Comments by "T Brown" (@tbrown3356) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

  1.  @HaHa-gg9dl  Do you believe that planes flying nose tilted slightly up proves mass is warping space time? I'm not following your logic. Planes are denser than air, so of course they have to fight against going down. The real question you should be asking is how do planes fly in a straight path and never have to reorientate it's position in relation to the claimed curvature of the Earth. After traveling a long distance the plane would eventually be vertical in relation to the earth. Use your brain and think about it.
    2
  2.  @HaHa-gg9dl  Watch the video as it gives you a visual, because you may not be able to perceive how flying straight paths doors not work on a globe. Even if constantly reducing altitude, the plane will eventually be in a vertical position in relation to a spherical earth. This does not happen, because the earth is flat and the ground is not reorientating itself into a sphere (curving away). The direction of down remain the same throughout the flight which allows for planes to fly straight paths. https://youtu.be/jDHls64L-YE
    2
  3. @Tinja Nurtle A sphere is curving. A flight from Charlotte NC to Los Angeles California is about 2,400 miles. That would be around 705 miles of curvature. The plane would not be able to fly straight. But it does fly straight. And down is always the same direction. This is not that difficult to grasp.
    2
  4.  Tinja Nurtle  Looks like a straight path to me. Flew level the whole way. Also didn't have to worry about earth rotating underneath. Watch below. https://youtu.be/7g0xL88ebXs
    2
  5.  Tinja Nurtle  Here's another straight level flight. https://youtu.be/NNLwc7pHyGc
    2
  6. @Tinja Nurtle One more, so you get the point. https://youtu.be/GP8TaY4rgPw
    2
  7. @Tinja Nurtle Feel free to post the videos of the planes following the curved earth, using those controls to not whizz off in perfectly straight lines. 😂😂😂😂😂
    2
  8.  @trekkeruss  Using a map that is a projection from a globe. The map is not the terrain. You can clearly see planes fly straight level paths. Don't be deceived by models or maps. That's a reification fallacy.
    2
  9. @Tinja Nurtle Not sure what your last comment means. Planes fly straight paths. Not following any curve that would be there. The earth in your model has a radius, so we can calculate where it should be curving. It just isn't.
    2
  10.  @trekkeruss  That's a reification fallacy also. Models are not reality. I'm not claiming a flat Earth model. So don't straw man argument and try to assign a model to me. The flat Earth model you are referring to is fine if it helps you visualize how things can work differently, but again don't confuse the map with the terrain. We don't live on any models or maps.
    2
  11.  @trekkeruss  I didn't say maps don't work. I said maps are not reality. No map is an accurate representation of the Earth we live on. So if your argument for the globe is based on a map not working out, then you have a poor argument. And we know based on your claimed earth radius where earth must be curving, but it's not. Geometry and observation debunks the globe. But you will ignore this to argue about a map.
    2
  12. @Tinja Nurtle Only in your Heliocentrism religion is everything imperceptible. They condition you to believe that. In reality, you don't perceive earth curvature or rotation because earth is flat and stationary. But keep staying deceived, believing a level straight path flying plane is some how flying over a sphere without ever having to reorientate in relation to the sphere.
    2
  13.  @trekkeruss  It's a silly argument when you are asking me to draw a map for you in a comment section. Your argument was debunked already as it relied on a model and map. Scroll below for your map. It will guide you to the fallacy you are guilty of. "Reification is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity. In other words, it is the error of treating something that is not concrete, such as an idea, as a concrete thing. Wikipedia"
    2
  14.  @trekkeruss  I never claimed flat Earth is an abstract idea. Did you go to MSU (make shite up). Your fellow globehead on this comment thread claimed science was too abstract. Talk with him about that.
    2
  15.  @ushikiii  Learning something from a space program might be your first problem. Listen to what you just said. "They keep falling while rotating around the earth." Maybe say it out loud so you can hear how ridiculous it sounds.
    2
  16.  @trekkeruss  Flat Earth is reality. Maps and models are reifications. Try to keep up.
