We by now know very well the government and media propaganda, lockdown, social distancing, curfew, mouth masks, closed businesses and VACCIN, VACCIN, VACCIN.
Appalling, abominable, disgusting, dictatorial, totalitarian and irresponsible policies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@metalpuppet5798 Yeah, the vaccines work 95%, don't they?
Do not make me laugh.
That's why so many people get infected and sick even after their fourth injection, including Biden and Fauci, etc.
That they get less sick is a fairy tale that we (ordinary citizens) cannot verify.
Besides, a vaccine is supposed to protect you from getting sick and if it doesn't even after "four" shots, you can't call that "a" vaccine, but crap with the only effect being side effects like myocarditis, etc.
The fear mongering that is being pushed down our throats by the governments and the (bribed) mainstream media is shocking.
It is psychological manipulation.
If you scare the population enough, you can manipulate them and move them into anything.
The same tricks that have been used by religions for centuries.
So nothing new under the sun.
It is dogmatically carrying out an agenda that has absolutely nothing to do with science.
That there are still people who don't see through that and still go along with that absurd narrative is shocking and at the same time pathetic naive.
P.S. that after 2.5 years of fundamental rights-violating measures and pushing and administering experimental stuff, there has still been no evaluation of the adverse effects of these measures and injections, should actually ring a bell with everyone.
But they will scrupulously avoid that, because that will ruin their entire applied strategy and they will have to justify themselves.
1