Comments by "" (@rvdb8876) on "WCPO 9" channel.

dude Fraudsters are protected by a legal system that stipulates that you must be able to prove the culprit's guilt beyond any doubt. Which is of course very difficult, and which almost gives them carte blanche to do their thing. But what happened here is that she was stupid enough to (indisputably) admit herself that she had committed fraud.
2
@shroud1390 Most of the judges were so cowardly, (their position, you know?), that they dismissed most cases without looking at it. In other words, they didn't even check if there was enough evidence. They just turned it down on ridiculous grounds, such as "Submitted too late" and "Mistrust of the mail ballot system, should have been addressed before the election and not after" etc., etc. Procedure arguments that have nothing to do with the current fraud. Many judges didn't want to burn their fingers. They prefer to keep the cesspool closed. Fraudsters are protected by a legal system that stipulates that you must be able to prove the culprit's guilt beyond any doubt. Which is of course very difficult, and which almost gives them carte blanche to do their thing. But what happened here is that she was stupid enough to (indisputably) admit herself that she had committed fraud.
2
@SOS-fy6qi Oh, no, all the tricks from the box of tricks were used. But the fraudsters are protected by a legal system that stipulates that you must be able to prove the culprit's guilt beyond any doubt. Which is of course very difficult, and which almost gives them carte blanche to do their thing. But what happened here is that she was stupid enough to (indisputably) admit herself that she had committed fraud.
1