    2
  17.  @trekkeruss  You walk on the flat earth every day and you don't know what it looks like. Lol. And there are many videos showing planes flying straight level paths. I posted several to the other guy in here. How they do it is by having a flat level plane they are flying above. I know you don't expect me to go looking at flight routes and distances. That's a ridiculous request.
    2
  18.  @ushikiii  Get your money back from that space program. They have confused you.
    2
  19.  @ushikiii  I just looked up Kerbal Space Program. It's a video game. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 "Kerbal Space Program, commonly abbreviated as KSP, is a space flight simulation video game developed and published by Squad for Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux, PlayStation 4, and Xbox One. In the game, players direct a nascent space program, staffed and crewed by green humanoid aliens known as "Kerbals". Wikipedia"
    2
  20.  @HaHa-gg9dl  What? You believe earth isn't curving because of gravity? I'm not following your logic.
    2
  21.  @raywhitson290  HAM radio operators get a government approved frequency and just aim their antennas around believing they are bouncing signals off the moon. This doesn't prove anything. "An amateur radio operator is someone who uses equipment at an amateur radio station to engage in two-way personal communications with other amateur operators on radio frequencies assigned to the amateur radio service."  Wikipedia › wiki › Amateur_radio_... Amateur radio operator - Wikipedia
    2
  22.  @raywhitson290  Great evidence. They wrote down that they can bounce radio waves off the moon. 😂😂😂😂😂
    2
  23.  @raywhitson290  It's a government approved frequency. That was 5 words.
    2
  24.  @raywhitson290  Nobody bounces anything off the Moon. Your argument has been debunked. Let It go. You have no evidence that anyone is bouncing anything off the Moon.
    2
  25.  @raywhitson290  Okay. Not going to keep going back and forth with you. Keep moon bouncing buddy. Just make sure it's on one of those government approved frequencies. Lol.
    2
  26.  @hedgie9823  And I wanted to add something to your question about why they lie about the globe. It's about stealing our real purpose. If we believe we are an accident and nothing more than star dust, then we don't feel like we have a purpose. Then they can give us our purposes and control us. We spend our lives chasing material things doing what they need us to do until we die, never knowing our true purpose.
    2
  27.  @Cornwall1888  Funny that flat is in the definition of level. "lev·el /ˈlevəl/ Learn to pronounce noun 1. a horizontal plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point. adjective 1. having a FLAT and even surface without slopes or bumps." "we had reached level ground"
    2
  28.  @raywhitson290  You seem triggered that I debunked your moon bouncing fantasy. Hey guess what I have a moon rock for sale. It looks a lot like petrified wood and it was found on Earth, but trust me it's from the moon. Lol. Interested in buying?
    2
  29.  @Cornwall1888  Yes there is no need for nose down because the earth is flat. That's the whole point genius. If the earth were a sphere the plane would need to reorientate itself in relation to the curvature of the earth.
    2
  30.  @raywhitson290  So you do want to buy my moon rock? Lol.
    2
  31.  @Cornwall1888  Nice double speak. Lol. You said the plane nose has gone down but earlier you claimed that it's not necessary for the nose to go down. Lol.
    2
  32.  @Cornwall1888  I can't keep up with you. First you say it doesn't need to dip the nose. Then you said it does. Now you are back to it does but not relative to the ground below. WTF? You are a confused man. Lol.
    2
  33.  @Cornwall1888  Double speak. You're holding two different beliefs at the same time. Lol.
    2
  34.  @Cornwall1888  You're not making any sense. Planes can't fly nose up but also be dipping their nose. "Doublespeak is language that deliberately obscures, disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms (e.g. "downsizing" for layoffs and "servicing the target" for bombing), in which case it is primarily meant to make the truth sound more palatable."  https://en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki Doublespeak - Wikipedia
    2
  35.  @Cornwall1888  Imagine. Like you are imagining being on a sphere. Lol. No I'm not going to imagine things with you.
