Comments by "Julia P." (@juliap.5375) on "Hindustan Times"
channel.
-
69
-
43
-
31
-
20
-
16
-
@close_all_tabs You are looking in wrong way. Different countries have different prices on exactly same goods, that’s why impossibly to compare countries just by amount of GDP, it is pointless. So, two years ago Germany had 5th economy in world, while Russia 6th. In 2023 according to World bank statistic, Russia became 5th economy in world and 1st in Europe, while Germany became 6th. And looks like by results of this year Germany will be already just 7th.
Also exist else one statistic — industrial production only. Russia there is 4th in world (top-5: China, India, US, Russia, Japanese).
Also exist statistic by amount of different production (it is when you produce everything, from space ships to nuclear icebreakers). Russia there on 2nd place, after China and even above US (they for last decades lost own industry, as example they already even can’t produce Boeing and F-35 alone, without 3rd countries, while Russia produce). Germany even not in top-10, it have no dozens industries, from own processors to space ships.
15
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
11
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
7
-
@doddsalfa Far right, fascism? Putin returned 75% of Russian economic in state property, it is exactly same economical system which existed during Stalin’s era: 2/3 is communism, 1/3 is capitalism.
Ideology — same internationalism. In 2006 Putin founded BRICS — union of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa. Goal — independent from colonial empires financial and economical system.
Just week ago to Russia came leaders of 45 African countries (!), discussion — how to resist to modern western neo-colonialism. Moreover, Russia right now in UA fight against classical fascists and nazis (they SS declared as own heroes, deny languages, last year burned 11 million books as said itself), even all same countries as 80 years before — full former Hitler’s coalition + several colonial empires.
USA in everything is opposing to Russia. Country even born as opposition to Europe, so Russia and US are like two polar points, only Europe somewhere between and have elements from both.
One had slavery, another — never.
One had race segregation — another arrived as multi-race union.
One born capitalism, another — communism.
One represent Protestants (reject initial Christianity), another — Orthodoxes (initial Christianity).
One in Cold War fought for preserving colonialism, another — liberated colonies.
…
Even exist funny psychological tests. As example situation: you return back to home, home in fire, inside your parent and spouse, you can save only one, your action? In USA 99% choose — spouse. In Russia 99% choose parent. So different values and mentality of both nations :)
7
-
@fabianschrotter Whole world turned away from West after modern events. Even Saudi Arabia declared year ago about rejection from dollars (regards to Saudia back in 1970s dollar became main world’s currency), europeans expelled from African countries (with help of Russia), West forever lost Russia… how many trillions of dollars is that? 😂 Whole Europe represent desert which lived regards to cheap Russian energy and cheap infinity resources. Now they lost this privilege and already fall, while Russia became 1st economy in Europe (official statistic of World Bank in 2023). They also lost dozens countries in Africa. In nearest future they will lost access to almost all resources. Do you understand what it’s mean? They already turning in 3rd world countries, with incredible high criminal rate, ruined infrastructure, economy, ghettos. Will be in dozens times worst. World now can forget about West… okey, US will survive for some time regards to resources from Australia, but not for a long time. Because US survived regards to dollar (thanks to BRICS now this gone) and access to richest and largest market — European, which now turning into poorest 😂
While Russia — it only got boost for own economy and became richer, mentioned by you trillions is means direct investments in own economy! 🎉
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
@doddsalfa Else again, Putin returned to Russia communistic system, 75% of Russian economic (companies, factories) in state property. Preserved free medicine, free education, some categories of people even get free apartments from state in own property. Not so cool like in USSR, but close.
Everywhere in world poverty is more than in USSR because in USSR it non existed :D State provided to anyone own apartments, for free, medicine only for free, education only for free, everyone had guaranteed work, in country was no homeless and zero unemployment rate. Everyone had near similar level of live (1985): salary less than ₽80 (₽70 is minimal) had 4.8%, over ₽400 — 3,1%.
