Comments by "Average Alien" (@AverageAlien) on "'Twas A Bible Accurate Christmas..." video.

  1. Yes, because christianity has ripped off older myths and legends and rewritten them to fit the writers purpose
    11
  2. Yes, like the fact that it was written by bronze age savages that knew nothing about the world, and most of it was stolen from older myths
    4
  3.  @Pharaoh_Tutankhamen  No it's genuinely been ripped off from things like the Epic of Gilgamesh
    4
  4. Allegedly born. If there even was a Jesus.
    4
  5.  @brittanyd8103  You've formed a personal relationship with an imaginary friend inside your head. If faith is required, then it's an automatic confirmation that it's false
    4
  6.  @brittanyd8103  Who believes that aliens exist? I don't see them here. Could you point them out to me? Lol. Tu quoque. Pointing the finger and saying "bUt tHey dO iT tOo!" like a 5 year old child doesn't make your case any stronger. At least we know Aliens are possible, because life is possible, and planets capable of harbouring life are possible. What we don't know, and never will know however, is if magical invisible fairytale beings from some barbaric old books are possible. You can't only not prove the existence of a god, you also can't prove the POSSIBILITY of the existence of a god. And anything that is asserted without evidence, can and will be dismissed without evidence. I should've specified that I was talking about blind faith vs faith based on evidence. I forgot the type of person I was talking to needed that to be pointed out to them of course. I can prove planes exist, and that they are extremely safe and they do their jobs quite well. What I can't do, is assert as a fact something that no man can possibly ever know, e.g. the existence of some magical invisible unprovable being. Even worse than that, you claim to know this beings motives and intentions! Insane levels of narcissism don't ya think?
    4
  7.  @georgesyoutube  yes correct, it's not a science book. But it's also not a history book
    3
  8.  @georgesyoutube  It uses real historical places and characters. Doesn't make it history though. Narnia also uses a real historical setting and location, still fiction
    3
  9.  @dreamwithinadreamfilms  Yes it is miraculous. In other words, a fairytale.
    3
  10.  @brittanyd8103  Of course you threaten to run away if I say anything you deem "offensive." Always need an escape plan I suppose. Not that I care. There is no such thing as an absolute fact in science. Nothing is absolute outside of mathematics. Science is just a method of investigation of the natural world, using evidence and observation to create the best possible descriptions and explanations of what we can test and experiment on. In science, the goal is to try to prove something wrong, until you find out that you can't. You're never trying to prove something right. Fairytales are unfalsifiable. Your god is unfalsifiable. That automatically makes it supernatural fiction outside the realms if science. If you can't prove it wrong, and you can't prove it right either, it's because it doesn't exist. Just like you can't disprove the existence of a magical invisible teapot living in the sky, that controls the universe. Lack of evidence is precisely how to disprove something's existence. It's the only way in fact. Blind faith is the most dishonest position anyone can ever possibly have. It is the opposite of science and logical thinking. Incredible how convoluted your line of thinking and your belief system is. So your favourite magical being that allegedly loves us humans so much, makes it impossible for us to find evidence of his existence, only to then punish the smart humans that actually have good reasons to question and doubt his existence with a punishment so severe, that literally no human on earth could possibly ever deserve it. Not like heaven's much better either of course, as it's a literal eternity of mindless slave worship of some narcissistic, evil being with no way out. I'd rather just die. And of course I have to repeat myself. Planes don't require blind faith. I know for a fact that planes are statistically the safest form of transport in existence. We also know for a fact that life is possible, and that planets are possible. We've known that life is possible forever. This isn't a recent discovery. However, the situation for your belief is far worse than just a lack of evidence for a god existing. There is literally no indication of a POSSIBILITY of such a thing existing. Not even a possibility. Never mind a magical being like that actually existing. If the bible is anything to go on, gods understanding is that of a primitive bronze age goat herder. So we are more advanced than this bible god of yours. And even if there was a god, everything in the bible is still demonstrably false and hilariously ignorant and stupid. The bible will still be a book of stolen fables from earlier legends and myths, with some obvious poetry and things not meant to be taken literal (like the entire book of genesis) also stolen from older works like the Epic of Gilgamesh.
    2
  11.  @georgesyoutube  Sigh all you want buddy, ain't gonna change nuthin
    1
  12.  @madwhitehare3635  erm....do research
    1
  13.  @satapon4129  What personal accounts? Where?
    1
  14.  @satapon4129  All sources after the fact then. Conflicting sources of potentially different men and older legends combined. Even if there was some man called Jesus, the actual character of Jesus people think of today is probably so removed from the truth, it's like a Robin Hood tale. The actual man it's based on wouldn't even recognise himself in the modern bible.
    1
  15.  @satapon4129  The character may be based on some guy called Jesus, which was a common name for that area anyways. But it's still just a fictional character. Like Helen of Troy. I mean apart from the bible and its copycat religions, where else can we see 1st hand accounts of this man? That's what I'm struggling with. Just how much of the character is actually based on a single real person? Are some aspects borrowed from older legends? Or are they all based on the same guy? What actually happened?
    1
  16.  @satapon4129  Luke and John just copied and stole the works of Mark. They also all contradict eachother. Also they're contained in the bible, which defeats the purpose of unbiased evidence. There really is almost next to no evidence for Jesus existing.
    1