    2
  36. @Big AL 311 The sun's apparent position (not actual) in the sky from your perspective APPEARS to drop as it leaves your field of view and goes beyond that line where the sky APPEARS (not actually) to meet the ground. People further west have it coming up over that line where the sky APPEARS (not actually) to meet the ground from their perspective. In reality the sun is always in the sky above you. Maybe observe street lights down a long street. From the side you can see all the lights are the same height. But when looking at them from a front view, the farther away they are from you they start to drop in angular size and the top of the lights appear lower as they get closer to leaving your field of view. That's similarly how the lights in the sky work. It's just perspective buddy. Pay attention to the street lights in the video below and the image. https://youtu.be/VpIdISx1n7w https://images.app.goo.gl/qurTrPQN2BzXUiz46
    2
  37.  @jormungandr9251  You are some kind of special. That's how perspective works. It's the same as looking down a long hallway with a ceiling, walls, and ground. Put a point on the ceiling. If you walk towards the point the object is higher. If you walk away the object drops. If you go back far enough it will dip below your surface. It's how our eyes work. Lol. It's the same with sun sets ( sun departs). Take out all your latitude, longitude, equator, declination crap and this is easy to understand.
    2
  38. You realize that the ice wall is just a theory and not what all flat Earthers believe? It could be endless water or more land beyond the water. Point is we're not on a spinning ball whirling through a vacuum chasing the sun. Lol. So if given the choice of which sounds crazier, a stationary flat plane with an ice wall and NASA and governments hiding it or a spinning ball whirling through a vacuum chasing the sun with everything magically sticking to the ball without people ever feeling or observing any of it, I would say an ice wall with lying governments sounds more logical. Lol.
    2
  39.  @trannkhaiminh9997  Nobody is claiming your high priest Neil is a flat Earther. The claim was he told you that you can't see Earth curvature from 120,000 feet up. That debunks ridiculous claims of people seeing earth curvature from a plane which flys at 30 to 40 thousand feet. So you can stop posting Neil videos. He already debunked you globies.
    2
  40.  @ConnellxSilverfur  Post the hypothesis (independent and dependent variable) for any experiment ever you say proved the globe.
    2
  41. https://youtu.be/F4h9Y5lqn5w
    2
  42. https://youtu.be/RAgbocvJYCA
    1
  43.  @tartaglia420  Here's what gravity is not. It's not a force. https://youtu.be/ZonZ4PshKIY
    1
  44.  @tartaglia420  That's two different things. Einstein gravity states it is not a force. And all of your high priests have known it since 1915. Space time is just a concept. Bending concepts doesn't produce any forces. Which weighs more a box of space or a box of time? Lol.
    1
  45.  @tartaglia420  The lawgiver that created the world where we live has a direction for objects heavier than air to go. Helium balloons are lighter than air so it goes up. But your religion is Heliocentrism and your God is gravity I guess. Unfortunately for you, the laws that govern nature don't care about your religion. So you'll spend your life trying to figure out why heavy things fall down and light things go up, because you want to deny God and his laws.
    1
  46.  @tartaglia420  And yes you are religious. How else could you believe you are on a spinning ball whirling through space chasing the sun in a vacuum and never be able to notice it? That takes a lot of faith. Lol.
    1
  47.  @Bollibompa  Your own high priests don't understand it. Lol. It can't be a force but also not be a force. Lol. https://youtu.be/ZonZ4PshKIY
    1
  48.  @Bollibompa  Listen to another one of your high priests try to explain gravity. Stop pretending like you understand things your high priests can't even explain. https://youtu.be/9XjS4I4oQDY
    1
  49.  @tartaglia420  Let it go buddy. Gravity is not defined as a force anymore. Now go somewhere and imagine you are curving space time. Lol.
    1
  50.  @tartaglia420  We are both religious. And yes, my proof is through observation. Earth is noticeably and observably flat. You can't trust your observations because it is against the tenants of your religion. You must only trust your high priests. Lol.
    1