Back in 1990s when into Russia came capitalism, it is true, arrived poverty and even misery with millions of homeless. Statistic from 2000: 42% in poverty, 20% in misery..
But after Putin restored economical system, this is gone. Nowadays in Russia misery is 0%, poverty — 9,8% (2023).
Far less than in USA where are not just poverty, there are even homeless everywhere (!), total misery, people dreaming about own apartments/house (in Russia 87% have in own property apartments and almost each family also have summer house), forced to pay student loans (in Russia people even never heard about this), etc.
About oligarchy — Putin removed, sent to prison or expelled all oligarchs. Back from 2008 in Russia there are no oligarchs at all. While in US there are oligarchy everywhere, from Elon Musk to Trump.
5
-
4
-
3
-
@kaspertube512 Silly lie.
1) Russia never declared about any terms of operation, not about 3 days, not about 1 year. There are no terms. As example operation in Syria still is continued, almost 10 years already. So what?
2) Victory? Victory is possibly in war, this is not a war. That’s why Russia even gave personal guarantees of safety to Zelensky and not attacked vital infrastructure (like electricity) in UA (until UA not started made terror attacks). Russia declared conditions (status of neutral country, freedom to regions which not accepted coup back in 2014, denazification like in Germany after WW2), when UA will accept them, everything will end, if not — will continue.
3) Initially everything was end in April ‘22 when UA in Istanbul signed agreement where agreed with such conditions and as result Russia declared about return of own forces. It’s England with US forced UA to fight, use them as cheap cannon meat. Okey, it can continue until they have alive forces. Over 1 million already gone. Russia is not moving, it calmly sit behind of own defense lines and have no loses. Instead it build new roads and railroads on own new territories.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@mzk7774 Of course everyone afraid. Said that and lose everything what you have :-/ As closer country to orbit of U.S.A, there more people afraid to talk what they really think.
But about this law — imagine someone will go to South Korea/Germany/etc, make this surgery there, and then return back. What to do? Russian govt (not Putin, he is just president) accepted this law on emotions, as they said “in last 10 years in U.S. amount of such surgeries increased in 50 times, up to 1 million 640 thousands in 2022, from which 340 thousands is among teens (13-17yo)”. Just imagine, all that 340k teens give no birth. Okey, US population growing regards to random migrants, but what about rest? But this is emotions. What to with people who change sex abroad? And when in Russia people ask similar questions, nobody have answer.
What next? Let’s imagine in ID (passport) you are man, but in really already female. And you made some crime. What to do with you? Especially it is actual for Russia, in Russia women and men get different punishment (e.g. men can get life sentence, women — not; for men exist prisons, for women — no, only camps and colonies). Maybe something similar exist in Netherlands too, idk. So lot questions actually. So, from one side law is good, from another side — unclear.
My opinion — to avoid this need to ban Hollywood movies (they add propaganda of this literally in each movie, impossibly already to watch anything).
3
-
@Ast151 Lol. Looks like you are drunk.
1. In Russia funding from state which movie makers can get is limited by just $1 million, moreover, this budget is limited for only few movies per year, rest get much less (in average $500 thousands) and then must return money back to state. Who will get this payment is discussed on public presentations after public vote.
In 90% cases it is just tiny loan with zero percent.
Americans also of course use federal budget, do you really think when in movie as example a lot of weapons, for it paid producers? Right to Pentagon? Facepalm. It is free for movie makers (for that paid taxpayers). Also in US is popular direct order of movies by state organizations. As example almost all police drama series, they all ordered/funded by officials. Just more complicated and less public scheme: state gave grant to university which prepares students for forensic science, then this university order TV show series about criminalists and paid for it with money from grant. Looks like you never saw “film about movie/series”, directors often itself tell that it was state order.
