Comments by "Julia P." (@juliap.5375) on "Glenn Diesen" channel.

Read this proverb in books of 19 century: “when two old neighbors are fighting, then last night one was visited by Englishman” :D
41
Of course not defeated. Looks like everyone forgot initial plans. Crimea was initial point, from which they wanted go to deep into Ural and cut whole Siberia (when everyone discuss about Crimea, everyone forgot that to Far East also was sent ships and they were totally defeated). Same with Caucasus where GB launched uprise of muslims. Also failed.
12
@garylancaster8612 But it is true. Several centuries of history how Britain in non stop mode attack Russia, indirectly or directly (did you knew, that first concentration camps of death in Russia built not Germans, but England during invasion of 1918? — one of hundreds examples). Just this days Britain on conference discussed that it need to supply UA with a-weapon. Think again about what England talks. And what it means.
6
@franksullivan1873 First of all, Stalin was Georgian and even speak in Russian with terribly accent. After Stalin to power came his friend — Ukrainian. And then else one. First Russian leaders in USSR came to power only in 1980s. And what exactly Stalin did? Gave to them 80% of their modern territories? :D Introduced Ukrainian language, which never were used on that lands?)
4
From Russian point of view, participation of any country in NATO means nothing. Because if Russia will decide to punish, as example, Germany, it can do it and status of NATO is irrelevant here. What will happens then? NATO will declared war? It can’t happen. Because there are no option when they survive. Russia explained this a lot of times. Moreover, it explained, that being in NATO is more dangerous, because in such case such country becomes target.
4
@sandybartkus6225 No. US couldn’t. Look, this is strategic missile carriers, they are not against US, but against targets in EU. Amount of them is limited by treaty between Russia and US. Now we got misbalance. It means Russia will replace this ancient planes from 1960s with modern hypersonic ICBMs. Which will be already against US. It is strike by US actually. Secondly, unlikely in this participated someone from West. This planes were fully loaded with thermonuclear missiles and with pre-programmed targets in Europe. We are lucky none of them were launched by short circuit.. For me is hard to believe, some one in West decide to be so risky to get automatic launch of such weapons (that missiles have range of 6500, they full cover whole Europe, there are no needs to fly somewhere to launch them).
3
@JonesBeiges Sorry, looks like you are teen, so I will explain to you: yesterday were destroyed strategic missies carriers. They are were on duty, it means fully loaded with missiles with range of 6500 km and thermonuclear warheads. Each one is pre-programmed with targets somewhere in EU. Do you understand, that we are lucky, that none of them by chance was not launched? Just short circuit in the wiring and they could be launched. Also, you missed else one fact. Superpowers in world is only Russia and US. Europe here not represent any power. They have irrelevant amount of warheads, very old and outdated carriers. Theoretically they can bit, but nothing more. While Russia can do anything.
3
@pontusmalmstrom1055 Russia invite on own TV everyone. As example on the most popular politic TV show was invited journalist from Britain. Already for 2 weeks almost each day publicly. But he not came, afraid, because he is nothing more than just propagandist :) There are dozens of similar examples.
3
You are so advanced. You need to organize month of pride to celebrate this…
3
Else one news — Russia finished closed nuclear cycle and now can use U-238 (99,27% of all uranium on Earth) as fuel. Not only U-235 (0,7%) like all rest. It means Russia have now enough energy for whole planet for at least 3 thousands years. Experimental reactors already work perfectly, now country building first commercial.
2
Oil used not only as fuel, it is used in chemistry to produce everything, from oils and paints to plastics. Best oil for this heavy, while light is better only for fuel. Guess who have most heavy oil in whole world? Only 3 countries: Russia, Iran and Venezuela. Also a bit somewhere on north have Canada :) Ta-dam!
2
⁠ @Hotstepper2569 Else again — this is not regular aviation, but strategic missile carriers. They always on duty, 24/7 exactly like ICBMs. When they are not, according to treaty, they are moved to test site facility. There are no any other options. You can’t activate nuclear (especially thermonuclear) warhead with any kind of interference, it is safe device 😂 But it is possibly to activate missile.
2
It is more expensive actually. In general with it a lot of troubles.
1
@Hotstepper2569 It is strategic missile carriers — they always on duty and loaded, 24/7. That’s why they are members of START treaty and considered as deployed strategic unit equal to ICBM with appropriate restrictions. When they are not on duty, they have no right to be placed on own airbase and must be removed to test site of factory. In such case they not considered as deployed unit.
1
@Hotstepper2569 Else again — they have small amount of old warheads on outdated and easily intercepted carriers. While only defence ring of Moscow (with hypersonic A-235) need more warheads to penetrate it than both counties have combined. So, even in worst scenario they almost can’t harm. While Russia have possibility to eliminate them fully. Also, countries in different military age. Russia already have deployed hypersonic missiles on surface, air and sea. Not France, not UK have possibilities to see this launches, have no protection at all and have no time for reaction. They can disappear before can do anything. In worst scenario 1-2 their submarines will launch something, it is easily intercepted targets.
1
@gregorygant4242 Are you serious? Russia can erase whole this country and nothing will happens. Literally nothing. There are no fools around who will decide to join to this party and immediately repeat similar destiny. Also, right now is not 1970s when two superpowers had similar weights. We are in 2025, when for last 40 years US built zero of new systems (both in offense and defence), while Russia built several new generations and kinds. In case of global conflict, Russia will stay, while rest — even have no chance.
1
@gregorygant4242 Are you serious? Russia can eliminate them and nothing will happens. Literally nothing. There are no strange countries around who will decide to join to this "party". Also, right now is not 1970s when two superpowers had similar weights. We are in 2025, when for last 40 years US built zero of new systems (both in offense and defence), while Russia built several new generations and kinds. In case of global conflict, Russia will stay, while rest — even have no theoretical chance.
1
Russia have nuclear reactors for space, latest can provide 1 MWh for 7 years on one load. It pretty compact. Main trouble with reactors in space — how and where spread heat. A lot of heat.
1