2. The most stupid thing in world is attempt to compare foreign salary with ordinary conversion. As example (2017) in Russia for $10 possibly to buy 5 BigMacs, at same time in US for $20 only 4 BigMacs. It means $10 in Russia in over than 2 times more than $20 in USA. That why nobody in world with a bit of brain compares salaries directly, goods have different prices.
Also you lied, average Russian salary nowadays is $760 (after all taxes). It means something like $2000 in USA. And it is average salary for largest in world country, if talk about industrial regions, not rural areas where living nomads, e.g. Moscow, then it is already $1400, which means like over $3000 in USA.
I can remind to you, that Russia is 2nd in world by popularity country for migrant workers, because even courier or taxi driver earn enough to live in Russia and send money to own family abroad.
Also need to remember, that in Russia education is free (in USA people need loans for that), medicine is free (of course for some rare and super expensive things nobody will pay, but in average, e.g. ordinary cancer, broken leg and so on people paid zero, while in US it is real tragedy, people afraid to ill), when you born kid, state to you give a lot of money (~10 month salary), heat and electricity in Russia cost almost nothing, apartments also cheap, almost each family have own apartments in city and summer house somewhere in rural area in own property already at age of 35-40 years, a lot of more examples. That why in Russia almost no homeless and majority have education, while in USA millions and millions of homeless and one of the largest amount of people in world which can’t read and write (is it 3rd world or not?).
3. Over 75% of Russian population living in cities, it means have centralized water system and even centralized heat system. So you just lie. While lack of water can be only in rural area, especially between nomadic tribes. Which, believe, not cares about running water at all.
While examples of “3rd world”, it is when during winter in England died up to 40 thousands people because of cold, in cities (at same time Russians in own apartmens wear only underwear and love to open windows at -30 for fresh air). Or “3rd world” is what we saw during modern epidemic in USA, because country have no enough hospitals, lack of doctors, have no equipment, have no isolation boxes. For comparison in any large Russian city there are more isolation boxes than in whole US state. I’m even silent about homeless, ghettoes and no-go zones.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@warren6891 1) Russia already over year not send additional troops to battlefield, so no, it not lost "thousands more". It means it almost have no losses actually. In Avdeevka Russia used just 7 brigades, while UA - 17 brigades. UA last two months publicly discussed about needs of additional 500k (total losses already close to 1 million).
2) Are you just compared Iraq and UA? Iraq — small country with weak army which rejected to fight immediately. UA — hugest in Europe army, more than have all EU countries combined. With more weapons than have all European countries combined. Army with one of the lowest loss threshold (not retreat until left few out of hundreds). Iraq — had no help. UA — have help from 50 countries, including whole NATO. Both with weapons and even dozens thousands of soldiers (so-called volunteers, actually illegally troops).
In Iraq US used strategy of cover bombings, in result there are near 2 million losses of civilians. Russia do not use such strategy, so loses on civilians is less than as example for 2 month in Gaza (with population in 10 times less). One of the lowest in history actually.
3) Russia not lost anything. When UA signed treaty, Russia declared about own withdraw of forces back to home, operation was finished in 1 month. But then joined Wes and forced UA to fight. If they were clever enough and wait at least a week before cancel deal, then whole troops would return back. Initially UA had chance to return to Minsk agreement and preserve all own territories, it was publicly declared condition. While nowadays Russia declared another goals for own operation, like "demilitarization". It means it will fight until in UA army exist at least one soldier. While territories — nobody cares about territories, main goal — to reduce amount of soldiers in UA to zero. By estimations already 1 million done.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@halberderdier8073 Facepalm.
1. It was not separatists, but forces from Afghan who invaded Chechnya soon after dissolve of USSR. Open list of commanders — almost all were arabs from Qatar, Oman, Saudia, etc. how they arrived there? Together with USSR gone everything, like KGB (border guards). Borders of country were opened and non controlled. CIA funded them in Afghan and then started to transfer inside of Russia already. They started from massacre on city’s square against ethnical groups and non-muslims.
2. After short war in was signed peace — they agreed to liberated all people (hundreds thousands of refugees) and promised peaceful live, while Russia agreed on independence. Russia never cared about lands. If you forgot, Yeltsin openly visited each republic in Russia and called to independence. Moscow was only happy to expel them.
3. In 1999 they attacked Russia — Dagestan republic, decide to build Islamic Caliphate (whole this region, except several lands — fully consist from muslims). It’s when Russians became angry. So very soon everyone was wiped out. Including those who ran away abroad. Locals after years under Sharia laws (music — prohibited, women have no rights, etc) of course voted to rejoin with Russia.
And you forgot main example — UA itself. UA became independent because in Moscow happened coup. It is exactly what is written in declaration of independence. So, you can’t support at same time right of UA for independence and reject in exactly same right to territories of former UA. You have double standards. Actually it was illegally before, but West back in 1999 created Kosovo. Without any referendum, just occupied that lands and declared new independent state. Moreover, forced whole world to accept this in UN, so nowadays any territory have right to declared own independence without opinion of rest country.
Also you forgot rest aspects:
— in Jan 2022 UA in Munich said they planning to create a-bomb.
— they declared SS as own state heroes. After Nurnberg it means they are outlaw.
— they are nobody, they seized power in country, so they are illegal.
— they violated Minsk agreement.
— they attacked two independence countries (after Kosovo, it is irrelevant how Kiew regime perceive this territories — they had referendum and proclaimed self, so they are not anymore part of UA). This countries signed alliance with Russia, so according to UN rule 51, Russia came to protect allies against invader (illegal outlaw forces which occupied UA)…
1
-
Nazi? With easy! It is people who:
— applaud in parliament to alive member of SS,
— elect (else in 1998) in own parliament one of top WW2 times nazi,
— declared in own country SS/SD/rest similar as national heroes, open to them monuments, give names to streets,
— who demolished thousands monuments to anti-fascists,
— denied communists,
— burned people and show this right on TV online (viewers applaud),
— accept in army greeting — official copy from greeting in Reich,
— denied for people usage of own native language and beat if they use it on streets,
— vote in UN against condemn of nazism…
Sounds like… several western countries. Whole this list — one country, it just lost Himars on this video.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Exactly.. looks like. They only nowadays made on own ships systems which had Soviets already 40 years ago. While Russia already works over next cycle of space exploration — testing prototype of first in world nuclear tug (powerful reactor supply engines, one nuclear load enough for 7 years of work in space, can rich great speed, in few times faster than rockets can, can maneuvers, return back to Earth, carry huge weights). At same time SpaceX talks some nonsense about conquest of Mars on... rockets! It like in mid-20 century discuss about travel on house carriage. Yep, still majority of world had and used mainly them, but developed countries preferred cars and airplanes.
As first work it will be used to build Russian-Chinese base on Moon (and base will be incredible cheap, cost of work of such tug for several years just few millions of dollars). As joke Russia gave funny name to this program — Zeus. If you remember, Zeus was father of Apollo and Artemis :D Russian humor.
1
-
1
-
1
-
About movies — it is impossibly to compare. Too different schools and products. It is like to compare Dostoevsky and comics about Spider Man. Yep, latest one is more popular, but Dostoevsky is Dostoevsky. Same with movies, I just don’t know examples of intellectual movies from USA (except some from 1930-50s), maybe they exist, but I never heard and never saw even on international presentations, only European and of course Russian, from time to time from other countries. So, to be clear, it is not truth, US not no.1 in every movie industry, in US just lack of whole directions. US mainly produce so-called ‘entertaining movies’, while in Europe it is just subgenre (in which a lot of european directors just never work). It is not good or bad, just different cultures. Some people prefer Spider Man, while other “War and peace”.
About rest industries — 100% not, few examples:
Nuclear industry — US behind for several decades in everything (after WW2 for some short time were ahead), some directions inside of industry just have no at all (already for 40-50 years, especially in space and closed cycle).
Rocket science — behind.
Modern communications (e.g. quantum lines) — behind.
Radars — far behind (for near 20 years after WW2 were ahead).
Lasers — behind (while at past times both nations won Nobel prize for invention of them).
1
-
1
-
@alexchlomandar3805 1. Movie maker company is “Yellow, Black and White”, they are the most successful company in Russia which earn billions. Even Disney order movies in this company (yep, when you see in title disney, it not means that movie made disney, they mainly just put own name and literally nothing else).
2. Actually it is not about movie or how to beat Tom Cruise, it is old Russian program how to reduce time which need to prepare non professional cosmonauts. 25 years ago it took 1 year 2 month, then 9 month, now 3,5 month. Specially for this experiment created new version of Soyuz space ship which can control only 1 professional cosmonaut (preparation of professional cosmonaut took 10 years), not two like it was before.
As continue of experiment this December Russia will send two tourists from Japan.
It is part of Lunar program, how to prepare people of different professions for short time to send on Moon. So, if not this movies makers, it could be just any other literally random people. At least movie makers will film movie and gather a lot of money.
3. I’m not sure they even paid for flight (because it is part of experiment), but anyway it is cheap and a lot of Russian companies can allow this for self. Russian space industry is not private, it in state property, that why incredible cheap. Rocket cost a bit more than cost of metal scrap, for rocket state paid to self, not to someone else. I bet cams cost more than whole this flight (director took with self 4 main cameras which cost $500 thousands and whole bunch of less expensive).
Yep, Americans paid incredible money for seats in Soyuz, but Russia always increased price for Americans after anti-Russia behavior, aggressive speeches of american officials, literally as punishment. For tourists at same time price was in several times less than for astronauts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@f-35lightningii6 According to Ukraine, Russia also lost 1500 tanks T-14 back in 2015 :D Yep, non existing T-14 and yep, back in 2015. Also Russia lost more troops than it sent and had. Miracle, isn’t it? ;)
Russia even in theory couldn’t lost so lot jets at least because it not use aviation. Jets was used during first two week actively, when destroyed whole UA fleet (largest in Europe) and then in rare cases by few jets once per several month, there are no targets there, because UA have no fleet.
Russia use cruise missiles with ranges from 1500 to 5500 km. Of course, according to best NATO experts, Russia had missiles only for 2 month of battle, while it already used more than whole West produced for last 20 years and still continue to use almost each day :)
Unlike US(West), Russia from Soviet times have different war conceptions. As example US have strategic bombers, Russia have no, it have missiles carries. Different approach. As you see, weapons looks similar, but represent different type. Different type define different kind of war. This explains why you spread fake, because such loses possibly only for NATO conception of battle, not Russian.
P.S.
Su-57 was used in Syria. Funny, but information about this leaked from US media, they demonstrated photos of fighters. Russian MoD almost never discovere such information.
Su-57 was used in first week in UA, there was videos of them.
Where you forgot Su-35? I remind, F-22 arrived to fight against Su-27. Before they finished project, arrived Su-30. And then (2012) — Su-35.
Why China must to use J-20 (canceled Soviet project MiG 1.44) in Taiwan? Facepalm.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Babumoshai.. He was just first man. Before of people sent animals, not all returned alive. And to be more correctly, before of man and animals sent nuclear bombs. Because it was not just rocket, it was 100% ICBM. If you forgot, it was soon after West declared new war against USSR after WW2 (nowadays known as Cold War, mainly regards to this flight of rocket, West afraid to attack USSR, so that war never became hot) when UK and US prepared to nuclear strike and total extermination of USSR (or more correctly everything from Poland to North China). Soviets had no possibilities to send bomb on aviation (too far, too lot risks, while UK and US had own bombers on Soviet borders), that why decide to build rockets instead of bombers. Man in space was secondary goal, so it is funny fact: man flew into space on ICBM.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1